• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

单人施救者的基本生命支持培训可有效提高其在无他人帮助时尽早拨打急救电话的意愿:一项交叉问卷调查研究。

Basic life support training for single rescuers efficiently augments their willingness to make early emergency calls with no available help: a cross-over questionnaire survey.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medical Science, Kanazawa University Graduate School of Medicine, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, 920-8641 Japan.

Department of Medical Science and Technology, Hiroshima International University, Hiroshima, Japan.

出版信息

J Intensive Care. 2014 Apr 24;2(1):28. doi: 10.1186/2052-0492-2-28. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.1186/2052-0492-2-28
PMID:25520840
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4267597/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to investigate effects of basic life support (BLS) training on willingness of single rescuers to make emergency calls during out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs) with no available help from others.

METHODS

A cross-over questionnaire survey was conducted with two questionnaires. Questionnaires were administered before and after two BLS courses in fire departments. One questionnaire included two scenarios which simulate OHCAs occurring in situations where help from other rescuers is available (Scenario-M) and not available (Scenario-S). The conventional BLS course was designed for multiple rescuers (Course-M), and the other was designed for single rescuers (Course-S).

RESULTS

Of 2,312 respondents, 2,218 (95.9%) answered all questions and were included in the analysis. Although both Course-M and Course-S significantly augmented willingness to make early emergency calls not only in Scenario-M but also in Scenario-S, the willingness for Scenario-M after training course was significantly higher in respondents of Course-S than in those of Course-M (odds ratio 1.706, 95% confidential interval 1.301-2.237). Multiple logistic regression analysis for Scenario-M disclosed that post training (adjusted odds ratio 11.6, 95% confidence interval 7.84-18.0), age (0.99, 0.98-0.99), male gender (1.77, 1.39-2.24), prior BLS experience of at least three times (1.46, 1.25-2.59), and time passed since most recent training during 3 years or less (1.80, 1.25-2.59) were independently associated with willingness to make early emergency calls and that type of BLS course was not independently associated with willingness. Therefore, both Course-M and Course-S similarly augmented willingness in Scenario-M. However, in multiple logistic regression analyses for Scenario-S, Course-S was independently associated with willingness to make early emergency calls in Scenario-S (1.26, 1.00-1.57), indicating that Course-S more efficiently augmented willingness. Moreover, post training (2.30, 1.86-2.83) and male gender (1.26, 1.02-1.57) were other independent factors associated with willingness in Scenario-S.

CONCLUSIONS

BLS courses designed for single rescuers with no help available from others are likely to augment willingness to make early emergency calls more efficiently than conventional BLS courses designed for multiple rescuers.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨基础生命支持(BLS)培训对单个救援人员在没有其他救援人员帮助的情况下拨打急救电话的意愿的影响。

方法

在消防部门进行了两次 BLS 课程后,采用交叉问卷调查的方式进行了问卷调查。调查问卷包括两个情景,模拟有其他救援人员帮助(情景-M)和没有其他救援人员帮助(情景-S)的情况下发生的院外心脏骤停(OHCA)。传统的 BLS 课程是为多名救援人员设计的(课程-M),另一个是为单人救援人员设计的(课程-S)。

结果

在 2312 名应答者中,有 2218 名(95.9%)回答了所有问题并纳入分析。虽然课程-M 和课程-S 都显著提高了不仅在情景-M 而且在情景-S 中进行早期紧急呼叫的意愿,但在课程-S 培训后的情景-M 中,课程-S 的应答者的意愿明显高于课程-M(优势比 1.706,95%置信区间 1.301-2.237)。对情景-M 的多变量逻辑回归分析显示,培训后(调整后的优势比 11.6,95%置信区间 7.84-18.0)、年龄(0.99,0.98-0.99)、男性(1.77,1.39-2.24)、至少三次以前的 BLS 经验(1.46,1.25-2.59)和 3 年内最近一次培训后(1.80,1.25-2.59)与早期紧急呼叫的意愿独立相关,BLS 课程类型与意愿不独立相关。因此,课程-M 和课程-S 都同样提高了情景-M 中的意愿。然而,在情景-S 的多变量逻辑回归分析中,课程-S 与情景-S 中进行早期紧急呼叫的意愿独立相关(1.26,1.00-1.57),表明课程-S 更有效地提高了意愿。此外,培训后(2.30,1.86-2.83)和男性(1.26,1.02-1.57)是与情景-S 中意愿相关的其他独立因素。

结论

为没有其他救援人员帮助的单人救援人员设计的 BLS 课程可能比为多名救援人员设计的传统 BLS 课程更有效地提高进行早期紧急呼叫的意愿。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bd2/4267597/9764c503bc24/40560_2013_35_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bd2/4267597/9764c503bc24/40560_2013_35_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bd2/4267597/9764c503bc24/40560_2013_35_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Basic life support training for single rescuers efficiently augments their willingness to make early emergency calls with no available help: a cross-over questionnaire survey.单人施救者的基本生命支持培训可有效提高其在无他人帮助时尽早拨打急救电话的意愿:一项交叉问卷调查研究。
J Intensive Care. 2014 Apr 24;2(1):28. doi: 10.1186/2052-0492-2-28. eCollection 2014.
2
Differential effects of ageing and BLS training experience on attitude towards basic life support.衰老和基本生命支持培训经验对基本生命支持态度的影响差异。
Resuscitation. 2011 May;82(5):577-83. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.01.022. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
3
Does the number of rescuers affect the survival rate from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests? Two or more rescuers are not always better than one.救援者的数量是否会影响院外心脏骤停的存活率?两个或更多的救援者并不总是比一个好。
Resuscitation. 2013 Feb;84(2):154-61. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.05.026. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
4
Factors associated with willingness to perform basic life support in the community setting in Yogyakarta, Indonesia.印度尼西亚日惹社区环境中进行基本生命支持意愿的相关因素。
Australas Emerg Care. 2023 Dec;26(4):303-307. doi: 10.1016/j.auec.2023.03.003. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
5
Readiness of University Students in Riyadh to Participate in Basic Life Support Programs: A Cross-Sectional Study.利雅得大学生参与基本生命支持计划的意愿:一项横断面研究。
Cureus. 2024 Jul 17;16(7):e64749. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64749. eCollection 2024 Jul.
6
The effect of basic life support education on laypersons' willingness in performing bystander hands only cardiopulmonary resuscitation.基础生命支持教育对非专业人员行单纯徒手心肺复苏意愿的影响。
Resuscitation. 2010 Jun;81(6):691-4. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.02.021. Epub 2010 Mar 26.
7
A Short Intervention and an Interactive e-Learning Module to Motivate Medical and Dental Students to Enlist as First Responders: Implementation Study.一项简短干预和互动电子学习模块,以激励医学生和牙科学员应征成为第一响应者:实施研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 18;24(5):e38508. doi: 10.2196/38508.
8
Mobile phone-assisted basic life support augmented with a metronome.配备节拍器的手机辅助基本生命支持
J Emerg Med. 2012 Sep;43(3):472-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.09.011. Epub 2012 Jan 17.
9
Geographical Association Between Basic Life Support Courses and Bystander Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Survival from OHCA in Denmark.丹麦基础生命支持课程与旁观者心肺复苏及院外心脏骤停患者生存率之间的地理关联。
Open Access Emerg Med. 2023 Jun 15;15:241-252. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S405397. eCollection 2023.
10
Do early emergency calls before patient collapse improve survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrests?患者发生心搏骤停前进行早期紧急呼救是否能提高院外心搏骤停后的生存率?
Resuscitation. 2015 Mar;88:20-7. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2014.11.028. Epub 2014 Dec 13.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of nationwide policy on citizens' awareness and willingness to perform bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation.全国性政策对公民意识和实施旁观者心肺复苏意愿的影响。
Resuscitation. 2013 Jul;84(7):889-94. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.01.009. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
2
Does the number of rescuers affect the survival rate from out-of-hospital cardiac arrests? Two or more rescuers are not always better than one.救援者的数量是否会影响院外心脏骤停的存活率?两个或更多的救援者并不总是比一个好。
Resuscitation. 2013 Feb;84(2):154-61. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.05.026. Epub 2012 Jun 15.
3
The continuous quality improvement project for telephone-assisted instruction of cardiopulmonary resuscitation increased the incidence of bystander CPR and improved the outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.
电话辅助指导心肺复苏术的持续质量改进项目提高了旁观者 CPR 的发生率,并改善了院外心脏骤停的结局。
Resuscitation. 2012 Oct;83(10):1235-41. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.02.013. Epub 2012 Feb 23.
4
Emergency medical service dispatch cardiopulmonary resuscitation prearrival instructions to improve survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association.紧急医疗服务调度心肺复苏术到达前指导以提高院外心脏骤停的生存率:美国心脏协会的科学声明
Circulation. 2012 Jan 31;125(4):648-55. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e31823ee5fc. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
5
In patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, does the provision of dispatch cardiopulmonary resuscitation instructions as opposed to no instructions improve outcome: a systematic review of the literature.在院外心脏骤停患者中,与不提供指令相比,提供调度心肺复苏指令是否能改善预后:文献系统评价。
Resuscitation. 2011 Dec;82(12):1490-5. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.09.004. Epub 2011 Sep 16.
6
CPR knowledge and attitude to performing bystander CPR among secondary school students in Norway.挪威中学生对实施旁观者心肺复苏术的知识和态度。
Resuscitation. 2011 Aug;82(8):1053-9. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.03.033. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
7
Differential effects of ageing and BLS training experience on attitude towards basic life support.衰老和基本生命支持培训经验对基本生命支持态度的影响差异。
Resuscitation. 2011 May;82(5):577-83. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2011.01.022. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
8
Part 1: Executive summary: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.第1部分:执行摘要:2010年心肺复苏与心血管急救科学及治疗建议国际共识。
Circulation. 2010 Oct 19;122(16 Suppl 2):S250-75. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970897.
9
Part 5: adult basic life support: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第五部分:成人基础生命支持:2010 年美国心脏协会心肺复苏和紧急心血管急救指南。
Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S685-705. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970939.
10
Part 4: CPR overview: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.第4部分:心肺复苏概述:2010年美国心脏协会心肺复苏及心血管急救指南
Circulation. 2010 Nov 2;122(18 Suppl 3):S676-84. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970913.