Lorencetti Karina Torales, Silva-Sousa Yara Teresinha Corrêa, Nascimento Gabriel Elias do, Messias Danielle Cristine Furtado, Colucci Vivian, Abi Rached-Junior Fuad, Silva Silvio Rocha Corrêa
Dental School, University of Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, SP, Brazil.
Braz Dent J. 2014 Sep-Oct;25(5):430-4. doi: 10.1590/0103-6440201302435.
This study aimed to evaluate, by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), the cleaning of canal walls with moderate curvature subjected to biomechanical preparation with different final diameters using apical negative pressure irrigation. Thirty-two mesiobuccal roots of molars were divided into 4 groups (n=8) according to the instrument's final diameter: GI: 30.02, GII: 35.02, GIII: 40.02 and GIV: 45.02. Irrigating procedure was performed at each change of instrument with 1% NaOCl using the Endovac system. Final irrigation was conducted with 17% EDTA for 5 min. The SEM photomicrographs were evaluated under 35× and 1000× magnification, by three calibrated examiners, in a double-blind design. Data were submitted to Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's post hoc tests (α=0.05). Canals instrumented with 30.02 and 35.02 final diameters showed more debris, statistically different from the other groups (p<0.05). Comparing each root canal third, for the cervical and apical portions no statistically significant difference (p>0.05) was found among the four groups. Regarding the presence of smear layer, canals with 30.02 final diameter showed the highest scores, statistically different from the 45.02 group (p<0.05) and similar to the 35.02 and the 40.02 groups (p>0.05). Although none of the studied diameters completely removed debris and smear layer, it may be concluded that instrumentation with higher final diameters was more effective in cleaning the root canals with moderate curvature.
本研究旨在通过扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估在使用根尖负压冲洗进行生物力学预备时,不同最终直径的器械对中度弯曲根管壁的清洁效果。将32颗磨牙的近中颊根根据器械的最终直径分为4组(n = 8):I组:30.02,II组:35.02,III组:40.02,IV组:45.02。每次更换器械时,使用Endovac系统用1%次氯酸钠进行冲洗。最后用17%乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)冲洗5分钟。SEM显微照片由三名经过校准的检查人员在双盲设计下,于35倍和1000倍放大倍数下进行评估。数据采用Kruskal-Wallis检验和Dunn事后检验(α = 0.05)。最终直径为30.02和35.02的根管显示出更多的碎屑,与其他组在统计学上有差异(p < 0.05)。比较每个根管的三段,四组之间在颈部和根尖部分未发现统计学上的显著差异(p > 0.05)。关于玷污层的存在,最终直径为30.02的根管得分最高,与45.02组在统计学上有差异(p < 0.05),与35.02组和40.02组相似(p > 0.05)。虽然所研究的直径均未完全清除碎屑和玷污层,但可以得出结论,最终直径较大的器械预备在清洁中度弯曲根管方面更有效。