Zhong Shuang, Clark Michele, Hou Xiang-Yu, Zang Yuli, FitzGerald Gerard
Associate Professor, Center for Health Management and Policy, Shandong University, China Research Fellow, Center for Emergency and Disaster Management, School of Public Health and Social Work, Queensland University of Technology, Australia
Professor, School of Clinical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology, Australia.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2015 Apr;20(2):74-82. doi: 10.1177/1355819614561537. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
Hospital resilience is an emerging concept, which can be defined as 'a hospital's ability to resist, absorb, and respond to the shock of disasters while maintaining its critical health care functions, and then recover to its original state or adapt to a new one'. Our aim was to develop a comprehensive framework of key indicators of hospital resilience.
A panel of 33 Chinese experts was invited to participate in a three-round, modified Delphi study to develop a set of potential measures previously derived from a literature review. In the first round, these potential measures were modified to cover the comprehensive domains of hospital resilience. The importance of proposed measures was scored by experts on a five-point Likert scale. Subsequently, the experts reconsidered their voting in light of the previous aggregated results. Agreement on measures was defined as at least 70% of the responders agreeing or strongly agreeing to the inclusion of a measure.
A large proportion of preliminary measures (89.5%) were identified as having good potential for assessing hospital resilience. These measures were categorized into eight domains, 17 subdomains, and 43 indicators. The highest rated indicators (mean score) were: equipment for on-site rescue (4.7), plan initiation (4.6), equipment for referral of patients with complex care needs (4.5), the plan execution (4.4), medication management strategies (4.4), emergency medical treatment conditions (4.4), disaster committee (4.4), stock types and quantities for essential medications (4.4), surge capacity of emergency beds (4.4), and mass-casualty triage protocols (4.4).
This framework identifies a comprehensive set of indicators of hospital resilience. It can be used for hospital assessment, as well as informing priority practices to address future disasters better.
医院恢复力是一个新兴概念,可定义为“医院在维持其关键医疗保健功能的同时,抵抗、承受并应对灾害冲击,然后恢复到原始状态或适应新状态的能力”。我们的目的是制定一个医院恢复力关键指标的综合框架。
邀请33位中国专家组成的小组参与三轮改进的德尔菲研究,以制定一组先前从文献综述中得出的潜在措施。在第一轮中,对这些潜在措施进行修改,以涵盖医院恢复力的综合领域。专家们根据五点李克特量表对提议措施的重要性进行评分。随后,专家们根据之前的汇总结果重新考虑他们的投票。措施的一致性定义为至少70%的受访者同意或强烈同意纳入一项措施。
很大一部分初步措施(89.5%)被确定具有评估医院恢复力的良好潜力。这些措施分为八个领域、17个子领域和43个指标。评分最高的指标(平均分)为:现场救援设备(4.7)、计划启动(4.6)、复杂护理需求患者转诊设备(4.5)、计划执行(4.4)、药物管理策略(4.4)、紧急医疗条件(4.4)、灾害委员会(4.4)、基本药物的库存类型和数量(4.4)、急诊床位的应急能力(4.4)和大规模伤亡分诊方案(4.4)。
该框架确定了一套全面的医院恢复力指标。它可用于医院评估,并为更好地应对未来灾害的优先实践提供参考。