• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

择期疝修补术中肠切开术或意外肠切除术后的并发症风险。

Risk of complications from enterotomy or unplanned bowel resection during elective hernia repair.

作者信息

Gray Stephen H, Vick Catherine C, Graham Laura A, Finan Kelly R, Neumayer Leigh A, Hawn Mary T

机构信息

University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1530 3rd Ave S, KB 429, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.

出版信息

Arch Surg. 2008 Jun;143(6):582-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.6.582.

DOI:10.1001/archsurg.143.6.582
PMID:18559752
Abstract

HYPOTHESIS

Enterotomy or unplanned bowel resection (EBR) may occur during elective incisional hernia repair (IHR) and significantly affects surgical outcomes and hospital resource use.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of patients undergoing IHR between January 1998 and December 2002.

SETTING

Sixteen tertiary care Veterans Affairs medical centers.

PATIENTS

A total of 1124 elective incisional hernia repairs identified in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set.

INTERVENTION

Elective IHR.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Thirty-day postoperative complication rate, return to operating room, length of stay, and operative time.

RESULTS

Of the 1124 elective procedures, 74.1% were primary IHR, 13.3% were recurrent prior mesh IHR, and 12.6% were recurrent prior suture. Overall, 7.3% had an EBR. The incidence of EBR was increased in patients with prior repair: 5.3% for primary repair, 5.7% for recurrent prior suture, and 20.3% for prior mesh repair (P < .001). The occurrence of EBR was associated with increased postoperative complications (31.7% vs 9.5%; P < .001), rate of reoperation within 30 days (14.6% vs 3.6%; P < .001), and development of enterocutaneous fistula (7.3% vs 0.7%; P < .001). After adjusting for procedure type, age, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class, EBR was associated with an increase in median operative time (1.7 to 3.5 hours; P < .001) and mean length of stay (4.0 to 6.0 days; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Enterotomy or unplanned bowel resection is more likely to complicate recurrent IHR with prior mesh. The occurrence of EBR is associated with increased postoperative complications, return to the operating room, risk of enterocutaneous fistula, length of hospitalization, and operative time.

摘要

假设

在择期切口疝修补术(IHR)期间可能会发生肠切开术或意外肠切除术(EBR),这会显著影响手术结果和医院资源的使用。

设计

对1998年1月至2002年12月期间接受IHR的患者进行回顾性研究。

设置

16家三级医疗退伍军人事务医疗中心。

患者

在国家外科质量改进计划数据集中确定的总共1124例择期切口疝修补术。

干预措施

择期IHR。

主要观察指标

术后30天并发症发生率、返回手术室情况、住院时间和手术时间。

结果

在1124例择期手术中,74.1%为初次IHR,13.3%为既往有补片的复发性IHR,12.6%为既往有缝线的复发性IHR。总体而言,7.3%发生了EBR。既往有修补史的患者EBR发生率增加:初次修补为5.3%,既往有缝线的复发性修补为5.7%,既往有补片的修补为20.3%(P<.001)。EBR的发生与术后并发症增加(31.7%对9.5%;P<.001)、30天内再次手术率(14.6%对3.6%;P<.001)以及肠皮肤瘘的发生(7.3%对0.7%;P<.001)相关。在对手术类型、年龄和美国麻醉医师协会分级进行调整后,EBR与中位手术时间增加(1.7至3.5小时;P<.001)和平均住院时间增加(4.0至6.0天;P<.001)相关。

结论

肠切开术或意外肠切除术更有可能使既往有补片的复发性IHR复杂化。EBR的发生与术后并发症增加、返回手术室、肠皮肤瘘风险、住院时间和手术时间相关。

相似文献

1
Risk of complications from enterotomy or unplanned bowel resection during elective hernia repair.择期疝修补术中肠切开术或意外肠切除术后的并发症风险。
Arch Surg. 2008 Jun;143(6):582-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.143.6.582.
2
Outcomes of emergent incisional hernia repair.急诊切口疝修补术的结果
Am Surg. 2011 Aug;77(8):971-6.
3
Risks of subsequent abdominal operations after laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.腹腔镜腹疝修补术后再次腹部手术的风险。
Surg Endosc. 2017 Feb;31(2):823-828. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5038-z. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
4
Outcomes for incisional hernia repair in patients undergoing concomitant surgical procedures.接受同期外科手术的患者切口疝修补的结果。
Am Surg. 2012 Feb;78(2):243-9.
5
Long-term Recurrence and Complications Associated With Elective Incisional Hernia Repair.择期切口疝修补术后的长期复发和并发症。
JAMA. 2016 Oct 18;316(15):1575-1582. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.15217.
6
Interposition of the omentum and/or the peritoneum in the emergency repair of large ventral hernias with polypropylene mesh.网膜和/或腹膜在聚丙烯网片急诊修补大型腹壁疝中的应用。
Int J Surg. 2014;12(6):578-86. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
7
Reoperation Through a Prosthetic-Reinforced Abdominal Wall and Its Association With Postoperative Outcomes and Longitudinal Health Care Utilization.经假体强化腹壁再次手术及其与术后结局和纵向医疗保健利用的关系。
JAMA Surg. 2022 Oct 1;157(10):908-916. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.3320.
8
Long-term follow-up of technical outcomes for incisional hernia repair.切口疝修补术技术结局的长期随访。
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 May;210(5):648-55, 655-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.12.038.
9
Repair of giant incisional abdominal wall hernias using open intraperitoneal mesh.使用开放腹腔内补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝
Hernia. 2007 Aug;11(4):315-20. doi: 10.1007/s10029-007-0222-7. Epub 2007 Apr 12.
10
Technique and outcomes of abdominal incisional hernia repair using a synthetic composite mesh: a report of 455 cases.使用合成复合补片修复腹壁切口疝的技术与结果:455例报告
J Am Coll Surg. 2008 Jan;206(1):83-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.07.030. Epub 2007 Oct 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Adhesions After Laparoscopic IPOM-How Serious Is the Problem?腹腔镜下腹腔内补片植入术后粘连——问题有多严重?
J Abdom Wall Surg. 2025 Mar 26;4:14126. doi: 10.3389/jaws.2025.14126. eCollection 2025.
2
Long-term mesh-related complications from minimally invasive intraperitoneal onlay mesh for small to medium-sized ventral hernias.微创经腹腔内置补片修补术治疗小至中型腹外疝的长期网片相关并发症。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Apr;38(4):2019-2026. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-10716-y. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
3
Epidemiology and surgical management of 184 obturator hernias: a nationwide registry-based cohort study.
184 例闭孔疝的流行病学和外科治疗:基于全国登记的队列研究。
Hernia. 2023 Dec;27(6):1451-1459. doi: 10.1007/s10029-023-02891-z. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
4
The incidence and impact of enterotomy during laparoscopic and robotic ventral hernia repair: a nationwide readmissions analysis.腹腔镜和机器人腹疝修补术中肠切开的发生率和影响:全国再入院分析。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Aug;37(8):6385-6394. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-09867-1. Epub 2023 Jun 5.
5
Robotic eTEP versus IPOM evaluation: the REVEAL multicenter randomized clinical trial.机器人经肛内镜前列腺切除术与经肛微创前列腺切除术评估:REVEAL 多中心随机临床试验。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):2143-2153. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09722-9. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
6
PROPHYlactic Implantation of BIOlogic Mesh in peritonitis (PROPHYBIOM): a prospective multicentric randomized controlled trial.预防性植入生物补片在腹膜炎中的应用(PROPHYBIOM):一项前瞻性多中心随机对照试验。
Trials. 2022 Mar 4;23(1):198. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06103-4.
7
Improved Understanding of Acute Incisional Hernia Incarceration: Implications for Addressing the Excess Mortality of Emergent Repair.提高对急性切口疝嵌顿的认识:解决紧急修复过度死亡率的意义。
J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Nov;231(5):536-545.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2020.08.735. Epub 2020 Aug 19.
8
Totally extraperitoneal approach for open complex abdominal wall reconstruction.完全腹膜外途径在开放性复杂腹壁重建中的应用。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jan;35(1):159-164. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07374-1. Epub 2020 Feb 6.
9
Robotic transabdominal preperitoneal approach for repair of primary, uncomplicated ventral hernias.机器人经腹腹膜前入路修复原发性、非复杂性腹正中疝。
Hernia. 2019 Oct;23(5):1019-1020. doi: 10.1007/s10029-019-02057-w. Epub 2019 Oct 26.
10
What's New in the Management of Incarcerated Hernia.《监禁性疝管理的新进展》
J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Jan;24(1):221-230. doi: 10.1007/s11605-019-04352-4. Epub 2019 Oct 21.