Suppr超能文献

接受第三次或更多次导管消融治疗心房颤动患者的电生理检查结果及长期预后

Electrophysiologic findings and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing third or more catheter ablation procedures for atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Lin David, Santangeli Pasquale, Zado Erica S, Bala Rupa, Hutchinson Mathew D, Riley Michael P, Frankel David S, Garcia Fermin, Dixit Sanjay, Callans David J, Marchlinski Francis E

机构信息

Electrophysiology Section, Cardiovascular Division, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015 Apr;26(4):371-377. doi: 10.1111/jce.12603. Epub 2015 Jan 28.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary vein (PV) status, arrhythmia sources, and outcomes with ≥3 ablation procedures have not been characterized.

METHODS AND RESULTS

All patients with ≥3 procedures were included and underwent antral reisolation of reconnected PVs and ablation of non-PV triggers. Of 2,886 patients who underwent PVI, 181 (6%) had more than 2 ablation procedures (3 procedures in 146 and ≥4 procedures in 35). In 12 patients, the clinical arrhythmia was other than AF. Of the remaining 169 patients, 69 (41%) had 4 reconnected PVs, 27 (16%) had 3, 31 (18%) had 2, and 29 (17%) had 1. Only 13 (8%) had all PVs still isolated. Provocative techniques in 127 patients initiated PV triggers in 92 patients, including AF or PV atrial tachycardia in 64 (50%), and reproducible PV APDs in 28 (22%). Thirty-six (20%) had a new non-PV trigger targeted. At a mean of 36 months (12-119 months) after last procedure, 63 patients (47%) had no AF off antiarrhythmic drugs (AAD); 28 (21%) had no AF with AAD; and 18 (13%) had rare AF with good symptom control; 26 patients (19%) had recurrent AF.

CONCLUSIONS

At time of third or greater AF ablation, PV reconnection is the rule (92%) and PV triggers initiating AF can be demonstrated. Following repeat PVI and targeting non-PV triggers, 81% of patients had clinical AF control. Our findings suggest that PV reisolation and attempts to identify and eliminate non-PV triggers are effective and support the role of multiple repeat procedures for AF recurrence.

摘要

介绍

肺静脉(PV)状态、心律失常来源以及≥3次消融手术的结果尚未得到明确描述。

方法与结果

纳入所有接受≥3次手术的患者,并对重新连接的PV进行窦部再次隔离以及对非PV触发灶进行消融。在2886例行肺静脉隔离术(PVI)的患者中,181例(6%)接受了超过2次消融手术(146例接受3次手术,35例接受≥4次手术)。12例患者的临床心律失常并非房颤。在其余169例患者中,69例(41%)有4条重新连接的PV,27例(16%)有3条,31例(18%)有2条,29例(17%)有1条。仅有13例(8%)所有PV仍处于隔离状态。127例患者采用激发技术,92例患者诱发出PV触发灶,其中64例(50%)诱发房颤或PV房性心动过速,28例(22%)诱发出可重复的PV房性早搏。36例(20%)有新的非PV触发灶被靶向消融。在最后一次手术后平均36个月(12 - 119个月)时,63例患者(47%)停用抗心律失常药物(AAD)后无房颤发作;28例(21%)使用AAD时无房颤发作;18例(13%)有罕见房颤发作但症状控制良好;26例患者(19%)有房颤复发。结论:在第三次或更多次房颤消融时,PV重新连接是常见情况(92%),且可证实引发房颤的PV触发灶。在重复PVI并靶向非PV触发灶后

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验