Suppr超能文献

谷氨酸对预防癌症患儿长春新碱神经毒性无益。

Glutamic acid not beneficial for the prevention of vincristine neurotoxicity in children with cancer.

作者信息

Bradfield Scott M, Sandler Eric, Geller Thomas, Tamura Roy N, Krischer Jeffrey P

机构信息

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Nemours Children's Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida.

出版信息

Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2015 Jun;62(6):1004-10. doi: 10.1002/pbc.25384. Epub 2014 Dec 24.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Vincristine causes known side effects of peripheral sensory, motor, autonomic and cranial neuropathies. No preventive interventions are known.

PROCEDURE

We performed a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of oral glutamic acid as a preventive agent in pediatric patients with cancer who would be receiving vincristine therapy for at least 9 consecutive weeks (Stratum 1 = Wilms tumor and rhabdomyosarcoma) or 4 consecutive weeks in conjunction with steroids (Stratum 2 = Acute lymphoblastic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphoma). At designated time points, a scored neurologic exam using the Modified Balis Pediatric Scale of Peripheral Neuropathies was performed to document neurologic toxicity.

RESULTS

Between 2007 and 2012, 250 patients were enrolled (Stratum 1 = 50, Stratum 2 = 200). The glutamic acid treated group did not have a significantly lower percentage of neurotoxicity compared to placebo treated group either overall or within stratum or age subgroups. The only subgroup which was suggestive of treatment effect was for age. Patients 13 years or older showed a larger benefit in favor of glutamic acid (P = 0.055) compared to patients less than 13 years (P = 1.00). Constipation was the most frequently reported (14%) Grade II or higher neurotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Vincristine-associated neurotoxicity in pediatric oncology remains a frequent complication of chemotherapy for multiple diagnoses with an approximate 30% of patients affected. Glutamic acid is not effective for prevention in pre-adolescents. There is a suggestion of benefit in patients 13 years or older, but the study was not designed to provide adequate power to test the treatment effect within this age group alone.

摘要

背景

长春新碱会引发外周感觉、运动、自主神经及颅神经病变等已知的副作用。目前尚无预防性干预措施。

程序

我们进行了一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲试验,研究对象为接受长春新碱治疗至少连续9周的小儿癌症患者(第1组=肾母细胞瘤和横纹肌肉瘤)或连续4周联合使用类固醇的患者(第2组=急性淋巴细胞白血病和非霍奇金淋巴瘤),口服谷氨酸作为预防剂。在指定时间点,使用改良的巴利斯小儿外周神经病变量表进行评分神经学检查,以记录神经毒性。

结果

2007年至2012年期间,共纳入250例患者(第1组=50例,第2组=200例)。总体而言,以及在各层或年龄亚组中,谷氨酸治疗组的神经毒性百分比与安慰剂治疗组相比均无显著降低。唯一提示有治疗效果的亚组是年龄。13岁及以上的患者与年龄小于13岁的患者相比(P = 1.00),谷氨酸治疗显示出更大的益处(P = 0.055)。便秘是最常报告的(14%)II级或更高等级的神经毒性。

结论

小儿肿瘤学中长春新碱相关的神经毒性仍然是多种诊断化疗的常见并发症,约30%的患者受影响。谷氨酸对青春期前儿童预防无效。13岁及以上患者有获益的迹象,但该研究并非专门设计用于单独检验该年龄组内的治疗效果。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

9
[Effect of bevacizumab in treatment of children with optic pathway glioma].贝伐单抗治疗儿童视路胶质瘤的疗效
Zhongguo Dang Dai Er Ke Za Zhi. 2019 Dec;21(12):1193-1197. doi: 10.7499/j.issn.1008-8830.2019.12.008.

本文引用的文献

5
Novel aspects of natural and modified vinca alkaloids.天然和修饰长春花生物碱的新特性。
Curr Med Chem Anticancer Agents. 2002 Jan;2(1):55-70. doi: 10.2174/1568011023354452.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验