Suppr超能文献

[外周动脉闭塞性疾病治疗中的成本与成本效益——已被证实的是什么?]

[Cost and cost-effectiveness in the treatment of peripheral arterial occlusion disease - what is proven?].

作者信息

Torsello G, Bisdas T, Debus S, Grundmann R T

机构信息

Klinik für Vaskuläre und Endovaskuläre Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum und St. Franziskus-Hospital Münster, Deutschland.

Klinik und Poliklinik für Gefäßmedizin, Universitäres Herzzentrum GmbH, Hamburg, Deutschland.

出版信息

Zentralbl Chir. 2015 Feb;140(1):18-26. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1383241. Epub 2014 Dec 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

This overview comments on the health-care relevance of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) in patients with intermittent claudication (IC) and critical limb ischaemia (CLI). We evaluated different treatment modalities in terms of cost-effectiveness.

METHOD

For the literature review, the Medline database (PubMed) was searched under the key words "critical limb ischemia AND cost", "critical limb ischemia AND economy", "peripheral arterial disease AND cost", "peripheral arterial disease AND economy".

RESULTS

In the years 2005 to 2009, the hospitalisations of patients with PAOD rose disproportionately in Germany by 20 %, to 483,961 hospital admissions. By comparison, hospital admissions altogether increased by only 8 %. The average in-patient costs were estimated to be approximately € 5000 per PAOD-patient - a rather conservative estimate. For the patient with IC the economic data position is clear, supervised exercise training is by far the most cost-effective treatment option, followed by percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and finally the peripheral bypass. In accordance with the guidelines of the UK, the latter is therefore indicated only if PTA fails or is technically not possible. In patients with CLI, the situation is not obvious. Indeed, a short-term economic advantage can be calculated for the PTA, the long-term comparison of both methods, however, is impossible due to insufficient data. In addition, the risk factors for the patient have to be included in the calculation. This was indeed demonstrated in the short-term, but could not be analysed in the long-term follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The issue of greater cost-effectiveness of open or endovascular treatment in patients with CLI is uncertain, the studies and patient populations are too heterogeneous. Further studies are urgently needed to structure the sequence of the various treatment options in guidelines and clinical pathways.

摘要

背景

本综述阐述间歇性跛行(IC)和严重肢体缺血(CLI)患者外周动脉闭塞性疾病(PAOD)与医疗保健的相关性。我们从成本效益方面评估了不同的治疗方式。

方法

为进行文献综述,在Medline数据库(PubMed)中以“严重肢体缺血与成本”“严重肢体缺血与经济”“外周动脉疾病与成本”“外周动脉疾病与经济”为关键词进行检索。

结果

在2005年至2009年期间,德国PAOD患者的住院人数不成比例地增加了20%,达到483,961例住院人次。相比之下,住院总人次仅增加了8%。估计每位PAOD患者的平均住院费用约为5000欧元——这是一个较为保守的估计。对于IC患者,经济数据情况明确,有监督的运动训练是迄今为止最具成本效益的治疗选择,其次是经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA),最后是外周旁路手术。因此,根据英国的指南,仅在PTA失败或技术上不可行时才考虑后者。在CLI患者中,情况并不明显。确实,PTA可计算出短期经济优势,但由于数据不足,无法对两种方法进行长期比较。此外,计算时必须纳入患者的风险因素。这在短期内确实得到了证实,但在长期随访中无法进行分析。

结论

CLI患者开放或血管内治疗哪种更具成本效益的问题尚不确定,研究和患者群体过于多样化。迫切需要进一步的研究来确定指南和临床路径中各种治疗选择的顺序。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验