German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Department of Internal Medicine 1, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
Cantonal Hospital of St Gallen, St Gallen, Switzerland and SAKK Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland.
Lancet. 2015 Apr 11;385(9976):1418-27. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)61469-0. Epub 2014 Dec 22.
The role of bleomycin and dacarbazine in the ABVD regimen (ie, doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) has been questioned, especially for treatment of early-stage favourable Hodgkin's lymphoma, because of the drugs' toxicity. We aimed to investigate whether omission of either bleomycin or dacarbazine, or both, from ABVD reduced the efficacy of this regimen in treatment of Hodgkin's lymphoma.
In this open-label, randomised, multicentre trial (HD13) we compared two cycles of ABVD with two cycles of the reduced-intensity regimen variants ABV (doxorubicin, bleomycin, and vinblastine), AVD (doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine), and AV (doxorubicin and vinblastine), in patients with newly diagnosed, histologically proven, classic or nodular, lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin's lymphoma. In each treatment group, 30 Gy involved-field radiotherapy (IFRT) was given after both cycles of chemotherapy were completed. From Jan 28, 2003, patients were centrally randomly assigned (1:1:1:1) with a minimisation method to the four groups. Because of high event rates, assignment to the AV and ABV groups stopped early, on Sept 30, 2005, and Feb 10, 2006; assignment to ABVD and AVD continued (1:1) until Sept 30, 2009. Our primary objective was to show non-inferiority of the experimental variants compared with ABVD in terms of freedom from treatment failure (FFTF), by excluding a difference of 6% after 5 years corresponding to a hazard ratio (HR) of 1.72, via a 95% CI. Analyses reported here include qualified patients only, and between-group comparisons include only patients recruited during the same period. The trial was registered, number ISRCTN63474366.
Of 1502 qualified patients, 566, 198, 571, and 167 were randomly assigned to receive ABVD, ABV, AVD, or AV, respectively. 5 year FFTF was 93.1%, 81.4%, 89.2%, and 77.1% with ABVD, ABV, AVD, and AV, respectively. Compared with ABVD, inferiority of the dacarbazine-deleted variants was detected with 5 year differences of -11.5% (95% CI -18.3 to -4.7; HR 2.06 [1.21 to 3.52]) for ABV and -15.2% (-23.0 to -7.4; HR 2.57 [1.51 to 4.40]) for AV. Non-inferiority of AVD compared with ABVD could also not be detected (5 year difference -3.9%, -7.7 to -0·1; HR 1.50, 1.00 to 2.26). 178 (33%) of 544 patients given ABVD had WHO grade III or IV toxicity, compared with 53 (28%) of 187 given ABV, 142 (26%) of 539 given AVD, and 40 (26%) of 151 given AV. Leucopenia was the most common event, and highest in the groups given bleomycin.
Dacarbazine cannot be omitted from ABVD without a substantial loss of efficacy. With respect to our predefined non-inferiority margin, bleomycin cannot be safely omitted either, and the standard of care for patients with early-stage favourable Hodgkin's lymphoma should remain ABVD followed by IFRT.
Deutsche Krebshilfe and Swiss State Secretariat for Education and Research.
博来霉素和达卡巴嗪在 ABVD 方案(即多柔比星、博来霉素、长春碱和达卡巴嗪)中的作用受到质疑,尤其是对于早期预后良好的霍奇金淋巴瘤的治疗,因为这些药物的毒性。我们旨在研究从 ABVD 方案中删除博来霉素或达卡巴嗪,或者两者都删除是否会降低该方案治疗霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效。
在这项开放标签、随机、多中心试验(HD13)中,我们比较了两个周期的 ABVD 方案与两种强度降低的方案,ABV(多柔比星、博来霉素和长春碱)、AVD(多柔比星、长春碱和达卡巴嗪)和 AV(多柔比星和长春碱),用于新诊断的组织学证实的经典或结节性、淋巴细胞为主型霍奇金淋巴瘤患者。在每个治疗组中,在完成两个周期的化疗后给予 30 Gy 累及野放疗(IFRT)。从 2003 年 1 月 28 日开始,患者通过最小化方法以 1:1:1:1 的比例随机分配到四个组。由于高事件率,AV 和 ABV 组在 2005 年 9 月 30 日和 2006 年 2 月 10 日提前停止了分配,而 ABVD 和 AVD 组则继续(1:1),直到 2009 年 9 月 30 日。我们的主要目的是证明与 ABVD 相比,实验性方案在无治疗失败(FFTF)方面不劣效性,排除 5 年后 6%的差异,相当于危险比(HR)为 1.72,通过 95%CI。这里报告的分析仅包括合格患者,组间比较仅包括同期招募的患者。该试验已注册,编号为 ISRCTN63474366。
在 1502 名合格患者中,566、198、571 和 167 名患者分别随机分配接受 ABVD、ABV、AVD 或 AV 治疗。5 年 FFTF 分别为 93.1%、81.4%、89.2%和 77.1%,ABVD、ABV、AVD 和 AV 组分别为 93.1%、81.4%、89.2%和 77.1%。与 ABVD 相比,达卡巴嗪缺失变体的劣势被检测到,5 年差异为-11.5%(95%CI-18.3 至-4.7;HR 2.06[1.21 至 3.52]),AV 为-15.2%(95%CI-23.0 至-7.4;HR 2.57[1.51 至 4.40])。也不能检测到 AVD 与 ABVD 相比的非劣效性(5 年差异-3.9%,-7.7 至-0.1;HR 1.50,1.00 至 2.26)。与 187 名接受 ABV 治疗的患者相比,544 名接受 ABVD 治疗的患者中有 178 名(33%)出现世界卫生组织(WHO)三级或四级毒性,53 名(28%)接受 ABV 治疗,142 名(26%)接受 AVD 治疗,151 名(26%)接受 AV 治疗。白细胞减少是最常见的事件,接受博来霉素治疗的患者中发生率最高。
如果不显著降低疗效,博来霉素和达卡巴嗪不能从 ABVD 中删除。根据我们预先设定的非劣效性边界,博来霉素也不能安全地删除,早期预后良好的霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的标准治疗方法仍然是 ABVD 联合 IFRT。
德国癌症援助组织和瑞士联邦教育、研究与创新署。