Suppr超能文献

比较高收入、中等收入和低收入国家心脏康复的益处及参与情况的叙述性综述。

Narrative review comparing the benefits of and participation in cardiac rehabilitation in high-, middle- and low-income countries.

作者信息

Turk-Adawi Karam I, Grace Sherry L

机构信息

School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; College of Health Professions, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestinian Authority.

School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cardiovascular Rehabilitation & Prevention, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2015 May;24(5):510-20. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.11.013. Epub 2014 Nov 29.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity worldwide. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a comprehensive secondary prevention approach, with established benefits in reducing morbidity in high-income countries (HICs). The objectives of this review were to summarise what is known about the benefits of CR, including consideration of cost-effectiveness, in addition to rates of CR participation and adherence in high-, as well as low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

METHODS

A literature search of Medline, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Google Scholar was conducted for published articles from database inception to October 2013. The search was first directed to identify meta-analyses and reviews reporting on the benefits of CR. Then, the search was focussed to identify articles reporting CR participation and dropout rates. Full-text versions of relevant abstracts were summarised qualitatively.

RESULTS

Based on meta-analysis, CR significantly reduced all-cause mortality by 13%-26%, cardiac mortality by 20%-36%, myocardial re-infarction by 25%-47%, and risk factors. CR is cost-effective in HICs. In LMICs, CR is demonstrated to reduce risk factors, with no studies on mortality or cost-effectiveness. Based on available data, CR participation rates are <50% in the majority of countries, with documented dropout rates up to 56% and 82% in high- and middle-income countries, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CR is a beneficial intervention for heart patients in high and LMICs, but is underutilised with low participation and adherence rates worldwide. While more research is needed in LMICs, strategies shown to increase participation and program adherence should be implemented.

摘要

背景

心血管疾病是全球发病的主要原因。心脏康复(CR)是一种全面的二级预防方法,在高收入国家(HICs)降低发病率方面已证实具有益处。本综述的目的是总结关于CR益处的已知情况,包括成本效益,以及高收入国家和低收入及中等收入国家(LMICs)的CR参与率和依从率。

方法

对医学在线数据库(Medline)、医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)和谷歌学术进行文献检索,以查找从数据库建立至2013年10月发表的文章。检索首先旨在识别报告CR益处的荟萃分析和综述。然后,检索重点是识别报告CR参与率和退出率的文章。对相关摘要的全文版本进行定性总结。

结果

基于荟萃分析,CR显著降低全因死亡率13% - 26%、心脏死亡率20% - 36%、心肌再梗死率25% - 47%以及危险因素。CR在高收入国家具有成本效益。在低收入及中等收入国家,CR被证明可降低危险因素,但尚无关于死亡率或成本效益的研究。根据现有数据,大多数国家的CR参与率低于50%,高收入和中等收入国家记录的退出率分别高达56%和82%。

结论

CR对高收入国家和低收入及中等收入国家的心脏病患者是一种有益的干预措施,但在全球范围内利用不足,参与率和依从率较低。虽然低收入及中等收入国家需要更多研究,但应实施已证明可提高参与率和项目依从性的策略。

相似文献

3
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.
7
Cardiac rehabilitation costs.心脏康复治疗费用。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:322-328. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.030. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
8
Cardiac rehabilitation delivery in low/middle-income countries.中低收入国家的心脏康复服务提供。
Heart. 2019 Dec;105(23):1806-1812. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314486. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
9
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with stable angina.针对稳定型心绞痛成人患者的运动心脏康复治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 2;2(2):CD012786. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012786.pub2.

引用本文的文献

5

本文引用的文献

1
Smartphone-based cardiac rehabilitation.基于智能手机的心脏康复
Heart. 2014 Nov;100(22):1737-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306335. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
2
Global availability of cardiac rehabilitation.心脏康复在全球的可及性。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014 Oct;11(10):586-96. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.98. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
4
Promoting patient uptake and adherence in cardiac rehabilitation.促进患者接受心脏康复治疗并坚持治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 25(6):CD007131. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007131.pub3.
7
Alternative models of cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review.心脏康复的替代模式:系统评价。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Jan;22(1):35-74. doi: 10.1177/2047487313501093. Epub 2013 Aug 13.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验