• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国发表的护理干预系统评价的流行病学、方法学及报告特征

Epidemiology, methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China.

作者信息

Shi Chunhu, Zhu Lin, Wang Xue, Qin Chunxia, Xu Qi, Tian Jinhui

机构信息

Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu, China.

出版信息

Int J Nurs Pract. 2014 Dec;20(6):689-700. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12255.

DOI:10.1111/ijn.12255
PMID:25532885
Abstract

The importance of systematic reviews (SRs) of nursing interventions' impact on practice makes their methodological quality and reporting characteristics especially important as it directly influence their utility for clinicians, patients and policy makers.The study aims to assess the methodological quality and reporting characteristics of SRs of nursing interventions in Chinese nursing journals. Three Chinese databases were searched for SRs of nursing interventions from inception to October 2011. The assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR) and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses (PRISMA) statements were used to assess methodological quality and reporting characteristics. Seventy-four SRs were included. The proportion of SRs complying with AMSTAR checklist items ranged from 0% to 82.4%. No SRs reported an 'a priori' design or conflict of interest. Only four items were found to be reported in more than 50% of the SRs: a list of included and excluded studies, the scientific quality of included studies, the appropriate use of methods to combine findings, and formulating conclusions appropriately. The majority of SRs of nursing interventions in China had major methodological and reporting flaws that limited their value to guide decisions. Chinese authors and journals should adopt and keep up with the AMSTAR and PRISMA statements to improve the quality of SRs in this field.

摘要

系统评价(SRs)对护理实践影响的重要性使得其方法学质量和报告特征尤为重要,因为这直接影响到它们对临床医生、患者和政策制定者的实用性。本研究旨在评估中文护理期刊中护理干预系统评价的方法学质量和报告特征。检索了三个中文数据库,以获取从创刊至2011年10月的护理干预系统评价。采用多种系统评价的评估(AMSTAR)和系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明来评估方法学质量和报告特征。纳入了74篇系统评价。符合AMSTAR清单条目的系统评价比例从0%到82.4%不等。没有系统评价报告“预先”设计或利益冲突。仅发现超过50%的系统评价报告了四项内容:纳入和排除研究的清单、纳入研究的科学质量、合并结果的方法的适当使用以及结论的恰当形成。中国护理干预的大多数系统评价存在重大的方法学和报告缺陷,限制了它们指导决策的价值。中国作者和期刊应采用并跟上AMSTAR和PRISMA声明,以提高该领域系统评价的质量。

相似文献

1
Epidemiology, methodological and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of nursing interventions published in China.中国发表的护理干预系统评价的流行病学、方法学及报告特征
Int J Nurs Pract. 2014 Dec;20(6):689-700. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12255.
2
Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.发表于中文期刊的护理干预系统评价和Meta分析的流行病学、质量及报告特征
Nurs Outlook. 2015 Jul-Aug;63(4):446-455.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2014.11.020. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
3
Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.阿尔茨海默病患者护理干预的系统评价和荟萃分析的报告和方法学质量:研究结果的普遍意义。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 May;51(3):308-316. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12462. Epub 2019 Feb 25.
4
Epidemiology characteristics, reporting characteristics, and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on traditional Chinese medicine nursing interventions published in Chinese journals.中文期刊发表的关于中医护理干预的系统评价和Meta分析的流行病学特征、报告特征及方法学质量
Int J Nurs Pract. 2017 Feb;23(1). doi: 10.1111/ijn.12498. Epub 2016 Dec 21.
5
Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.系统评价治疗抑郁症方法学质量的横断面研究。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018 Dec;27(6):619-627. doi: 10.1017/S2045796017000208. Epub 2017 May 2.
6
Epidemiology, quality, and reporting characteristics of systematic reviews of acupuncture interventions published in Chinese journals.中文期刊发表的针灸干预系统评价的流行病学、质量和报告特征。
J Altern Complement Med. 2012 Sep;18(9):813-7. doi: 10.1089/acm.2011.0274.
7
Endorsement of PRISMA statement and quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in nursing journals: a cross-sectional study.护理期刊发表的系统评价和荟萃分析对PRISMA声明的认可情况及质量:一项横断面研究
BMJ Open. 2017 Feb 7;7(2):e013905. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013905.
8
Methodological and Reporting Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Highest Ranking Journals in the Field of Pain.疼痛领域排名最高期刊发表的系统评价的方法学和报告质量。
Anesth Analg. 2017 Oct;125(4):1348-1354. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002227.
9
Reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews in the orthopaedic literature.骨科文献中系统评价的报告和方法学质量。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013 Jun 5;95(11):e771-7. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00597.
10
Clinical Epidemiology in China series. Paper 3: The methodological and reporting quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published by China' researchers in English-language is higher than those published in Chinese-language.中国临床流行病学系列。第 3 篇:中国研究者发表的英文系统评价和荟萃分析的方法学和报告质量高于中文发表的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2021 Dec;140:178-188. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.08.014. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

引用本文的文献

1
The reporting and methodological quality of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of nursing interventions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease - A systematic review.系统评价和荟萃分析中护理干预慢性阻塞性肺疾病的报告和方法学质量 - 系统评价。
Nurs Open. 2021 May;8(3):1489-1500. doi: 10.1002/nop2.767. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
2
Quality assessment of systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Saudi journals from 1997 to 2017.1997年至2017年沙特期刊发表的系统评价和荟萃分析的质量评估
Saudi Med J. 2019 May;40(5):426-431. doi: 10.15537/smj.2019.5.23690.
3
Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review.
评价系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明及其扩展的采用和影响:范围综述。
Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 19;6(1):263. doi: 10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8.