Maynard Greg, Kulasa Kristen, Ramos Pedro, Childers Diana, Clay Brian, Sebasky Meghan, Fink Ed, Field Aaron, Renvall Marian, Juang Patricia S, Choe Charles, Pearson Diane, Serences Brittany, Lohnes Suzanne
Endocr Pract. 2015 Apr;21(4):355-67. doi: 10.4158/EP14367.OR. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
Uncontrolled hyperglycemia and iatrogenic hypoglycemia represent common and frequently preventable quality and safety issues. We sought to demonstrate the effectiveness of a hypoglycemia reduction bundle, proactive surveillance of glycemic outliers, and an interdisciplinary data-driven approach to glycemic management.
all hospitalized adult non-intensive care unit (non-ICU) patients with hyperglycemia and/or a diagnosis of diabetes admitted to our 550-bed academic center across 5 calendar years (CYs).
hypoglycemia reduction bundle targeting most common remediable contributors to iatrogenic hypoglycemia; clinical decision support in standardized order sets and glucose management pages; measure-vention (daily measurement of glycemic outliers with concurrent intervention by the inpatient diabetes team); educational programs.
Pearson chi-square value with relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare glycemic control, hypoglycemia, and hypoglycemia management parameters across the baseline time period (TP1, CY 2009-2010), transitional (TP2, CY 2011-2012), and mature postintervention phase (TP3, CY 2013). Hypoglycemia defined as blood glucose <70 mg/dL, severe hypoglycemia as <40 mg/dL, and severe hyperglycemia >299 mg/dL.
A total of 22,990 non-ICU patients, representing 94,900 patient-days of observation were included over the 5-year study. The RR TP3:TP1 for glycemic excursions was reduced significantly: hypoglycemic stay, 0.71 (95% CI, 0.65 to 0.79); severe hypoglycemic stay, 0.44 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.58); recurrent hypoglycemic day during stay, 0.78 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.94); severe hypoglycemic day, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.37 to 0.62); severe hyperglycemic day (>299 mg/dL), 0.76 (95% CI, 0.73 to 0.80).
Hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia event rates were both improved, with the most marked effect on severe hypoglycemic events. Most of these interventions should be portable to other hospitals.
血糖控制不佳和医源性低血糖是常见且往往可预防的质量与安全问题。我们试图证明降低低血糖综合措施、对血糖异常值进行主动监测以及采用跨学科数据驱动方法进行血糖管理的有效性。
在5个日历年(CY)期间入住我们拥有550张床位的学术中心的所有住院成年非重症监护病房(非ICU)高血糖和/或糖尿病患者。
针对医源性低血糖最常见可补救因素的降低低血糖综合措施;标准化医嘱集和血糖管理页面中的临床决策支持;测量 - 干预(对血糖异常值进行每日测量,同时由住院糖尿病团队进行干预);教育项目。
计算Pearson卡方值及相对风险(RRs)和95%置信区间(CIs),以比较基线时间段(TP1,2009 - 2010年CY)、过渡阶段(TP2,2011 - 2012年CY)和干预后成熟阶段(TP3,2013年CY)的血糖控制、低血糖及低血糖管理参数。低血糖定义为血糖<70 mg/dL,严重低血糖为<40 mg/dL,严重高血糖为>299 mg/dL。
在为期5年的研究中,共纳入22,990例非ICU患者,代表94,900个患者观察日。TP3与TP1相比,血糖波动的RRs显著降低:低血糖住院天数,0.71(95%CI,0.65至0.79);严重低血糖住院天数,0.44(95%CI,0.34至0.58);住院期间复发性低血糖日,0.78(95%CI,0.64至0.94);严重低血糖日,0.48(95%CI,0.37至0.62);严重高血糖日(>299 mg/dL),0.76(95%CI,0.73至0.80)。
高血糖和低血糖事件发生率均有所改善,对严重低血糖事件的影响最为显著。这些干预措施大多可应用于其他医院。