优化腹腔感染抗生素使用的多方面干预措施。
Multifaceted intervention to optimize antibiotic use for intra-abdominal infections.
机构信息
Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, ON, Canada London Health Sciences, London, ON, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
出版信息
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2015 Apr;70(4):1226-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dku498. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
OBJECTIVES
Implementing evidence-based practice guidelines is challenging. We used a multifaceted, continuous educational approach to disseminate an up-to-date internal guideline adapted from published guidelines for management of intra-abdominal infections (IAI).
PATIENTS AND METHODS
The intervention consisted of continuing educational sessions, internal guideline pocket cards and posters with collaboration among all key stakeholders starting in December 2010. We emphasized risk stratification and the use of ceftriaxone/metronidazole for treatment of low-risk IAI, and discouraged the use of fluoroquinolones due to the high local resistance rates. We then compared patients with IAI before the intervention (April-November 2010) to those after implementation of the guideline (April-November 2011) in a surgical unit at a tertiary care teaching hospital in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. Antibiotic use was measured in in-hospital days of antibiotic therapy (DOT) per 1000 patient days (PD).
RESULTS
152 and 145 patients with IAI were included in the pre- and post-intervention periods, respectively. There was a significant reduction in the proportion of patients who received ciprofloxacin therapy from 74% to 34% (OR 0.18, 95% CI 0.11-0.31) and in DOT/1000 PD from 221 to 74 (OR 0.3, 95% CI 0.2-0.3). Also, a reduction in the DOT/1000 PD for piperacillin/tazobactam was seen (from 116 to 67; OR 0.6, 95% CI 0.5-0.7). There was an increase in the use of ceftriaxone from 1.3% to 53% of patients (OR 85, 95% CI 20-515) and from 6 to 92 DOT/1000 PD (OR 17, 95% CI 10-25). This change in practice was sustained over >2 years since the end of the active intervention, as shown in the unit-wide antimicrobial utilization data.
CONCLUSIONS
A multifaceted intervention aimed at all key stakeholders resulted in a high adherence to evidence-based treatment guidelines for IAI and has initiated a sustained culture change in prescribing of antibiotics.
目的
实施循证实践指南具有挑战性。我们采用了多方面、持续的教育方法,传播了最新的内部指南,该指南改编自已发表的腹腔内感染(IAI)管理指南。
患者和方法
干预措施包括从 2010 年 12 月开始,与所有利益攸关方合作开展继续教育课程、内部指南袖珍卡和海报。我们强调了风险分层和使用头孢曲松/甲硝唑治疗低危 IAI,并劝阻使用氟喹诺酮类药物,因为当地的耐药率很高。然后,我们在加拿大安大略省汉密尔顿的一家三级教学医院的外科病房中,比较了干预前(2010 年 4 月至 11 月)和实施指南后(2011 年 4 月至 11 月)IAI 患者的情况。抗生素使用以每 1000 个患者天(PD)的住院天(DOT)中的抗生素治疗天数(DOT)来衡量。
结果
分别有 152 例和 145 例 IAI 患者纳入干预前和干预后时期。接受环丙沙星治疗的患者比例从 74%降至 34%(OR 0.18,95%CI 0.11-0.31),DOT/1000PD 从 221 降至 74(OR 0.3,95%CI 0.2-0.3),这一比例显著降低。此外,哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的 DOT/1000PD 也有所减少(从 116 降至 67;OR 0.6,95%CI 0.5-0.7)。头孢曲松的使用率从 1.3%增加到 53%(OR 85,95%CI 20-515)和 6 至 92DOT/1000PD(OR 17,95%CI 10-25)。由于在积极干预结束后,该实践改变持续了两年多,因此在单位范围内的抗生素使用数据中也可以看到这一点。
结论
针对所有利益攸关方的多方面干预措施导致了对 IAI 循证治疗指南的高度遵守,并启动了抗生素处方规定的持续文化变革。