Smith Samuel G, Kobayashi Lindsay C, Wolf Michael S, Raine Rosalind, Wardle Jane, von Wagner Christian
University College London, UK Queen Mary University of London, UK Northwestern University, USA
University College London, UK.
J Health Psychol. 2016 Aug;21(8):1665-75. doi: 10.1177/1359105314560919. Epub 2014 Dec 14.
We examined associations between numeracy and sociocognitive factors associated with colorectal cancer screening uptake (n = 964). Nearly half (45.7%) of the respondents incorrectly answered a numeracy question (low numeracy). Low numeracy respondents were less knowledgeable about colorectal cancer (p < .001), less positive towards screening (emotional, p < .001 and practical, p = .001) and less likely to intend to participate in screening (p = .001). They also reported greater defensive processing of cancer information (p = .001). Sociocognitive factors fully mediated the relationship between numeracy and screening intention. Addressing numeracy issues may reduce inequalities in CRC screening participation, but communication strategies could be limited by the tendency process cancer information defensively.
我们研究了与结直肠癌筛查接受情况相关的数字能力与社会认知因素之间的关联(n = 964)。近一半(45.7%)的受访者答错了一道数字能力问题(数字能力低)。数字能力低的受访者对结直肠癌的了解较少(p < 0.001),对筛查的积极性较低(情绪方面,p < 0.001;实际方面,p = 0.001),且参与筛查的意愿较低(p = 0.001)。他们还报告称对癌症信息的防御性处理更强(p = 0.001)。社会认知因素完全介导了数字能力与筛查意愿之间的关系。解决数字能力问题可能会减少结直肠癌筛查参与方面的不平等,但沟通策略可能会受到对癌症信息进行防御性处理倾向的限制。