Ye Cuilian, Yan Weiwei, Xiang Hua, He Hongxuan, Yang Maosheng, Ijaz Muhammad, Useh Nicodemus, Hsieh Ching-Lin, McDonough Patrick L, McDonough Sean P, Mohamed Hussni, Yang Zhibang, Chang Yung-Fu
Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America; School of Pharmacy and Bioengineering, Chongqing University of Technology, Chongqing, China; Department of Pathogenic Biology, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 19;9(12):e111367. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111367. eCollection 2014.
Animal leptospirosis is one of the most common zoonotic diseases in the United States and around the world. In a previous study, we applied four recombinant antigens, rLipL21, rLoa22, rLipL32 and rLigACon4-8 of Leptospira interrogans (L. interrogans) for the serological diagnosis of equine leptospirosis (Ye et al, Serodiagnosis of equine leptospirosis by ELISA using four recombinant protein markers, Clin. Vaccine. Immunol. 21:478-483). In this study, the same four recombinant antigens were evaluated for their potential to diagnose canine leptospirosis by ELISA. A total of 305 canine sera that were Leptospira microscopic agglutination test (MAT)-negative (n = 102) and MAT-positive (n = 203) to 5 serovars (Pomona, Grippotyphosa, Icterohaemorrhagiae, Canicola and Hardjo) were tested. When individual recombinant antigens were used, the sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were 97.5% and 84.3% for rLigACon4-8; 89.7% and 81.4% for rLoa22; 92.6% and 84.3% for rLipL32 and 99.5% and 84.3% for rLipL21, respectively compared to the MAT. The sensitivity and specificity of ELISA were, 92.6% and 91.2% for rLigACon4-8 and rLipL32, 97.5% and 84.3% for rLigACon4-8 and rLipL21, 89.7% and 87.3% for rLigACon4-8 and rLoa22, 89.7% and 87.3% to rLipL21 and rLoa22, 92.6% and 91.2% for rLipL21 and rLipL32 and 89.2% and 94.1% for rLoa22 and rLipL32 when one of the two antigens was test positive. The use of all four antigens in the ELISA assay was found to be sensitive and specific, easy to perform, and agreed with the results of the standard Leptospira Microscopic Agglutination test (MAT) for the diagnosis of canine leptospirosis.
动物钩端螺旋体病是美国和全球最常见的人畜共患病之一。在之前的一项研究中,我们应用问号钩端螺旋体(L. interrogans)的四种重组抗原rLipL21、rLoa22、rLipL32和rLigACon4-8进行马钩端螺旋体病的血清学诊断(Ye等人,使用四种重组蛋白标志物通过ELISA对马钩端螺旋体病进行血清学诊断,临床疫苗与免疫学21:478-483)。在本研究中,对这四种相同的重组抗原通过ELISA诊断犬钩端螺旋体病的潜力进行了评估。共检测了305份犬血清,这些血清经显微镜凝集试验(MAT)检测对5个血清型(波摩那型、犬型、黄疸出血型、犬伤寒型和哈焦型)呈阴性(n = 102)和阳性(n = 203)。当使用单个重组抗原时,与MAT相比,ELISA检测rLigACon4-8的敏感性和特异性分别为97.5%和84.3%;rLoa22为89.7%和81.4%;rLipL32为92.6%和84.3%;rLipL21为99.5%和84.3%。当两种抗原之一检测呈阳性时,ELISA检测rLigACon4-8和rLipL32的敏感性和特异性分别为92.6%和91.2%;rLigACon4-8和rLipL21为97.5%和84.3%;rLigACon4-8和rLoa22为89.7%和87.3%;rLipL21和rLoa22为89.7%和87.3%;rLipL21和rLipL32为92.6%和91.2%;rLoa22和rLipL32为89.2%和94.1%。发现在ELISA检测中使用所有四种抗原具有敏感性和特异性,易于操作,并且与诊断犬钩端螺旋体病的标准显微镜凝集试验(MAT)结果一致。