Suppr超能文献

干预措施以改善长期护理机构中抗生素的合理使用:系统评价。

Interventions to improve appropriate antibiotic prescribing in long-term care facilities: a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, Centre for Behaviour Change, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB, UK.

Institute of Education (IOE), University College London, London, WC1H 0NS, UK.

出版信息

BMC Geriatr. 2020 Jul 9;20(1):237. doi: 10.1186/s12877-020-01564-1.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Overuse of antibiotics has contributed to antimicrobial resistance; a growing public health threat. In long-term care facilities, levels of inappropriate prescribing are as high as 75%. Numerous interventions targeting long-term care facilities' antimicrobial stewardship have been reported with varying, and largely unexplained, effects. Therefore, this review aimed to apply behavioural science frameworks to specify the component behaviour change techniques of stewardship interventions in long-term care facilities and identify those components associated with improved outcomes.

METHOD

A systematic review (CRD42018103803) was conducted through electronic database searches. Two behavioural science frameworks, the Behaviour Change Wheel and Behaviour Change Technique Taxonomy were used to classify intervention descriptions into intervention types and component behaviour change techniques used. Study design and outcome heterogeneity prevented meta-analysis and meta-regression. Interventions were categorised as 'very promising' (all outcomes statistically significant), 'quite promising' (some outcomes statistically significant), or 'not promising' (no outcomes statistically significant). 'Promise ratios' (PR) were calculated for identified intervention types and behaviour change techniques by dividing the number of (very or quite) promising interventions featuring the intervention type or behaviour change technique by the number of interventions featuring the intervention type or behaviour change technique that were not promising. Promising intervention types and behaviour change techniques were defined as those with a PR ≥ 2.

RESULTS

Twenty studies (of19 interventions) were included. Seven interventions (37%) were 'very promising', eight 'quite promising' (42%) and four 'not promising' (21%). Most promising intervention types were 'persuasion' (n = 12; promise ratio (PR) = 5.0), 'enablement' (n = 16; PR = 4.33) and 'education' (n = 19; PR = 3.75). Most promising behaviour change techniques were 'feedback on behaviour' (n = 9; PR = 8.0) and 'restructuring the social environment' (e.g. staff role changes; n = 8; PR = 7.0).

CONCLUSION

Systematic identification of the active ingredients of antimicrobial stewardship in long-term care facilities was facilitated through the application of behavioural science frameworks. Incorporating environmental restructuring and performance feedback may be promising intervention strategies for antimicrobial stewardship interventions within long-term care facilities.

摘要

背景

抗生素的过度使用导致了抗菌药物耐药性的出现,这是一个日益严重的公共卫生威胁。在长期护理机构中,不适当处方的比例高达 75%。已经报道了许多针对长期护理机构抗菌药物管理的干预措施,但效果各不相同,且很大程度上无法解释。因此,本研究旨在应用行为科学框架来具体说明长期护理机构中抗菌药物管理干预措施的行为改变技术组成部分,并确定与改善结果相关的组成部分。

方法

通过电子数据库搜索进行了系统评价(CRD42018103803)。使用行为改变车轮和行为改变技术分类学这两个行为科学框架将干预描述分类为干预类型和使用的行为改变技术组成部分。由于研究设计和结果的异质性,无法进行荟萃分析和荟萃回归。将干预措施分为“非常有前景”(所有结果均具有统计学意义)、“相当有前景”(部分结果具有统计学意义)或“无前景”(无结果具有统计学意义)。通过将具有干预类型或行为改变技术的(非常或相当)有前景的干预数量除以具有干预类型或行为改变技术且无前景的干预数量,计算出为确定的干预类型和行为改变技术的“承诺比”(PR)。有前景的干预类型和行为改变技术被定义为 PR≥2 的那些类型和技术。

结果

共纳入 20 项研究(涉及 19 项干预措施)。其中 7 项干预措施(37%)为“非常有前景”,8 项干预措施(42%)为“相当有前景”,4 项干预措施(21%)为“无前景”。最有前景的干预类型是“说服”(n=12;PR=5.0)、“赋权”(n=16;PR=4.33)和“教育”(n=19;PR=3.75)。最有前景的行为改变技术是“行为反馈”(n=9;PR=8.0)和“重构社会环境”(例如,改变员工角色;n=8;PR=7.0)。

结论

通过应用行为科学框架,促进了长期护理机构中抗菌药物管理的有效成分的系统识别。在长期护理机构中实施抗菌药物管理干预措施时,纳入环境重构和绩效反馈可能是很有前景的干预策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验