Suppr超能文献

IV期非小细胞肺癌中联合化疗与单药化疗后序贯联合化疗的比较:东部肿瘤协作组的一项研究

Combination chemotherapy versus single agents followed by combination chemotherapy in stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group.

作者信息

Bonomi P D, Finkelstein D M, Ruckdeschel J C, Blum R H, Green M D, Mason B, Hahn R, Tormey D C, Harris J, Comis R

机构信息

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1989 Nov;7(11):1602-13. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1989.7.11.1602.

Abstract

During the last decade, the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) has studied a series of combination chemotherapy regimens in metastatic (stage IV) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In January 1984, the ECOG activated a randomized study, EST 1583, which concluded the evaluation of combination regimens in phase III trials and initiated the evaluation of single agents exclusively in previously untreated patients. The treatment regimens in EST 1583 consisted of: (1) mitomycin, vinblastine, and cisplatin (MVP); (2) vinblastine and cisplatin (VP); (3) MVP alternating with the regimen cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, methotrexate, and procarbazine (CAMP); (4) carboplatin followed by the MVP regimen at the time of progression; and (5) iproplatin followed by MVP at the time of progression. From January 1984 to July 1985, 743 patients were entered on this trial and 699 fulfilled the eligibility requirements. The following objective response rates (complete plus partial remissions) were observed: first-line MVP, 20%; VP, 13%; MVP/CAMP, 13%; carboplatin, 9%; iproplatin, 6%; and second-line MVP, 6%. First-line MVP produced a significantly higher response rate than the other treatments (P = .03) adjusted for prognostic variables. Using analyses that were adjusted for prognostic covariates, survival for patients treated on a given regimen was compared with survival for all remaining patients. These analyses showed that treatment with carboplatin was associated with longer survival (median survival time, 31.7 weeks; P = .008) while initial treatment with MVP was associated with a trend for shorter survival (median survival time, 22.7 weeks; P = .09). It should be noted that none of these regimens appear to have produced a clinically meaningful prolongation of survival. Similar analyses evaluating time to progression disclosed that carboplatin-treated patients had a significantly longer time to progression (median time to progression, 29 weeks) than all remaining patients (P = .01). Life-threatening and lethal toxicities (toxicity grades 4 and 5) were greater on the combination regimens than on the single agents (P less than .0001). Based on these results, current group-wide ECOG trials in stage IV NSCLC consist of randomized phase II trials evaluating single agents.

摘要

在过去十年中,东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)对一系列联合化疗方案用于转移性(IV期)非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)进行了研究。1984年1月,ECOG启动了一项随机研究EST 1583,该研究结束了III期试验中联合方案的评估,并开始专门对先前未接受过治疗的患者进行单药评估。EST 1583中的治疗方案包括:(1)丝裂霉素、长春碱和顺铂(MVP);(2)长春碱和顺铂(VP);(3)MVP与环磷酰胺、阿霉素、甲氨蝶呤和丙卡巴肼方案(CAMP)交替使用;(4)卡铂,疾病进展时采用MVP方案;(5)异环磷铂,疾病进展时采用MVP方案。从1984年1月至1985年7月,743例患者进入该试验,699例符合入选标准。观察到以下客观缓解率(完全缓解加部分缓解):一线MVP为20%;VP为13%;MVP/CAMP为13%;卡铂为9%;异环磷铂为6%;二线MVP为6%。经预后变量调整后,一线MVP的缓解率显著高于其他治疗方案(P = 0.03)。使用经预后协变量调整的分析方法,将接受特定方案治疗的患者生存率与所有其余患者的生存率进行比较。这些分析表明,卡铂治疗与较长生存期相关(中位生存期31.7周;P = 0.008),而初始使用MVP治疗有生存期较短的趋势(中位生存期22.7周;P = 0.09)。应当指出,这些方案似乎均未产生具有临床意义的生存期延长。评估疾病进展时间的类似分析表明,接受卡铂治疗的患者疾病进展时间显著长于所有其余患者(中位疾病进展时间29周)(P = 0.01)。联合方案的危及生命和致死性毒性(4级和5级毒性)高于单药治疗(P<0.0001)。基于这些结果,目前ECOG在IV期NSCLC开展的全组试验包括评估单药的随机II期试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验