• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Narrative review comparing the benefits of and participation in cardiac rehabilitation in high-, middle- and low-income countries.比较高收入、中等收入和低收入国家心脏康复的益处及参与情况的叙述性综述。
Heart Lung Circ. 2015 May;24(5):510-20. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.11.013. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
2
Cardiac rehabilitation in low- and middle-income countries: a review on cost and cost-effectiveness.低收入和中等收入国家的心脏康复:成本与成本效益综述
Int Health. 2016 Mar;8(2):77-82. doi: 10.1093/inthealth/ihv047. Epub 2015 Jul 24.
3
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease.基于运动的冠心病心脏康复。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Nov 6;11(11):CD001800. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001800.pub4.
4
Effects of cardiac rehabilitation in low-and middle-income countries: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.中低收入国家心脏康复的效果:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2022 Jan-Feb;70:119-174. doi: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Jul 13.
5
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
6
Overview of Cardiac Rehabilitation following post-acute myocardial infarction in European Society of Cardiology member countries.欧洲心脏病学会成员国中急性心肌梗死后心脏康复概述。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2023 Jul 12;30(9):758-768. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwad024.
7
Cardiac rehabilitation costs.心脏康复治疗费用。
Int J Cardiol. 2017 Oct 1;244:322-328. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.06.030. Epub 2017 Jun 10.
8
Cardiac rehabilitation delivery in low/middle-income countries.中低收入国家的心脏康复服务提供。
Heart. 2019 Dec;105(23):1806-1812. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2018-314486. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
9
Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for adults with stable angina.针对稳定型心绞痛成人患者的运动心脏康复治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Feb 2;2(2):CD012786. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012786.pub2.
10
Barriers for Nonparticipation and Dropout of Women in Cardiac Rehabilitation Programs: A Systematic Review.心脏康复项目中女性不参与和退出的障碍:一项系统综述
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 Aug;26(8):849-859. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2016.6249. Epub 2017 Apr 7.

引用本文的文献

1
A common-sense model-based nursing intervention improves exercise compliance in coronary heart disease: a randomized controlled trial and a pilot study.基于常识模型的护理干预可提高冠心病患者的运动依从性:一项随机对照试验和一项试点研究。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2025 Aug 8;12:1579015. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1579015. eCollection 2025.
2
Wearable Devices in Remote Cardiac Rehabilitation With and Without Weekly Online Coaching for Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Controlled Trial.针对冠心病患者,有或无每周在线辅导的远程心脏康复中的可穿戴设备:随机对照试验
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2025 May 12;13:e63797. doi: 10.2196/63797.
3
Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of cardiac rehabilitation and barriers to referral among cardiologists in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional survey.沙特阿拉伯心脏病专家对心脏康复的认知、态度和实践以及转诊障碍:一项横断面调查。
PLoS One. 2025 May 16;20(5):e0323694. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323694. eCollection 2025.
4
Barriers and Facilitators of Cardiac Rehabilitation in a Middle-Income Country: A Qualitative Study from China.中等收入国家心脏康复的障碍与促进因素:来自中国的一项定性研究
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Apr 6;22(4):574. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22040574.
5
Dose Response of Incidental Physical Activity Against Cardiovascular Events and Mortality.偶然身体活动对心血管事件和死亡率的剂量反应
Circulation. 2025 Apr 15;151(15):1063-1075. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072253. Epub 2025 Apr 14.
6
Identification of personal factors that influence engagement in cardiac rehabilitation and interventions targeting personal factors: A scoping review protocol.识别影响心脏康复参与度的个人因素以及针对个人因素的干预措施:一项范围综述方案
PLoS One. 2025 Jan 31;20(1):e0318265. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318265. eCollection 2025.
7
Perspectives of Policymakers on Barriers to and Enablers of the Uptake of Cardiac Rehabilitation in Saudi Arabia: A Qualitative Study.沙特阿拉伯政策制定者对心脏康复实施障碍与促进因素的看法:一项定性研究
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024 Dec 3;36(4):371-380. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1405. eCollection 2024.
8
Reducing dropout rates in cardiac rehabilitation among cardiac patients in a vulnerable situation: systematic development and feasibility testing of the Heart Priority Programme.降低弱势心脏病人心脏康复的退出率:心脏优先计划的系统开发与可行性测试
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1579. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-12073-x.
9
Comparative effectiveness of different interventions on adherence to exercise-based CR among patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后患者不同干预措施对基于运动的心脏康复依从性的比较效果:随机对照试验的网状Meta分析
BMC Nurs. 2024 Dec 18;23(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02561-0.
10
Barriers to Cardiac Rehabilitation Enrollment and Secondary Prevention Adherence in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Cross-sectional Survey.经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后冠心病患者心脏康复登记及二级预防依从性的障碍:一项横断面调查
J Saudi Heart Assoc. 2024 Sep 30;36(3):252-262. doi: 10.37616/2212-5043.1392. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
Smartphone-based cardiac rehabilitation.基于智能手机的心脏康复
Heart. 2014 Nov;100(22):1737-8. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-306335. Epub 2014 Aug 27.
2
Global availability of cardiac rehabilitation.心脏康复在全球的可及性。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2014 Oct;11(10):586-96. doi: 10.1038/nrcardio.2014.98. Epub 2014 Jul 15.
3
Smartphone-based home care model improved use of cardiac rehabilitation in postmyocardial infarction patients: results from a randomised controlled trial.基于智能手机的家庭护理模式改善了心肌梗死后患者心脏康复的利用率:一项随机对照试验的结果
Heart. 2014 Nov;100(22):1770-9. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2014-305783. Epub 2014 Jun 27.
4
Promoting patient uptake and adherence in cardiac rehabilitation.促进患者接受心脏康复治疗并坚持治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jun 25(6):CD007131. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007131.pub3.
5
Using mobile technology for cardiac rehabilitation: a review and framework for development and evaluation.利用移动技术进行心脏康复:一项综述及开发与评估框架
J Am Heart Assoc. 2013 Nov 1;2(6):e000568. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.113.000568.
6
Physical activity in patients with stable coronary heart disease: an international perspective.稳定型冠心病患者的体力活动:国际视角。
Eur Heart J. 2013 Nov;34(42):3286-93. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht258. Epub 2013 Sep 6.
7
Alternative models of cardiac rehabilitation: a systematic review.心脏康复的替代模式:系统评价。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Jan;22(1):35-74. doi: 10.1177/2047487313501093. Epub 2013 Aug 13.
8
The effect of home-based cardiac rehabilitation program on self efficacy of patients referred to cardiac rehabilitation center.居家心脏康复计划对转至心脏康复中心患者自我效能的影响。
BMC Res Notes. 2013 Jul 23;6:287. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-287.
9
Cardiac rehabilitation services in low- and middle-income countries: a scoping review.低收入和中等收入国家的心脏康复服务:一项范围综述。
J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2014 Sep-Oct;29(5):454-63. doi: 10.1097/JCN.0b013e31829c1414.
10
Effect of continuous care model on lifestyle of patients with myocardial infarction.延续性护理模式对心肌梗死患者生活方式的影响。
ARYA Atheroscler. 2013 May;9(3):186-91.

比较高收入、中等收入和低收入国家心脏康复的益处及参与情况的叙述性综述。

Narrative review comparing the benefits of and participation in cardiac rehabilitation in high-, middle- and low-income countries.

作者信息

Turk-Adawi Karam I, Grace Sherry L

机构信息

School of Health Policy and Management, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; College of Health Professions, Al-Quds University, Jerusalem, Palestinian Authority.

School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Cardiovascular Rehabilitation & Prevention, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Heart Lung Circ. 2015 May;24(5):510-20. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2014.11.013. Epub 2014 Nov 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.hlc.2014.11.013
PMID:25534902
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4527841/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease is a leading cause of morbidity worldwide. Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is a comprehensive secondary prevention approach, with established benefits in reducing morbidity in high-income countries (HICs). The objectives of this review were to summarise what is known about the benefits of CR, including consideration of cost-effectiveness, in addition to rates of CR participation and adherence in high-, as well as low- and middle-income countries (LMICs).

METHODS

A literature search of Medline, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), and Google Scholar was conducted for published articles from database inception to October 2013. The search was first directed to identify meta-analyses and reviews reporting on the benefits of CR. Then, the search was focussed to identify articles reporting CR participation and dropout rates. Full-text versions of relevant abstracts were summarised qualitatively.

RESULTS

Based on meta-analysis, CR significantly reduced all-cause mortality by 13%-26%, cardiac mortality by 20%-36%, myocardial re-infarction by 25%-47%, and risk factors. CR is cost-effective in HICs. In LMICs, CR is demonstrated to reduce risk factors, with no studies on mortality or cost-effectiveness. Based on available data, CR participation rates are <50% in the majority of countries, with documented dropout rates up to 56% and 82% in high- and middle-income countries, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

CR is a beneficial intervention for heart patients in high and LMICs, but is underutilised with low participation and adherence rates worldwide. While more research is needed in LMICs, strategies shown to increase participation and program adherence should be implemented.

摘要

背景

心血管疾病是全球发病的主要原因。心脏康复(CR)是一种全面的二级预防方法,在高收入国家(HICs)降低发病率方面已证实具有益处。本综述的目的是总结关于CR益处的已知情况,包括成本效益,以及高收入国家和低收入及中等收入国家(LMICs)的CR参与率和依从率。

方法

对医学在线数据库(Medline)、医学文摘数据库(EMBASE)和谷歌学术进行文献检索,以查找从数据库建立至2013年10月发表的文章。检索首先旨在识别报告CR益处的荟萃分析和综述。然后,检索重点是识别报告CR参与率和退出率的文章。对相关摘要的全文版本进行定性总结。

结果

基于荟萃分析,CR显著降低全因死亡率13% - 26%、心脏死亡率20% - 36%、心肌再梗死率25% - 47%以及危险因素。CR在高收入国家具有成本效益。在低收入及中等收入国家,CR被证明可降低危险因素,但尚无关于死亡率或成本效益的研究。根据现有数据,大多数国家的CR参与率低于50%,高收入和中等收入国家记录的退出率分别高达56%和82%。

结论

CR对高收入国家和低收入及中等收入国家的心脏病患者是一种有益的干预措施,但在全球范围内利用不足,参与率和依从率较低。虽然低收入及中等收入国家需要更多研究,但应实施已证明可提高参与率和项目依从性的策略。