Soto-Adames Felipe N, Jordana Rafael, Baquero Enrique
Illinois Natural History Survey, University of Illinois, 1816 S. Oak St. Champaign, IL 61820
Department of Zoology and Ecology, University of Navarra, P.O. Box 177, 31080 Pamplona, Navarra, Spain.
J Insect Sci. 2014 Jan 1;14. doi: 10.1093/jisesa/ieu140. Print 2014.
Genera in subfamily Paronellinae have been grouped into five tribes, in part based on chaetotaxy. Tribes Bromacanthini, Paronellini, and Troglopedetini are characterized by having rounded scales and reduced or no macrochaetae, and although Bromacanthini harbors two well-differentiated genera, the core genera in tribes Paronellini and Troglopedetini form a homogeneous group where even generic diagnoses were, until recently, unclear. The genera assigned to Troglopedetini (Troglopedetes Absolon, Trogolaphysa Mills, and Cyphoderopsis Carpenter) harbor many species with reduced eyes number, whereas the tribe Paronellini (genera Paronella Schött, Dicranocentruga Wray and Campylothorax Schött) includes species with 6-8 eyes. Recent analyses of the chaetotaxy of Trogolaphysa and Cyphoderopsis suggest that these genera represent specialized forms related to species in Paronellini. The taxonomy of Troglopedetes, the type genus of Troglopedetini, is based almost exclusively on claw and mucro shape and dorsal macrochaetae pattern, and few details of the complete dorsal chaetotaxy of the species are known. This contribution presents a comparative analysis of the complete dorsal chaetotaxy of two species of Troglopedetes from Spain (one new to science), two new species of Trogolaphysa from the Dominican Republic and Martinique, and Campylothorax sabanus with the purpose of identifying aspects of the chaetotaxy that could provide diagnostic characters for the separation of Trogolaphysa and Troglopedetes, and a new diagnosis for tribe Troglopedetini. The analysis shows that neither the number of chaetae nor its organization or pattern of macrochaeta provides diagnostic differences between Trogolaphysa and Troglopedetes. It is also concluded that the separation of Paronellini and Troglopedetini is not justified. Troglopedetini is here synonymized with Paronellini, and a new diagnosis of Paronellini is provided.
帕罗内利纳亚科的属被分为五个族,部分是基于毛序。布罗马坎蒂尼族、帕罗内利尼族和洞穴佩德蒂尼族的特征是具有圆形鳞片且大刚毛减少或没有,虽然布罗马坎蒂尼族有两个差异明显的属,但帕罗内利尼族和洞穴佩德蒂尼族的核心属形成了一个同质群体,直到最近,甚至属的诊断都不明确。归入洞穴佩德蒂尼族的属(洞穴佩德蒂斯属阿勃索隆、洞穴拉菲亚属米尔斯和弯胸佩德opsis属卡彭特)有许多眼睛数量减少的物种,而帕罗内利尼族(帕罗内拉属朔特、双角突属雷和弯胸属朔特)包括有6 - 8只眼睛的物种。最近对洞穴拉菲亚属和弯胸佩德opsis属毛序的分析表明,这些属代表了与帕罗内利尼族物种相关的特化形式。洞穴佩德蒂斯属是洞穴佩德蒂尼族的模式属,其分类几乎完全基于爪和端刺的形状以及背侧大刚毛模式,该属物种完整的背侧毛序细节所知甚少。本论文对来自西班牙的两种洞穴佩德蒂斯属(一种为新物种)、来自多米尼加共和国和马提尼克岛的两种新洞穴拉菲亚属以及萨巴弯胸属进行了完整背侧毛序的比较分析,目的是确定毛序中可为区分洞穴拉菲亚属和洞穴佩德蒂斯属提供诊断特征的方面,以及为洞穴佩德蒂尼族提供新的诊断。分析表明,刚毛数量、其组织或大刚毛模式都不能提供洞穴拉菲亚属和洞穴佩德蒂斯属之间的诊断差异。还得出结论,将帕罗内利尼族和洞穴佩德蒂尼族分开是不合理的。在此,洞穴佩德蒂尼族与帕罗内利尼族同义,并提供了帕罗内利尼族的新诊断。