Hanna M, Dissanaike S
Department of Surgery, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, 3601 4th Street, Room 3A159, Lubbock, TX, 79424, USA,
Hernia. 2015 Apr;19(2):339-44. doi: 10.1007/s10029-014-1330-9. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
Removal is the standard treatment for mesh infection following prosthetic hernia repair. However, certain types of mesh may be less amenable to removal even in the setting of active infection; we present four such cases, all involving the same composite mesh.
Four high-risk patients underwent Parietex mesh implantation for large ventral wall hernias and developed subsequent Staphylococcus infections with attempted explantation of infected mesh and wound care.
There was inability to completely explant mesh in all four cases, leading to chronic purulent wounds and long-term complications.
While mesh infection is a recognized complication of prosthetic hernia repair, many synthetic meshes form a slimy biofilm and thus can be removed relatively easily. However, the structural qualities of certain types of mesh create ingrowth into tissues even in the setting of infection, resulting in inability to explant with subsequent long-term chronic wound complications.
移除是人工疝修补术后补片感染的标准治疗方法。然而,某些类型的补片即使在存在活动性感染的情况下也可能较难移除;我们展示了4例这样的病例,均涉及同一种复合补片。
4例高危患者因大型腹壁疝接受了 Parietex 补片植入,随后发生葡萄球菌感染,并尝试移除感染的补片及进行伤口护理。
4例均无法完全移除补片,导致慢性化脓性伤口和长期并发症。
虽然补片感染是人工疝修补术公认的并发症,但许多合成补片会形成粘性生物膜,因此相对容易移除。然而,某些类型补片的结构特性即使在感染情况下也会向内生长入组织,导致无法移除补片,并引发随后的长期慢性伤口并发症。