• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[德国肿瘤学指南计划(GGPO)中的质量评估——方法与实施]

[Measuring quality in the German Guideline Programme in Oncology (GGPO)—methodology and implementation].

作者信息

Nothacker Monika, Muche-Borowski Cathleen, Kopp Ina B

机构信息

AWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement (IMWi), Marburg, Deutschland.

AWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement (IMWi), Marburg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(8-9):470-80. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.09.021. Epub 2014 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.zefq.2014.09.021
PMID:25523845
Abstract

The German Guideline Programme in Oncology (GGPO) is a joint initiative between the German Cancer Society, the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany and German Cancer Aid. In accordance with the aims of the German National Cancer Plan, the GGPO supports the systematic development of high-quality guidelines. To enhance implementation and evaluation, the suggestion of performance measures (PMs) derived from guideline recommendations following a standardised methodology is obligatory within the GGPO. For this purpose, PM teams are convened representing the multidisciplinary guideline development groups including clinical experts, methodologists and patient representatives as well as those organisations that take an active part in and share responsibility for documentation and quality improvement, i.e., clinical cancer registries, certified cancer centres and, if appropriate, the institution responsible for external quality assurance according to the German Social Code (SGB). The primary selection criteria for PMs include strength of the underlying recommendation (strong, grade A), existing potential for improvement of care and measurability. The premises of data economy and standardised documentation are taken into account. Between May 2008 and July 2014, 12 guidelines with suggestions for 100 PMs have been published. The majority of the suggested performance measures is captured by the specific documentation requirements of the clinical cancer registries and certified cancer centres. This creates a solid basis for an active quality management and re-evaluation of the suggested PMs. In addition, the suspension of measures should be considered if improvement has been achieved on a broad scale and for a longer period in order to concentrate on a quality-oriented, economic documentation.

摘要

德国肿瘤学指南计划(GGPO)是德国癌症协会、德国科学医学协会联合会和德国癌症援助组织的一项联合倡议。根据德国国家癌症计划的目标,GGPO支持系统制定高质量指南。为加强指南的实施和评估,按照标准化方法从指南建议中推导绩效指标(PM)的建议在GGPO内是强制性的。为此,召集了PM团队,成员代表多学科指南制定小组,包括临床专家、方法学家和患者代表,以及积极参与文档记录和质量改进并承担相关责任的组织,即临床癌症登记处、认证癌症中心,以及在适用情况下,根据德国社会法典(SGB)负责外部质量保证的机构。PM的主要选择标准包括基础建议的强度(强,A级)、现有护理改进潜力和可测量性。同时考虑了数据经济性和标准化文档记录的前提条件。在2008年5月至2014年7月期间,已发布了12项指南及100项PM建议。大多数建议的绩效指标可通过临床癌症登记处和认证癌症中心的特定文档要求来获取。这为积极的质量管理和对建议的PM进行重新评估奠定了坚实基础。此外,如果已在广泛范围内且较长时间内实现了改进,为专注于以质量为导向的经济文档记录,应考虑暂停相关措施。

相似文献

1
[Measuring quality in the German Guideline Programme in Oncology (GGPO)—methodology and implementation].[德国肿瘤学指南计划(GGPO)中的质量评估——方法与实施]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2014;108(8-9):470-80. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2014.09.021. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
2
[The German Guideline Program in Oncology (GGPO): A central core of an evidence-based, patient-centered interdisciplinary oncology?].[德国肿瘤学指南项目(GGPO):以证据为基础、以患者为中心的跨学科肿瘤学的核心?]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(6):437-44. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.09.007. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
3
[(How) Are quality indicators for measuring and appraising the quality of healthcare derived from evidence-based clinical practice guidelines? A review].[(如何)从循证临床实践指南中得出用于衡量和评估医疗质量的质量指标?一项综述]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Nov;147-148:45-57. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.09.002. Epub 2019 Nov 10.
4
[Development of guideline-based quality indicators: a qualitative study on barriers and facilitating factors from the perspective of S3-guideline authors].[基于指南的质量指标的制定:从S3指南作者角度对障碍和促进因素的定性研究]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2019 Nov;147-148:34-44. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2019.09.001. Epub 2019 Nov 13.
5
[Quality management in oncology supported by clinical cancer registries].[临床癌症登记支持的肿瘤学质量管理]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(6):452-8. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.08.001. Epub 2015 Sep 6.
6
[Evaluation of oncology clinical practice guidelines: the contribution of certified centers].[肿瘤临床实践指南评估:认证中心的贡献]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2015;109(6):459-65. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Sep 16.
7
[Quality indicators for National Disease Management Guidelines using the example of the National Disease Management Guideline for "Chronic Heart Failure"].[以《国家疾病管理指南:慢性心力衰竭》为例的国家疾病管理指南质量指标]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2011;105(1):27-37. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2010.07.003.
8
[The German Guideline Clearinghouse on Breast Cancer: the need for frequent updating of breast cancer guidelines requires effective guideline updating procedures].[德国乳腺癌指南信息中心:乳腺癌指南频繁更新的需求需要有效的指南更新程序]
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2004 Aug;98(5):403-11.
9
[On the attractiveness, implementation and evaluation of guidelines].[关于指南的吸引力、实施与评估]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2013;107(2):164-9. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2013.02.004. Epub 2013 Mar 29.
10
[The German guideline clearing-project on bronchial asthma-part 1: Methodology and results of formal appraisal].[德国支气管哮喘指南清理项目——第1部分:形式评估的方法与结果]
Pneumologie. 2003 Aug;57(8):459-67. doi: 10.1055/s-2003-41546.

引用本文的文献

1
The Impact of Implementing Indicators of Quality of Oncological Care on Improving Patient Outcomes: A Cross-Sectional Review of Experiences from Countries Using Indicators in the Quality Assessment Process.实施肿瘤护理质量指标对改善患者结局的影响:对在质量评估过程中使用指标的国家的经验进行的横断面综述。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 18;17(8):1362. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081362.
2
International experiences in the development and implementation of guideline-based quality indicators: a qualitative study.国际上基于指南的质量指标的制定和实施经验:一项定性研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 19;11(1):e039770. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-039770.
3
Implementation of study results in guidelines and adherence to guidelines in clinical practice.
研究结果在指南中的实施以及临床实践中对指南的遵循。
GMS Curr Top Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Dec 15;15:Doc01. doi: 10.3205/cto000128. eCollection 2016.