Suppr超能文献

电针与吗啡介导的镇痛模式在足底切口诱导疼痛模型中的比较。

Comparison of electroacupuncture and morphine-mediated analgesic patterns in a plantar incision-induced pain model.

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

Department of Anesthesiology, School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.

出版信息

Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:659343. doi: 10.1155/2014/659343. Epub 2014 Nov 2.

Abstract

Electroacupuncture (EA) is a complementary therapy to improve morphine analgesia for postoperative pain, but underlying mechanism is not well-known. Herein, we investigated EA-induced analgesic effect in a plantar incision (PI) model in male Sprague-Dawley rats. PI was performed at the left hind paw. EA of 4 Hz and high intensity or sham needling was conducted at right ST36 prior to PI and repeated for another 2 days. Behavioral responses to mechanical and thermal stimuli, spinal phospho-ERK, and Fos expression were all analyzed. In additional groups, naloxone and morphine were administered to elucidate involvement of opioid receptors and for comparison with EA. EA pretreatment significantly reduced post-PI tactile allodynia for over 1 day; repeated treatments maintained analgesic effect. Intraperitoneal naloxone could reverse EA analgesia. Low-dose subcutaneous morphine (1 mg/kg) had stronger inhibitory effect on PI-induced allodynia than EA for 1 h. However, analgesic tolerance appeared after repeated morphine injections. Both EA and morphine could equally inhibit PI-induced p-ERK and Fos inductions. We conclude that though EA and morphine attenuate postincision pain through opioid receptor activations, daily EA treatments result in analgesic accumulation whereas daily morphine injections develop analgesic tolerance. Discrepant pathways and mechanisms underlying two analgesic means may account for the results.

摘要

电针(EA)是一种辅助疗法,可以改善吗啡对术后疼痛的镇痛作用,但其潜在机制尚不清楚。在此,我们在雄性 Sprague-Dawley 大鼠足底切口(PI)模型中研究了 EA 诱导的镇痛作用。在左后爪进行 PI。在 PI 之前,在右侧 ST36 进行 4 Hz 和高强度的 EA 或假针刺,并在另外 2 天重复进行。分析了机械和热刺激的行为反应、脊髓磷酸化 ERK 和 Fos 的表达。在另外的组中,给予纳洛酮和吗啡以阐明阿片受体的参与并与 EA 进行比较。EA 预处理可显著减轻 PI 后 1 天以上的触觉过敏;重复治疗维持镇痛效果。腹腔内纳洛酮可逆转 EA 镇痛作用。小剂量皮下吗啡(1 mg/kg)在 1 小时内对 PI 诱导的痛觉过敏的抑制作用强于 EA。然而,重复注射吗啡后出现镇痛耐受。EA 和吗啡都可以抑制 PI 诱导的 p-ERK 和 Fos 诱导。我们得出结论,尽管 EA 和吗啡通过激活阿片受体来减轻切口后疼痛,但每日 EA 治疗会导致镇痛积累,而每日吗啡注射则会产生镇痛耐受。两种镇痛手段的不同途径和机制可能是导致这些结果的原因。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1bee/4233674/4c340b348d49/ECAM2014-659343.001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验