Mahmoud Karim D, Nijsten Maarten W, Wieringa Wouter G, Ottervanger Jan P, Holmes David R, Hillege Hans L, van 't Hof Arnoud W, Lipsic Erik
Department of Cardiology, Thorax Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen , Groningen , The Netherlands .
Chronobiol Int. 2015 May;32(4):468-77. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2014.992527. Epub 2014 Dec 19.
Recent studies have reported on circadian variation in infarct size in ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. Controversy remains as to whether this finding indicates circadian dependence of myocardial tolerance to ischemia/reperfusion injury or that it can simply be explained by confounding factors such as baseline profile and ischemic time. We assessed the clinical impact and independent association between symptom onset time and infarct size, accounting for possible subgroup differences. From a multicenter registry, 6799 consecutive STEMI patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) between 2004 and 2010 were included. Infarct size was measured using peak creatine kinase (CK). Infarct size exhibited circadian variation with largest infarct size in patients with symptom onset around 03:00 at night (estimated peak CK 1322 U/l; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1217-1436) and smallest infarct size around 11:00 in the morning (estimated peak CK 1071 U/l; 95% CI: 1001-1146; relative reduction 19%; p = 0.001). Circadian variation in infarct size followed an inverse pattern in patients with prior myocardial infarction (p-interaction <0.001) and prior PCI (p-interaction = 0.006), although the later did not persist in multivariable analysis. Symptom onset time remained associated with infarct size after accounting for these interactions and adjusting for baseline characteristics and ischemic time. Symptom onset time did not predict one-year mortality (p = 0.081). In conclusion, there is substantial circadian variation in infarct size, which cannot be fully explained by variations in baseline profile or ischemic time. Our results lend support to the hypothesis of circadian myocardial ischemic tolerance and suggest a different mechanism in patients with prior myocardial infarction.
近期研究报道了ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者梗死面积的昼夜变化。对于这一发现是表明心肌对缺血/再灌注损伤的耐受性存在昼夜依赖性,还是仅仅可以用诸如基线特征和缺血时间等混杂因素来解释,目前仍存在争议。我们评估了症状发作时间与梗死面积之间的临床影响及独立关联,并考虑了可能的亚组差异。从一个多中心登记处纳入了2004年至2010年间连续接受直接经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的6799例STEMI患者。梗死面积采用肌酸激酶(CK)峰值进行测量。梗死面积呈现昼夜变化,症状发作于夜间03:00左右的患者梗死面积最大(估计CK峰值为1322 U/L;95%置信区间(CI):1217 - 1436),而上午11:00左右梗死面积最小(估计CK峰值为1071 U/L;95%CI:1001 - 1146;相对减少19%;p = 0.001)。既往有心肌梗死的患者(p交互作用<0.001)和既往有PCI的患者(p交互作用 = 0.006)梗死面积的昼夜变化呈相反模式,尽管后者在多变量分析中未持续存在。在考虑这些交互作用并调整基线特征和缺血时间后,症状发作时间仍与梗死面积相关。症状发作时间不能预测一年死亡率(p = 0.081)。总之,梗死面积存在显著的昼夜变化,这不能完全用基线特征或缺血时间的变化来解释。我们的结果支持昼夜心肌缺血耐受性的假说,并提示既往有心肌梗死的患者存在不同机制。