• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Analgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential current on experimental ischemic pain models: frequencies of 50 hz and 100 hz.经皮电刺激神经疗法和干扰电流对实验性缺血性疼痛模型的镇痛效果:50赫兹和100赫兹频率
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Dec;26(12):1945-8. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1945. Epub 2014 Dec 25.
2
An investigation into the analgesic effects of interferential currents and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on experimentally induced ischemic pain in otherwise pain-free volunteers.对干扰电流和经皮电刺激神经疗法对原本无痛志愿者实验性诱导缺血性疼痛的镇痛效果的研究。
Phys Ther. 2003 Mar;83(3):208-23.
3
A single-blind placebo-controlled investigation into the analgesic effects of interferential currents on experimentally induced ischaemic pain in healthy subjects.一项针对干扰电流对健康受试者实验性诱导缺血性疼痛镇痛效果的单盲安慰剂对照研究。
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2002 May;22(3):187-96. doi: 10.1046/j.1475-097x.2002.00416.x.
4
Analgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential currents on heat pain in healthy subjects.经皮电刺激神经疗法和干扰电流对健康受试者热痛的镇痛作用。
J Rehabil Med. 2003 Jan;35(1):15-9. doi: 10.1080/16501970306101.
5
A single-blind investigation into the hypoalgesic effects of different swing patterns of interferential currents on cold-induced pain in healthy volunteers.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Mar;84(3):350-7. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50005.
6
Immediate analgesic effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential current (IFC) on chronic low back pain: Randomised placebo-controlled trial.经皮神经电刺激(TENS)和干扰电流(IFC)治疗慢性腰痛的即刻镇痛效果:随机安慰剂对照试验。
J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2021 Jul;27:181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 18.
7
Upper trapezius relaxation induced by TENS and interferential current in computer users with chronic nonspecific neck discomfort: An electromyographic analysis.经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)和干扰电流对患有慢性非特异性颈部不适的电脑使用者上斜方肌放松的影响:一项肌电图分析
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2015;28(1):19-24. doi: 10.3233/BMR-140482.
8
A comparative study of transcutaneous interferential electrical stimulation and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on children with primary nocturnal enuresis: a randomized clinical trial.经皮干扰电刺激与经皮神经电刺激治疗儿童原发性夜间遗尿症的对比研究:一项随机临床试验。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2020 Mar;52(3):409-415. doi: 10.1007/s11255-019-02340-w. Epub 2019 Nov 22.
9
Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential currents (IFC) in patients with nonspecific chronic low back pain: randomized clinical trial.经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)和干扰电流(IFC)对非特异性慢性下腰痛患者的影响:随机临床试验。
Sao Paulo Med J. 2011;129(4):206-16. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802011000400003.
10
[Comparison of the analgesic effect of interferential current (IFC) and TENS in patients with low back pain].[干扰电流(IFC)与经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)对腰痛患者镇痛效果的比较]
Wiad Lek. 2015;68(1):13-9.

引用本文的文献

1
An Open-Label Comparative Study of the Impact of Two Types of Electrical Stimulation (Direct Current Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation and Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation) on Physical Therapy Treatment of Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy.两种电刺激(直流电神经肌肉电刺激和经皮电刺激)对糖尿病周围神经病变物理治疗影响的开放标签对照研究
J Diabetes Res. 2025 Feb 4;2025:9970124. doi: 10.1155/jdr/9970124. eCollection 2025.
2
Does High Frequency Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) Affect EEG Gamma Band Activity?高频经皮电神经刺激(TENS)会影响脑电图伽马波段活动吗?
J Biomed Phys Eng. 2018 Sep 1;8(3):271-280. eCollection 2018 Sep.
3
Effect of low frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation of TE5 (waiguan) and PC6 (neiguan) acupoints on cold-induced pain.低频经皮电刺激手少阳三焦经TE5(外关)和手厥阴心包经PC6(内关)穴位对冷诱导疼痛的影响。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Jan;28(1):76-81. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.76. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
4
Comparison of skin sensory thresholds using pre-programmed or single-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.使用预编程或单频经皮电神经刺激比较皮肤感觉阈值。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Dec;27(12):3811-2. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.3811. Epub 2015 Dec 28.
5
Effects of two different intensities of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on pain thresholds of contralateral muscles in healthy subjects.两种不同强度的经皮电神经刺激对健康受试者对侧肌肉疼痛阈值的影响。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Sep;27(9):2771-4. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.2771. Epub 2015 Sep 30.

本文引用的文献

1
Electrocortical Analysis of Patients with Intercostobrachial Pain Treated with TENS after Breast Cancer Surgery.乳腺癌手术后经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)治疗肋间臂神经痛患者的皮层电分析
J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Mar;26(3):349-53. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.349. Epub 2014 Mar 25.
2
Psychophysical responses to experimentally induced heat and cold pain before, during, and after transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation.经皮神经电刺激治疗前后实验性诱导的热痛和冷痛的心理物理学反应。
Neuromodulation. 2003 Oct;6(4):229-36. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1403.2003.03030.x.
3
Differential frequency effects of strong nonpainful transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on experimentally induced ischemic pain in healthy human participants.强无痛经皮电神经刺激对健康人体实验性缺血性疼痛的频差效应。
Clin J Pain. 2011 Jun;27(5):434-41. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318208c926.
4
Effectiveness of interferential current therapy in the management of musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.干扰电疗法治疗肌肉骨骼疼痛的效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Phys Ther. 2010 Sep;90(9):1219-38. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20090335. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
5
Electrotherapy: yesterday, today and tomorrow.电疗法:昨天、今天和明天。
Haemophilia. 2010 Jul;16 Suppl 5:126-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2516.2010.02310.x.
6
A comparison of the analgesic efficacy of medium-frequency alternating current and TENS.中频率交流电流与经皮神经电刺激镇痛效果的比较。
Physiotherapy. 2009 Dec;95(4):280-8. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2009.06.005. Epub 2009 Sep 2.
7
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for acute pain.经皮电刺激神经疗法治疗急性疼痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD006142. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006142.pub2.
8
Effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for treatment of hyperalgesia and pain.经皮电刺激神经疗法治疗痛觉过敏和疼痛的有效性。
Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2008 Dec;10(6):492-9. doi: 10.1007/s11926-008-0080-z.
9
A single-blind investigation into the hypoalgesic effects of different swing patterns of interferential currents on cold-induced pain in healthy volunteers.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 Mar;84(3):350-7. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2003.50005.
10
An investigation into the analgesic effects of interferential currents and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on experimentally induced ischemic pain in otherwise pain-free volunteers.对干扰电流和经皮电刺激神经疗法对原本无痛志愿者实验性诱导缺血性疼痛的镇痛效果的研究。
Phys Ther. 2003 Mar;83(3):208-23.

经皮电刺激神经疗法和干扰电流对实验性缺血性疼痛模型的镇痛效果:50赫兹和100赫兹频率

Analgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential current on experimental ischemic pain models: frequencies of 50 hz and 100 hz.

作者信息

Bae Young-Hyeon, Lee Suk Min

机构信息

Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Republic of Korea ; Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Department of Nursing and Rehabilitation Science, Angelo State University, USA.

Department of Physical Therapy, Sahmyook University, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Phys Ther Sci. 2014 Dec;26(12):1945-8. doi: 10.1589/jpts.26.1945. Epub 2014 Dec 25.

DOI:10.1589/jpts.26.1945
PMID:25540504
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4273064/
Abstract

[Purpose] This study compared the analgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) and interferential currents (IFC) on induced ischemic pain in healthy volunteers. [Subjects] The subjects were 36 volunteers (18 male, 18 female) without known pathology that could cause pain. Their mean age was 24.5±2.2 years. [Methods] A single-blind and parallel-group method was used. Subjects were randomly allocated to receive each 50 Hz TENS, 50 Hz IFC, 100 Hz TENS, and 100 Hz IFC. This study experimentally induced ischemic pain in otherwise pain-free subjects using a modified version of the submaximal effort tourniquet technique. Subjects completed twelve cycles of the ischemic-induced pain test. The primary outcome measure was the change in self-reported of pain intensity during one of four possible treatments. [Results] There were significant effects for Time, which were attributed to a significant reduction in pain intensity for all groups. There were no significant effects for groups or group-time interaction. The 50 Hz IFC treatment was more comfortable than the other treatments in the present study, and it is likely to be better accepted and tolerated by patients. [Conclusion] We conclude that there were no differences in the analgesic effects of the four treatments under the present experimental conditions. The 50 Hz IFC treatment is more comfortable than the other treatments.

摘要

[目的] 本研究比较了经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)和干扰电流(IFC)对健康志愿者诱发的缺血性疼痛的镇痛效果。[对象] 对象为36名无已知可致痛病理状况的志愿者(18名男性,18名女性)。他们的平均年龄为24.5±2.2岁。[方法] 采用单盲平行组方法。受试者被随机分配接受50Hz TENS、50Hz IFC、100Hz TENS和100Hz IFC。本研究使用改良的次最大用力止血带技术在原本无痛的受试者中实验性诱发缺血性疼痛。受试者完成了12个周期的缺血性疼痛测试。主要结局指标是在四种可能治疗之一期间自我报告的疼痛强度变化。[结果] 时间有显著影响,这归因于所有组的疼痛强度显著降低。组间或组 - 时间交互作用无显著影响。在本研究中,50Hz IFC治疗比其他治疗更舒适,并且可能更容易被患者接受和耐受。[结论] 我们得出结论,在当前实验条件下,四种治疗的镇痛效果无差异。50Hz IFC治疗比其他治疗更舒适。