Holovko S V
Lik Sprava. 2013 Sep(6):72-8.
A total of 120 patients (60 vs 60 men in each group) were randomized. Median IPSS scores at 1 year follow-up were 11.8 ± 1.9 for PVP versus 7.8 ± 4.4 for TURP. Median length of stay was significantly shorter in the PVP group than in the TURP group, with a median of 2.4 ± 1.3 versus 4.2 ± 0.5, respectively (P < 0.01). Uroflowmetry parameters and complications were comparable in both groups. Sexual outcomes were better in the PVP group with statistical significance.
共有120例患者(每组60例男性)被随机分组。在1年随访时,经皮穿刺前列腺球囊扩张术(PVP)组的国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)中位数为11.8±1.9,而经尿道前列腺切除术(TURP)组为7.8±4.4。PVP组的住院时间中位数显著短于TURP组,分别为2.4±1.3天和4.2±0.5天(P<0.01)。两组的尿流率参数和并发症相当。PVP组的性功能结局更好,具有统计学意义。