Bağder Elmaci Simel, Gülgör Gökşen, Tokatli Mehmet, Erten Hüseyin, İşci Asli, Özçelik Filiz
Department of Food Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey,
Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015 Mar;107(3):675-86. doi: 10.1007/s10482-014-0362-6. Epub 2014 Dec 21.
The antimicrobial action of chitosan against wine related microorganisms, including Lactobacillus plantarum, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Oeonococcus oeni, Lactobacillus hilgardii, Brettanomyces bruxellensis, Hanseniaspora uvarum and Zygosaccharomyces bailii was examined in laboratory media. In order to assess the potential applicability of chitosan as a microbial control agent for wine, the effect of chitosan, applied individually and/or in combination with sulphur dioxide (SO2), on the growth of microorganisms involved in various stages of winemaking and on the fermentative performance of S. cerevisiae was investigated. Of the seven wine-related microorganisms studied, S. cerevisiae exhibited the strongest resistance to antimicrobial action of chitosan in laboratory media with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) greater than 2 g/L. L. hilgardii, O. oeni and B. bruxellensis were the most susceptible to chitosan since they were completely inactivated by chitosan at 0.2 g/L. The MIC of chitosan for L. plantarum, H. uvarum and Z. bailii was 2, 0.4 and 0.4 g/L, respectively. In wine experiments, it was found that chitosan had a retarding effect on alcoholic fermentation without significantly altering the viability and the fermentative performance of S. cerevisiae. With regard to non-Saccharomyces yeasts (H. uvarum and Z. bailii) involved in winemaking, the early deaths of these yeasts in mixed cultures with S. cerevisiae were not probably due to the antimicrobial action of chitosan but rather due to ethanol produced by the yeasts. The complex interactions between chitosan and wine ingredients as well as microbial interactions during wine fermentation considerably affect the efficacy of chitosan. It was concluded that chitosan was worthy of further investigation as an alternative or complementary preservative to SO2 in wine industry.
在实验室培养基中研究了壳聚糖对葡萄酒相关微生物的抗菌作用,这些微生物包括植物乳杆菌、酿酒酵母、酒类酒球菌、希氏乳杆菌、布鲁塞尔酒香酵母、葡萄汁有孢汉逊酵母和拜耳接合酵母。为了评估壳聚糖作为葡萄酒微生物控制剂的潜在适用性,研究了单独使用壳聚糖和/或与二氧化硫(SO₂)联合使用时,壳聚糖对参与葡萄酒酿造各个阶段的微生物生长以及酿酒酵母发酵性能的影响。在所研究的七种葡萄酒相关微生物中,酿酒酵母在实验室培养基中对壳聚糖的抗菌作用表现出最强的抗性,其最小抑菌浓度(MIC)大于2 g/L。希氏乳杆菌、酒类酒球菌和布鲁塞尔酒香酵母对壳聚糖最敏感,因为它们在0.2 g/L的壳聚糖作用下完全失活。壳聚糖对植物乳杆菌、葡萄汁有孢汉逊酵母和拜耳接合酵母的MIC分别为2、0.4和0.4 g/L。在葡萄酒实验中发现,壳聚糖对酒精发酵有延缓作用,但不会显著改变酿酒酵母的活力和发酵性能。对于参与葡萄酒酿造的非酿酒酵母(葡萄汁有孢汉逊酵母和拜耳接合酵母),它们在与酿酒酵母的混合培养物中的早期死亡可能不是由于壳聚糖的抗菌作用,而是由于酵母产生的乙醇。壳聚糖与葡萄酒成分之间的复杂相互作用以及葡萄酒发酵过程中的微生物相互作用,极大地影响了壳聚糖的功效。得出的结论是,壳聚糖作为葡萄酒行业中二氧化硫的替代或补充防腐剂值得进一步研究。