University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Francisco, California.
Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Mar 1;21(5):1098-105. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1948. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
Recent developments in rare-cell technology have led to improved blood-based assays that allow for the reliable detection, enumeration, and more recently, genomic profiling of circulating tumor cells (CTC). We evaluated two different approaches for enumeration of CTCs in a prospective therapeutic study of patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
The CellSearch system, a commercially available and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared assay for CTC enumeration, and IE/FC, an alternative method using EPCAM-based immunomagnetic enrichment and flow cytometry that maintains cell viability, were used to enumerate CTCs in the blood of patients with metastatic TNBC. CTC numbers were assessed at baseline and 7 to 14 days after initiation of therapy with cetuximab ± carboplatin in a phase II multicenter clinical trial (TBCRC 001).
CTC numbers from two methods were significantly correlated at baseline (r = 0.62) and at 7 to 14 days (r = 0.53). Baseline CTCs showed no association with time-to-progression (TTP), whereas CTCs at 7 to 14 days were significantly correlated with TTP (CellSearch P = 0.02; IE/FC P = 0.03). CTCs at both time points were significantly associated with overall survival (OS) [CellSearch: baseline (P = 0.0001) and 7 to 14 days (P < 0.0001); IE/FC: baseline (P = 0.0009) and 7 to 14 days (P = 0.0086)].
Our findings demonstrate that CTC enumeration by two different assays was highly concordant. In addition, results of both assays were significantly correlated with TTP and OS in patients with TNBC. The IE/FC method is also easily adapted to isolation of pure populations of CTCs for genomic profiling.
稀有细胞技术的最新发展使得基于血液的检测方法得以改进,这些方法能够可靠地检测、计数并最近对循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)进行基因组分析。我们在一项转移性三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)患者的治疗性研究中,评估了两种不同方法用于 CTC 计数的效果。
我们使用 CellSearch 系统(一种商业化的、获得美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的 CTC 计数检测方法)和 IE/FC(一种基于 EPCAM 的免疫磁珠富集和流式细胞术的替代方法,保持细胞活力),在一项多中心 II 期临床试验(TBCRC 001)中对转移性 TNBC 患者的血液中的 CTC 进行计数。在接受西妥昔单抗联合卡铂治疗 7 至 14 天后,评估基线和治疗开始后 7 至 14 天的 CTC 数量。
两种方法的 CTC 计数在基线时(r = 0.62)和 7 至 14 天时(r = 0.53)具有显著相关性。基线 CTC 与无进展生存期(TTP)无相关性,而 7 至 14 天的 CTC 与 TTP 显著相关(CellSearch:P = 0.02;IE/FC:P = 0.03)。在两个时间点,CTC 与总生存期(OS)显著相关[CellSearch:基线(P = 0.0001)和 7 至 14 天(P < 0.0001);IE/FC:基线(P = 0.0009)和 7 至 14 天(P = 0.0086)]。
我们的发现表明,两种不同检测方法的 CTC 计数高度一致。此外,两种检测方法的结果均与 TNBC 患者的 TTP 和 OS 显著相关。IE/FC 方法也易于适应 CTC 纯群体的基因组分析。