Piachaud David
Department of Social Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science.
Br J Sociol. 2014 Dec;65(4):696-707. doi: 10.1111/1468-4446.12109.
Piketty's Capital (2014) primarily describes and analyses changes in the distribution of wealth and annual incomes. This paper focuses on his policy proposals that make up Part Four of the book. Piketty defends the 'social state' but he discusses it largely in terms of distribution and redistribution between tax units. This neglects the important role of social policy in promoting recognition and redistribution of income and opportunities that is related to gender, race, disability and sexual orientation. Nor does Piketty consider inequalities in health which effect life-time incomes, nor the impact of housing policies on house prices and the distribution of wealth. It is argued that Piketty's approach to social security is simplistic and plays down the complexity of competing policy goals. On taxation, Piketty defends progressive taxation and proposes a global capital levy. The latter proposal runs into formidable problems in seeking global taxation in a world of nation states. Rather than seeking a policy that is, for the foreseeable future, wholly politically impractical, a case is made for less idealistic but more practical and urgent tax coordination between nations to address the widespread avoidance of taxation that large corporations and the very wealthy are now permitted - taxation on which the future of the social state depends. The importance of human and social capital, which are largely set aside by Piketty, are discussed. Finally,it is argued that his approach to policy is to describe trends and propose amelioration of growing inequality rather than to identify causes of the trends and propose policies that might address the causes. Nevertheless, the importance of his work in bringing issues of inequality to the fore, especially among economists, is recognized and applauded.
皮凯蒂的《21世纪资本论》(2014年)主要描述和分析了财富分配及年收入的变化。本文聚焦于该书第四部分中的政策提议。皮凯蒂为“社会国家”进行辩护,但他主要是从税收单位之间的分配和再分配角度来讨论这一问题的。这忽视了社会政策在促进与性别、种族、残疾和性取向相关的收入和机会的认可与再分配方面的重要作用。皮凯蒂也没有考虑到影响终身收入的健康方面的不平等,以及住房政策对房价和财富分配的影响。有人认为,皮凯蒂对社会保障的处理方式过于简单,淡化了相互竞争的政策目标的复杂性。在税收方面,皮凯蒂为累进税辩护,并提议征收全球资本税。在一个由民族国家组成的世界中寻求全球税收时,后一项提议遇到了巨大的问题。与其寻求一项在可预见的未来完全不具政治可行性的政策,不如主张各国之间进行不那么理想化但更实际、更紧迫的税收协调,以解决目前大公司和富豪得以广泛避税的问题——社会国家的未来就依赖于这种税收。文中讨论了人力和社会资本的重要性,而皮凯蒂在很大程度上忽略了这一点。最后,有人认为,他的政策方法是描述趋势并提议改善日益加剧的不平等,而不是找出这些趋势的原因并提出可能解决这些原因的政策。尽管如此,他的著作在将不平等问题凸显出来方面的重要性,尤其是在经济学家当中,得到了认可和赞赏。