• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
A comparison between monocanalicular and pushed monocanalicular silicone intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.单泪小管与推注式单泪小管硅胶插管治疗先天性鼻泪管阻塞的比较。
Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec 18;7(6):1039-42. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.06.24. eCollection 2014.
2
Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.先天性鼻泪管阻塞的单泪小管与双泪小管硅胶插管术
J AAPOS. 2010 Oct;14(5):421-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.08.003.
3
[Congenital nasolacrymal duct obstruction: pulled monocanalicular intubation (Monoka) versus pushed monocanalicular intubation (Masterka)].先天性鼻泪管阻塞:牵拉单泪管插管(莫诺卡管)与推注单泪管插管(马斯特卡管)的比较
J Fr Ophtalmol. 2020 Jun;43(6):461-466. doi: 10.1016/j.jfo.2019.10.016. Epub 2020 Apr 29.
4
Silicone intubation for nasolacrimal duct stenosis in adults: monocanalicular or bicanalicular intubation.成人鼻泪管狭窄的硅胶插管治疗:单泪小管或双泪小管插管
J Craniofac Surg. 2014 May;25(3):1009-11. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000000708.
5
Clinical Effectiveness of Monocanalicular Silicone Intubation for Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Under Nasal Endoscopic Visualization of the Terminal End of the Obstructed Nasolacrimal Duct.鼻内镜直视下阻塞性鼻泪管末端单管硅胶插管术治疗先天性鼻泪管阻塞的临床疗效
J Craniofac Surg. 2015 Jun;26(4):1328-31. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000001713.
6
Clinical effectiveness of monocanalicular and bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.单泪小管和双泪小管硅胶插管治疗先天性鼻泪管阻塞的临床疗效
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Jul;23(4):1010-4. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824dfc8a.
7
Outcome of monocanalicular intubation for complex congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: the role of age.单鼻内管插管治疗复杂先天性鼻泪管阻塞的结果:年龄的作用。
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2022 Jan-Mar;66(1):49-54. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2022.11.
8
Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing for the treatment of simple and incomplete complex types of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in children older than 18 months old.18个月以上儿童单纯性及不完全性复杂性先天性鼻泪管阻塞治疗中推注式单泪小管插管与探通术的比较
Orbit. 2017 Aug;36(4):218-222. doi: 10.1080/01676830.2017.1337162. Epub 2017 Jun 19.
9
Pushed monocanalicular intubation versus probing as a primary management for congenital nasolacrimal obstruction.先天性鼻泪管阻塞的初始治疗:单泪小管插管推注法与探通术的比较
Clin Ophthalmol. 2016 Sep 7;10:1487-93. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S101713. eCollection 2016.
10
Early loss of monocanalicular silicone tubes in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction: incidence, predictors, and effect on outcome.先天性鼻泪管阻塞中单泪小管硅胶管的早期脱落:发生率、预测因素及其对预后的影响
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2015 Mar;79(3):301-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.09.027. Epub 2014 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Probing and nasolacrimal intubation outcomes in children over 18 Months of age with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.18个月以上先天性鼻泪管阻塞患儿的探通及鼻泪管插管治疗效果
Heliyon. 2024 Aug 13;10(16):e36245. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36245. eCollection 2024 Aug 30.
2
Pulled versus Pushed Monocanalicular Silicone Intubation in Adults with Lacrimal Drainage System Stenosis: A Comparative Case Series.成人泪道系统狭窄患者单泪小管硅胶插管的牵拉式与推送式比较:一项病例对照系列研究
J Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 1;2021:5592039. doi: 10.1155/2021/5592039. eCollection 2021.
3
The Use of Stents in Children with Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Requiring Surgical Intervention: A Systematic Review.支架在需要手术干预的儿童鼻泪管阻塞中的应用:系统评价。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Feb 7;17(3):1067. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17031067.
4
Insights in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.先天性鼻泪管阻塞的治疗见解
Rom J Ophthalmol. 2017 Apr-Jun;61(2):101-106. doi: 10.22336/rjo.2017.19.
5
Comparative Study of Recessive Spherical Headed Silicone Intubation and Endonasal Dacryocystorhinostomy under Nasal Endoscopy for Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction.隐性球头硅胶管植入术与鼻内窥镜下鼻腔泪囊吻合术治疗鼻泪管阻塞的对比研究。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 10;7(1):7734. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-07293-7.
6
[Minimally invasive diagnostics and therapy of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction].先天性鼻泪管阻塞的微创诊断与治疗
Ophthalmologe. 2017 May;114(5):397-408. doi: 10.1007/s00347-017-0472-4.
7
Bicanalicular versus monocanalicular intubation after failed probing in congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.先天性鼻泪管阻塞探通失败后双泪小管插管与单泪小管插管的比较
Int J Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct 18;9(10):1466-1470. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2016.10.16. eCollection 2016.

本文引用的文献

1
Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in premature children.早产儿先天性鼻泪管阻塞
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2013 Jul-Aug;50(4):239-44. doi: 10.3928/01913913-20130423-01. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
2
Effect of timing of silicone tube removal on the result of duct intubation in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.先天性鼻泪管阻塞患儿行硅胶管拔除时机对泪道插管效果的影响。
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Jan-Feb;29(1):48-50. doi: 10.1097/IOP.0b013e318275b634.
3
Effectiveness of primary monocanalicularnasal intubation with Monoka tubes and nasal endoscopic findings for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with enlarged lacrimal sac and chronic dacryocystitis.使用莫诺卡管进行原发性单泪小管鼻腔插管治疗伴有泪囊增大的先天性鼻泪管阻塞和慢性泪囊炎的有效性及鼻内镜检查结果
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Nov;23(6):1638-41. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31825dad6c.
4
Pushed monocanalicular intubation: an alternative stenting system for the management of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstructions.推注式单泪小管插管:一种用于治疗先天性鼻泪管阻塞的替代支架系统。
J AAPOS. 2012 Oct;16(5):468-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2012.07.003.
5
Resolution of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction with nonsurgical management.先天性鼻泪管阻塞的非手术治疗效果
Arch Ophthalmol. 2012 Jun;130(6):730-4. doi: 10.1001/archophthalmol.2012.454.
6
Clinical effectiveness of monocanalicular and bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.单泪小管和双泪小管硅胶插管治疗先天性鼻泪管阻塞的临床疗效
J Craniofac Surg. 2012 Jul;23(4):1010-4. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e31824dfc8a.
7
Evaluation of treatment modalities and prognostic factors in children with congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.先天性鼻泪管阻塞患儿治疗方式及预后因素的评估
J AAPOS. 2012 Feb;16(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.07.020.
8
Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.单通道与双通道插管治疗先天性鼻泪管阻塞。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2011 Nov;249(11):1729-33. doi: 10.1007/s00417-011-1700-2. Epub 2011 Jun 17.
9
Congenital dacryocystocele: is there a familial predisposition?先天性泪囊膨出症:是否存在家族易感性?
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2011 Mar;75(3):430-2. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2010.11.026. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
10
Monocanalicular versus bicanalicular silicone intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.先天性鼻泪管阻塞的单泪小管与双泪小管硅胶插管术
J AAPOS. 2010 Oct;14(5):421-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2010.08.003.

单泪小管与推注式单泪小管硅胶插管治疗先天性鼻泪管阻塞的比较。

A comparison between monocanalicular and pushed monocanalicular silicone intubation in the treatment of congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

作者信息

Andalib Dima, Mansoori Hossein

机构信息

Strabismus and Oculoplastic Unit, Nikookari Eye Hospital, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Abbasi St, Tabriz 5154645395, Iran.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2014 Dec 18;7(6):1039-42. doi: 10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.06.24. eCollection 2014.

DOI:10.3980/j.issn.2222-3959.2014.06.24
PMID:25540762
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4270973/
Abstract

AIM

To compare the success rate of monocanalicular versus pushed monocanalicular silicone intubation (PMCI) of the nasolacrimal duct for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO).

METHODS

In a prospective randomized clinical trial 53 eyes of 49 patients with CNLDO underwent either monocanalicular silicone intubation (MCI) (n=28 eyes) or PMCI (n=25 eyes). All procedures were performed by 1 oculoplastic surgeon. Treatment success was defined as the complete resolution of epiphora at 3mo after tube removal.

RESULTS

The surgical outcome was assessed in 20 eyes with MCI and 20 eyes with PMCI. The mean age of treatment was 26.25±10.08mo (range, 13-49mo) for MCI and 26.85±12.25mo (range, 16-68mo) for PMCI. Treatment success was achieved in 18 of 20 eyes (90.0%) in the MCI group compared with 10 of 20 eyes (50%) in the PMCI group (P=0.01). In the PMCI group, the tube loss (30%) was greater than the MCI group (5%), however the differences between the 2 groups proved to be not significant (P=0.91).

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that MCI has higher success rate in CNLDO treatment compared with PMCI in this small series of patients.

摘要

目的

比较鼻泪管单管硅胶插管术与推注式鼻泪管单管硅胶插管术(PMCI)治疗先天性鼻泪管阻塞(CNLDO)的成功率。

方法

在一项前瞻性随机临床试验中,49例患有CNLDO的患者的53只眼接受了单管硅胶插管术(MCI)(n = 28只眼)或推注式鼻泪管单管硅胶插管术(PMCI)(n = 25只眼)。所有手术均由1名眼科整形外科医生完成。治疗成功定义为拔管后3个月溢泪完全消失。

结果

对20只接受MCI治疗的眼和20只接受PMCI治疗的眼进行了手术结果评估。MCI组的平均治疗年龄为26.25±10.08个月(范围13 - 49个月),PMCI组为26.85±12.25个月(范围16 - 68个月)。MCI组20只眼中有18只(90.0%)治疗成功,而PMCI组20只眼中有10只(50%)治疗成功(P = 0.01)。在PMCI组中,导管丢失率(30%)高于MCI组(5%),然而两组之间的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.91)。

结论

我们的结果表明,在这一小系列患者中,与PMCI相比,MCI治疗CNLDO的成功率更高。