Denno Donna M, Hoopes Andrea J, Chandra-Mouli Venkatraman
Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; Department of Global Health, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
J Adolesc Health. 2015 Jan;56(1 Suppl):S22-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.09.012.
Access to youth friendly health services is vital for ensuring sexual and reproductive health (SRH) and well-being of adolescents. This study is a descriptive review of the effectiveness of initiatives to improve adolescent access to and utilization of sexual and reproductive health services (SRHS) in low- and middle-income countries. We examined four SRHS intervention types: (1) facility based, (2) out-of-facility based, (3) interventions to reach marginalized or vulnerable populations, (4) interventions to generate demand and/or community acceptance. Outcomes assessed across the four questions included uptake of SRHS or sexual and reproductive health commodities and sexual and reproductive health biologic outcomes. There is limited evidence to support the effectiveness of initiatives that simply provide adolescent friendliness training for health workers. Data are most ample (10 initiatives demonstrating weak but positive effects and one randomized controlled trial demonstrating strong positive results on some outcome measures) for approaches that use a combination of health worker training, adolescent-friendly facility improvements, and broad information dissemination via the community, schools, and mass media. We found a paucity of evidence on out-of-facility-based strategies, except for those delivered through mixed-use youth centers that demonstrated that SRHS in these centers are neither well used nor effective at improving SRH outcomes. There was an absence of studies or evaluations examining outcomes among vulnerable or marginalized adolescents. Findings from 17 of 21 initiatives assessing demand-generation activities demonstrated at least some association with adolescent SRHS use. Of 15 studies on parental and other community gatekeepers' approval of SRHS for adolescents, which assessed SRHS/commodity uptake and/or biologic outcomes, 11 showed positive results. Packages of interventions that train health workers, improve facility adolescent friendliness, and endeavor to generate demand through multiple channels are ready for large-scale implementation. However, further evaluation of these initiatives is needed to clarify mechanisms and impact, especially of specific program components. Quality research is needed to determine effective means to deliver services outside the facilities, to reach marginalized or vulnerable adolescents, and to determine effective approaches to increase community acceptance of adolescent SRHS.
获得对青少年友好的卫生服务对于确保青少年的性与生殖健康(SRH)及福祉至关重要。本研究是一项描述性综述,旨在评估中低收入国家为改善青少年获得和利用性与生殖健康服务(SRHS)所采取举措的有效性。我们考察了四种SRHS干预类型:(1)基于机构的干预;(2)机构外的干预;(3)针对边缘化或脆弱人群的干预;(4)旨在产生需求和/或社区接受度的干预。针对四个问题评估的结果包括SRHS或性与生殖健康用品的使用情况以及性与生殖健康生物学结果。仅有有限的证据支持仅为卫生工作者提供青少年友好型培训举措的有效性。对于采用卫生工作者培训、改善青少年友好型机构设施以及通过社区、学校和大众媒体进行广泛信息传播相结合方法的研究数据最为丰富(10项举措显示出微弱但积极的效果,1项随机对照试验在某些结果指标上显示出强烈的积极结果)。除了通过综合利用青年中心实施的干预措施外,我们发现关于机构外策略的证据很少,而这些中心的情况表明,其中的SRHS使用情况不佳,在改善SRH结果方面也无效。缺乏针对脆弱或边缘化青少年结果的研究或评估。在评估需求产生活动的21项举措中,有17项的结果表明至少与青少年SRHS的使用存在某种关联。在15项关于父母和其他社区把关人对青少年SRHS认可情况的研究中,这些研究评估了SRHS/用品的使用情况和/或生物学结果,其中11项显示出积极结果。培训卫生工作者、改善机构对青少年的友好程度并努力通过多种渠道产生需求的一揽子干预措施已准备好大规模实施。然而,需要对这些举措进行进一步评估,以阐明其机制和影响,特别是具体项目组成部分的机制和影响。需要开展高质量研究,以确定在机构外提供服务、覆盖边缘化或脆弱青少年以及确定提高社区对青少年SRHS接受度的有效方法。