Suppr超能文献

粪便免疫化学检测的前瞻性横断面研究:获得结直肠癌同等敏感性的性别特异性临界值?

Prospective cross-sectional study on faecal immunochemical tests: sex specific cut-off values to obtain equal sensitivity for colorectal cancer?

作者信息

van Turenhout Sietze T, Oort Frank A, van der Hulst René W M, Visscher Arjen P, Terhaar sive Droste Jochim S, Scholten Pieter, Bouman Anneke A, Meijer Gerrit A, Mulder Chris J J, van Rossum Leo G M, Coupé Veerle M H

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VU University Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, the Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Dec 21;14:217. doi: 10.1186/s12876-014-0217-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are commonly used in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Diagnostic accuracy of FIT differs between males and females. This so far unexplained difference could result in a dissimilarity in screening outcome between both sexes. The aim of this study is to compare sensitivity and specificity of a FIT between males and females, and study potential explanatory variables.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, data were prospectively collected. 3,022 subjects performed a FIT prior to complete colonoscopy. Sensitivity, specificity, and ROC curves were compared for both sexes. Potential explanatory variables of the relation between sensitivity and sex were explored.

RESULTS

At all cut-off values, FIT sensitivity for CRC was higher (range 13-23%) and specificity was lower (range 2-4%) in males compared to females. At 75 ng/ml, sensitivity for CRC was 93% in males compared to 71% in females (p = 0.03), and specificity was 90% in males compared to 93% in females (p = <0.05). For advanced adenomas, males had a slightly higher sensitivity and lower specificity (not significant). At 75 ng/ml, sensitivity for advanced adenomas was 33% in males compared to 29% in females (p = 0.46), and specificity was 93% in males compared to 95% in females (p = 0.22). ROC curves were similar for both sexes, and equal combinations of sensitivity and specificity could be achieved by adjusting the cut-off values. For CRC, the difference in sensitivity could not be explained by age or location of the tumour.

CONCLUSIONS

FIT has a higher sensitivity and a lower specificity for CRC in males than in females. Equal test characteristics can be achieved by allowing separate cut-off values for both sexes. Location and age do not explain the observed differences in sensitivity.

摘要

背景

粪便免疫化学检测(FIT)常用于结直肠癌(CRC)筛查。FIT的诊断准确性在男性和女性之间存在差异。这种迄今为止尚未得到解释的差异可能导致两性筛查结果的不同。本研究的目的是比较男性和女性FIT的敏感性和特异性,并研究潜在的解释变量。

方法

在这项横断面研究中,前瞻性地收集数据。3022名受试者在进行全结肠镜检查之前进行了FIT检测。比较了两性的敏感性、特异性和ROC曲线。探索了敏感性与性别之间关系的潜在解释变量。

结果

在所有临界值下,与女性相比,男性FIT对CRC的敏感性更高(范围为13%-23%),特异性更低(范围为2%-4%)。在75 ng/ml时,男性对CRC的敏感性为93%,而女性为71%(p = 0.03),男性的特异性为90%,女性为93%(p < 0.05)。对于高级别腺瘤,男性的敏感性略高,特异性略低(无统计学意义)。在75 ng/ml时,男性对高级别腺瘤的敏感性为33%,女性为29%(p = 0.46),男性的特异性为93%,女性为95%(p = 0.22)。两性的ROC曲线相似,通过调整临界值可以实现敏感性和特异性的相同组合。对于CRC,敏感性的差异无法用肿瘤的年龄或位置来解释。

结论

FIT对男性CRC的敏感性高于女性,特异性低于女性。通过允许两性采用不同的临界值,可以实现相同的检测特征。肿瘤位置和年龄无法解释观察到的敏感性差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5200/4302436/d6554f21ea14/12876_2014_217_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验