Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kwei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou and Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kwei-Shan, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan; Graduate Institute of Clinical Medical Sciences, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.
Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Dec;53(4):471-5. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.08.002.
To evaluate the accessibility of transumbilical single-port laparoscopy for hysterectomy in difficult conditions.
This prospective observational study recruited patients with benign diseases who were scheduled for laparoscopic hysterectomy between March 2010 and October 2011 to undergo the transumbilical single-port approach with straight instruments and a laparoscope.
In total, 109 patients were included with a mean [± standard error of the mean (SEM)] age of 45.9 ± 0.4 years and mean body mass index of 23.9 ± 0.3 kg/m(2). The yielded mean uterine weight was 403.4 ± 25.3 g, with 28 (25.7%) weighing ≥500 g, including four specimens >1000 g, and 44 (40.4%) needed concurrent adhesiolysis. The operative time was 117.2 ± 4.2 minutes, estimated blood loss was 270.3 ± 22.9 mL, and the postoperative hospital stay was 2.8 ± 0.1 days. Patients with a uterus weighing ≥500 g had a higher intraoperative blood loss in comparison with those with a uterus weighing <500 g (375.4 ± 55.3 mL vs. 234.0 ± 23.0 mL; p < 0.05) and a higher incidence of blood transfusion (17.9% and 6.2%, respectively). The single-port approach was abandoned in four (3.7%) patients with severe pelvic adhesion--an additional port was opened for extensive adhesiolysis. None of the patients with a voluminous uterus needed an additional port. There were no major intraoperative or postoperative complications.
The single-port approach using straight, conventional laparoscopic instruments was feasible and safe in the majority of the patients undergoing hysterectomy, and was found to be accessible even in cases with a large uterus. The patients benefitted from this approach and had less abdominal wounds. However, patients with a voluminous uterus tended to have more intraoperative blood loss, and in some cases with severe adhesions, additional port(s) were required for surgical effectiveness.
评估经脐单孔腹腔镜在困难条件下子宫切除术的可操作性。
本前瞻性观察性研究招募了 2010 年 3 月至 2011 年 10 月期间因良性疾病拟行腹腔镜子宫切除术的患者,采用经脐单孔入路,使用直器械和腹腔镜进行操作。
共有 109 例患者纳入研究,平均年龄(±均数标准差)为 45.9 ± 0.4 岁,平均体重指数为 23.9 ± 0.3kg/m²。切除的子宫平均重量为 403.4 ± 25.3g,28 例(25.7%)重量≥500g,包括 4 例重量>1000g,44 例(40.4%)需要同时进行粘连松解。手术时间为 117.2 ± 4.2 分钟,估计出血量为 270.3 ± 22.9mL,术后住院时间为 2.8 ± 0.1 天。与子宫重量<500g 的患者相比,子宫重量≥500g 的患者术中出血量更高(375.4 ± 55.3mL 比 234.0 ± 23.0mL;p<0.05),输血发生率更高(17.9%比 6.2%)。由于严重盆腔粘连,有 4 例(3.7%)患者放弃了单孔入路,需要额外开一个端口进行广泛粘连松解。没有体积较大的子宫需要额外的端口。无术中或术后重大并发症发生。
使用直的常规腹腔镜器械进行经脐单孔入路在大多数行子宫切除术的患者中是可行和安全的,并且发现即使在子宫较大的情况下也是可行的。患者受益于这种方法,腹部伤口更少。然而,子宫体积较大的患者术中出血量往往较多,在一些严重粘连的情况下,需要额外的端口(多个端口)以确保手术效果。