• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学和护士内镜医师结肠镜检查性能比较:亚洲的一项非劣效性随机对照研究。

Comparison of colonoscopic performance between medical and nurse endoscopists: a non-inferiority randomised controlled study in Asia.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

Institute of Digestive Disease, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Gut. 2015 Jul;64(7):1058-62. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306293. Epub 2014 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306293
PMID:25524261
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that trained nurse endoscopists are not inferior to medical endoscopists in finding adenomas during colonoscopy.

DESIGN

This is a prospective, randomised, single-blind, non-inferiority study comparing nurses with medical endoscopists in performing screening colonoscopy. The nurse endoscopists had been trained according to the British Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy curriculum and had completed at least 140 colonoscopic procedures prior to the study. The primary endpoint was the adenoma detection rate. Secondary endpoints included the caecal intubation rate, intubation time, complication rate, patient pain and satisfaction scores.

RESULTS

We enrolled and analysed a total of 731 patients over a 15-month period. At least one adenoma was found in 159 (43.8%) of 363 patients by nurse endoscopists and 120 (32.7%) of 367 patients by medical endoscopists and a proportion difference of +11.1% compared with the medical endoscopists (95% CI 4.1% to 18.1%). The withdrawal time was, however, significantly longer among nurses (998 vs 575 s, p<0.001). After adjusting for differences in a regression analysis, colonoscopy by nurses was associated with a lower adenoma detection rate (OR 0.475: 95% CI 0.311 to 0.725). Nurse endoscopists had a lower caecal intubation rate (97.3% vs 100%), received better pain and satisfaction scores and had a high rate of patient acceptance.

CONCLUSIONS

In this pragmatic trial, nurses can perform screening colonoscopy but require a longer procedural time to achieve a comparable adenoma detection rate as medical endoscopists.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01923155.

摘要

目的

验证受训护士内镜医师在结肠镜检查中发现腺瘤方面不逊于医学内镜医师的假设。

设计

这是一项前瞻性、随机、单盲、非劣效性研究,比较护士与医学内镜医师在进行筛查性结肠镜检查方面的表现。护士内镜医师按照英国联合胃肠内镜专家组(British Joint Advisory Group on GI Endoscopy)的课程接受培训,并在研究开始前完成了至少 140 例结肠镜检查。主要终点是腺瘤检出率。次要终点包括盲肠插管率、插管时间、并发症发生率、患者疼痛和满意度评分。

结果

在 15 个月的时间里,我们共纳入并分析了 731 例患者。在 363 例患者中,护士内镜医师发现至少 1 个腺瘤的患者有 159 例(43.8%),而医学内镜医师发现 120 例(32.7%),护士内镜医师与医学内镜医师相比,腺瘤检出率的差异为+11.1%(95%可信区间为 4.1%至 18.1%)。然而,护士的退镜时间明显更长(998 秒 vs 575 秒,p<0.001)。在回归分析中调整差异后,护士进行结肠镜检查与较低的腺瘤检出率相关(OR 0.475:95%可信区间 0.311 至 0.725)。护士内镜医师的盲肠插管率较低(97.3% vs 100%),疼痛和满意度评分较好,且患者接受度较高。

结论

在这项实用试验中,护士可以进行筛查性结肠镜检查,但需要更长的操作时间才能达到与医学内镜医师相当的腺瘤检出率。

试验注册号

NCT01923155。

相似文献

1
Comparison of colonoscopic performance between medical and nurse endoscopists: a non-inferiority randomised controlled study in Asia.医学和护士内镜医师结肠镜检查性能比较:亚洲的一项非劣效性随机对照研究。
Gut. 2015 Jul;64(7):1058-62. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2013-306293. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
2
Adenoma detection with cap-assisted colonoscopy versus regular colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial.圈套辅助结肠镜与常规结肠镜检查对腺瘤检出率的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Gut. 2012 Oct;61(10):1426-34. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301327. Epub 2011 Dec 20.
3
Colonoscopy training for nurse endoscopists: a feasibility study.护士内镜医师的结肠镜检查培训:一项可行性研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):688-95. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.09.028.
4
Volume and accreditation, but not specialty, affect quality standards in colonoscopy.数量和认证影响结肠镜检查的质量标准,但不影响专业水平。
Br J Surg. 2012 Oct;99(10):1436-44. doi: 10.1002/bjs.8866.
5
Nurse endoscopists perform colonoscopies according to the international standard and with high patient satisfaction.护士内镜医师按照国际标准进行结肠镜检查,患者满意度高。
Endoscopy. 2012 Dec;44(12):1127-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1310154. Epub 2012 Aug 28.
6
Factors Associated With Shorter Colonoscopy Surveillance Intervals for Patients With Low-Risk Colorectal Adenomas and Effects on Outcome.低风险大肠腺瘤患者结肠镜监测间隔较短的相关因素及其对结局的影响
Gastroenterology. 2017 Jun;152(8):1933-1943.e5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.02.010. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
7
One or two operator technique and quality performance of colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial.结肠镜检查的一或两名操作者技术与质量表现:一项随机对照试验
Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Jul;46(7):616-20. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.03.007. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
8
Split-dose preparation for colonoscopy increases adenoma detection rate: a randomised controlled trial in an organised screening programme.分剂量准备用于结肠镜检查可提高腺瘤检出率:一项在有组织筛查计划中的随机对照试验。
Gut. 2017 Feb;66(2):270-277. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2015-310685. Epub 2015 Dec 9.
9
Participation by experienced endoscopy nurses increases the detection rate of colon polyps during a screening colonoscopy: a multicenter, prospective, randomized study.经验丰富的内镜护士参与可提高筛查结肠镜检查中结肠息肉的检出率:一项多中心、前瞻性、随机研究。
Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Nov;74(5):1094-102. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.033. Epub 2011 Sep 1.
10
Colonoscopic withdrawal times and adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy.结肠镜检查筛查期间的结肠镜退出时间及腺瘤检出情况
N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 14;355(24):2533-41. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa055498.

引用本文的文献

1
Current methods of nurse-surgeon training and education: Systematic review.护士-外科医生培训与教育的现行方法:系统综述
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2021 Oct 15;3:100048. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2021.100048. eCollection 2021 Nov.
2
Impact of nurse-surgeons on patient-centred outcomes: A systematic review.护士-外科医生对以患者为中心的结局的影响:一项系统综述。
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2022 Jul 4;4:100086. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2022.100086. eCollection 2022 Dec.
3
The effect of nurse assisted colonoscopy on adenoma detection rates: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
护士辅助结肠镜检查对腺瘤检出率的影响:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2024 Jan 16;39(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04585-5.
4
Mobile colposcopy by trained nurses in a cervical cancer screening programme at Battor, Ghana.加纳巴托的宫颈癌筛查项目中,经过培训的护士进行移动阴道镜检查。
Ghana Med J. 2022 Sep;56(3):141-151. doi: 10.4314/gmj.v56i3.3.
5
Patient Preferences for Attributes that Characterise Alternative Models of Care in Gastroenterology: A Discrete Choice Experiment.患者对胃肠病学中替代护理模式特征属性的偏好:离散选择实验。
Patient. 2023 Mar;16(2):165-177. doi: 10.1007/s40271-022-00609-4. Epub 2023 Jan 13.
6
Nurse's Roles in Colorectal Cancer Prevention: A Narrative Review.护士在结直肠癌预防中的角色:叙事性综述。
J Prev (2022). 2022 Dec;43(6):759-782. doi: 10.1007/s10935-022-00694-z. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
7
Impact of the Joint Advisory Group on Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (JAG) on endoscopy services in the UK and beyond.胃肠内镜检查联合咨询小组(JAG)对英国及其他地区内镜检查服务的影响。
Frontline Gastroenterol. 2019 Apr;10(2):93-106. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2018-100969. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
8
Assessment of quality indicators among nurse practitioners performing upper endoscopy.对进行上消化道内镜检查的执业护士的质量指标评估。
Endosc Int Open. 2017 Sep;5(9):E818-E824. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-115384. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
9
Nursing's Potential to Address the Growing Cancer Burden in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.护理在应对低收入和中等收入国家日益加重的癌症负担方面的潜力。
J Glob Oncol. 2016 Feb 3;2(3):154-163. doi: 10.1200/JGO.2015.001974. eCollection 2016 Jun.
10
Non-Physician Endoscopy: How Far Can We Go?非医师内镜检查:我们能走多远?
Visc Med. 2016 Feb;32(1):13-20. doi: 10.1159/000443623. Epub 2016 Feb 10.