Moe Sharon M, Abdalla Safa, Chertow Glenn M, Parfrey Patrick S, Block Geoffrey A, Correa-Rotter Ricardo, Floege Jürgen, Herzog Charles A, London Gerard M, Mahaffey Kenneth W, Wheeler David C, Dehmel Bastian, Goodman William G, Drüeke Tilman B
Indiana University School of Medicine and Roudebush Veterans Administration Medical Center, Indianapolis, Indiana;
Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California;
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Jun;26(6):1466-75. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014040414. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
Fractures are frequent in patients receiving hemodialysis. We tested the hypothesis that cinacalcet would reduce the rate of clinical fractures in patients receiving hemodialysis using data from the Evaluation of Cinacalcet HCl Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events trial, a placebo-controlled trial that randomized 3883 hemodialysis patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism to receive cinacalcet or placebo for ≤64 months. This study was a prespecified secondary analysis of the trial whose primary end point was all-cause mortality and non-fatal cardiovascular events, and one of the secondary end points was first clinical fracture event. Clinical fractures were observed in 255 of 1935 (13.2%) patients randomized to placebo and 238 of 1948 (12.2%) patients randomized to cinacalcet. In an unadjusted intention-to-treat analysis, the relative hazard for fracture (cinacalcet versus placebo) was 0.89 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.75 to 1.07). After adjustment for baseline characteristics and multiple fractures, the relative hazard was 0.83 (95% CI, 0.72 to 0.98). Using a prespecified lag-censoring analysis (a measure of actual drug exposure), the relative hazard for fracture was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.90). When participants were censored at the time of cointerventions (parathyroidectomy, transplant, or provision of commercial cinacalcet), the relative hazard was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.87). Fracture rates were higher in older compared with younger patients and the effect of cinacalcet appeared more pronounced in older patients. In conclusion, using an unadjusted intention-to-treat analysis, cinacalcet did not reduce the rate of clinical fracture. However, when accounting for differences in baseline characteristics, multiple fractures, and/or events prompting discontinuation of study drug, cinacalcet reduced the rate of clinical fracture by 16%-29%.
接受血液透析的患者经常发生骨折。我们利用盐酸西那卡塞治疗降低心血管事件评估试验的数据,检验了西那卡塞会降低接受血液透析患者临床骨折发生率的假设。该试验为一项安慰剂对照试验,将3883例患有继发性甲状旁腺功能亢进的血液透析患者随机分组,接受西那卡塞或安慰剂治疗≤64个月。本研究是该试验预先设定的一项次要分析,其主要终点为全因死亡率和非致命性心血管事件,次要终点之一为首次临床骨折事件。在随机分配至安慰剂组的1935例患者中,有255例(13.2%)发生临床骨折;在随机分配至西那卡塞组的1948例患者中,有238例(12.2%)发生临床骨折。在未经调整的意向性分析中,骨折的相对风险(西那卡塞与安慰剂相比)为0.89(95%置信区间[95%CI],0.75至1.07)。在对基线特征和多处骨折进行调整后,相对风险为0.83(95%CI,0.72至0.98)。采用预先设定的滞后删失分析(一种实际药物暴露的衡量方法),骨折的相对风险为0.72(95%CI,0.58至0.90)。当参与者在进行联合干预(甲状旁腺切除术、移植或提供市售西那卡塞)时被删失,相对风险为0.71(95%CI,0.58至0.87)。老年患者的骨折发生率高于年轻患者,西那卡塞在老年患者中的效果似乎更明显。总之,在未经调整的意向性分析中,西那卡塞并未降低临床骨折发生率。然而,在考虑基线特征、多处骨折和/或促使停用研究药物的事件差异后,西那卡塞使临床骨折发生率降低了16%-29%。