Benstead Tim J, Chalk Colin H, Parks Natalie E
Department ofMedicine,Division ofNeurology,DalhousieUniversity, Room3828Halifax Infirmary, 1796 Summer Street, Halifax, NS, B3H 3A7, Canada.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Dec 20;2014(12):CD010404. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010404.pub2.
Peripheral neuropathy is the most common neurologic complication of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. The pathophysiology of the neuropathy associated with HCV is not definitively known; however, proposed mechanisms include cryoglobulin deposition in the vasa nervorum and HCV-mediated vasculitis. The optimal treatment for HCV-related peripheral neuropathy has not been established.
To assess the effects of interventions (including interferon alfa, interferon alfa plus ribavirin, corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange, and rituximab) for cryoglobulinemic or non-cryoglobulinemic peripheral neuropathy associated with HCV infection.
On 26 August 2014, we searched the Cochrane Neuromuscular Disease Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE. We also searched two trials registers, the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations (NDLTD) (October 2014), and three other databases. We checked references in identified trials and requested information from trial authors to identify any additional published or unpublished data.
We included all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs involving participants with cryoglobulinemic or non-cryoglobulinemic peripheral neuropathy associated with HCV infection. We considered any intervention (including interferon alfa, interferon alfa plus ribavirin, corticosteroids, cyclophosphamide, plasma exchange, and rituximab) alone or in combination versus placebo or another intervention ('head-to-head' comparison study design) evaluated after a minimum interval to follow-up of at least six months.
We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Cochrane Collaboration. The planned primary outcome was change in sensory impairment (using any validated sensory neuropathy scale or quantitative sensory testing) at the end of the follow-up period. Other planned outcomes were: change in impairment (any validated combined sensory and motor neuropathy scale), change in disability (any validated disability scale), electrodiagnostic measures, number of participants with improved symptoms of neuropathy (global impression of change), and severe adverse events.
Four trials of HCV-related cryoglobulinemia fulfiled selection criteria and the review authors included three in quantitative synthesis. All studies were at high risk of bias. No trial addressed the primary outcome of change in sensory impairment. No trial addressed secondary outcomes of change in combined sensory and motor impairment, disability, or electrodiagnostic measures. A single trial of HCV-related mixed cryoglobulinemia treated with pegylated interferon alfa (peginterferon alfa), ribavirin, and rituximab versus peginterferon alfa and ribavirin did not show a significant difference in the number of participants with improvement in neuropathy at 36 months post treatment (risk ratio (RR) 4.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.27 to 59.31, n = 9). One study of interferon alfa (n = 22) and two studies of rituximab (n = 61) provided adverse event data. Severe adverse events were no more common with interferon alfa (RR 7.00, 95% CI 0.38 to 128.02) or rituximab (RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.13 to 67.06) compared to the control group.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of RCTs and quasi-RCTs addressing the effects of interventions for peripheral neuropathy associated with HCV infection. At present, there is insufficient evidence from RCTs and quasi-RCTs to make evidence-based decisions about treatment.
周围神经病变是丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染最常见的神经系统并发症。与HCV相关的神经病变的病理生理学尚不完全清楚;然而,提出的机制包括冷球蛋白在神经血管中的沉积以及HCV介导的血管炎。HCV相关周围神经病变的最佳治疗方法尚未确立。
评估干预措施(包括干扰素α、干扰素α联合利巴韦林、皮质类固醇、环磷酰胺、血浆置换和利妥昔单抗)对与HCV感染相关的冷球蛋白血症性或非冷球蛋白血症性周围神经病变的影响。
2014年8月26日,我们检索了Cochrane神经肌肉疾病小组专业注册库、Cochrane系统评价数据库、医学期刊数据库和荷兰医学文摘数据库。我们还检索了两个试验注册库,即学位论文网络数字图书馆(2014年10月),以及其他三个数据库。我们检查了已识别试验中的参考文献,并向试验作者索取信息,以识别任何其他已发表或未发表的数据。
我们纳入了所有涉及与HCV感染相关的冷球蛋白血症性或非冷球蛋白血症性周围神经病变参与者的随机对照试验(RCT)和半随机对照试验。我们考虑了任何单独或联合使用的干预措施(包括干扰素α、干扰素α联合利巴韦林、皮质类固醇、环磷酰胺、血浆置换和利妥昔单抗)与安慰剂或另一种干预措施(“头对头”比较研究设计),在至少六个月的最短随访间隔后进行评估。
我们采用了Cochrane协作网预期的标准方法程序。计划的主要结局是随访期结束时感觉障碍的变化(使用任何经过验证的感觉神经病变量表或定量感觉测试)。其他计划的结局包括:功能障碍的变化(任何经过验证的综合感觉和运动神经病变量表)、残疾的变化(任何经过验证的残疾量表)、电诊断指标、神经病变症状改善的参与者数量(整体变化印象)以及严重不良事件。
四项关于HCV相关冷球蛋白血症的试验符合选择标准,综述作者将三项纳入定量合成。所有研究都存在较高的偏倚风险。没有试验涉及感觉障碍变化的主要结局。没有试验涉及综合感觉和运动功能障碍、残疾或电诊断指标变化的次要结局。一项关于聚乙二醇化干扰素α(聚乙二醇干扰素α)、利巴韦林和利妥昔单抗治疗HCV相关混合冷球蛋白血症与聚乙二醇干扰素α和利巴韦林治疗的试验,在治疗后36个月时,神经病变改善的参与者数量上没有显示出显著差异(风险比(RR)4.00,95%置信区间(CI)0.27至59.31,n = 9)。一项关于干扰素α(n = 22)的研究和两项关于利妥昔单抗(n = 61)的研究提供了不良事件数据。与对照组相比,干扰素α(RR 7.00,95% CI 0.38至128.02)或利妥昔单抗(RR 3.00,95% CI 0.13至67.06)导致的严重不良事件并不更常见。
缺乏针对与HCV感染相关的周围神经病变干预效果的RCT和半随机对照试验。目前,RCT和半随机对照试验中没有足够的证据来做出基于证据的治疗决策。