Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston2Diabetes Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Division of General Internal Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Feb;175(2):257-65. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.6888.
Increasing access to care may be insufficient to improve the health of patients with diabetes mellitus and unmet basic needs (hereinafter referred to as material need insecurities). How specific material need insecurities relate to clinical outcomes and the use of health care resources in a setting of near-universal access to health care is unclear.
To determine the association of food insecurity, cost-related medication underuse, housing instability, and energy insecurity with control of diabetes mellitus and the use of health care resources.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional data were collected from June 1, 2012, through October 31, 2013, at 1 academic primary care clinic, 2 community health centers, and 1 specialty center for the treatment of diabetes mellitus in Massachusetts. A random sample of 411 patients, stratified by clinic, consisted of adults (aged ≥21 years) with diabetes mellitus (response rate, 62.3%).
The prespecified primary outcome was a composite indicator of poor diabetes control (hemoglobin A1c level, >9.0%; low-density lipoprotein cholesterol level, >100 mg/dL; or blood pressure, >140/90 mm Hg). Prespecified secondary outcomes included outpatient visits and a composite of emergency department (ED) visits and acute care hospitalizations (ED/inpatient visits).
Overall, 19.1% of respondents reported food insecurity; 27.6%, cost-related medication underuse; 10.7%, housing instability; 14.1%, energy insecurity; and 39.1%, at least 1 material need insecurity. Poor diabetes control was observed in 46.0% of respondents. In multivariable models, food insecurity was associated with a greater odds of poor diabetes control (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.97 [95% CI, 1.58-2.47]) and increased outpatient visits (adjusted incident rate ratio [IRR], 1.19 [95% CI, 1.05-1.36]) but not increased ED/inpatient visits (IRR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.51-1.97]). Cost-related medication underuse was associated with poor diabetes control (OR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.35-2.70]) and increased ED/inpatient visits (IRR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.21-2.34]) but not outpatient visits (IRR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.95-1.21]). Housing instability (IRR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.14-1.51]) and energy insecurity (IRR, 1.12 [95% CI, 1.00-1.25]) were associated with increased outpatient visits but not with diabetes control (OR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.60-2.02] and OR, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.96-1.69], respectively) or with ED/inpatient visits (IRR, 1.49 [95% CI, 0.81-2.73] and IRR, 1.31 [95% CI, 0.80-2.13], respectively). An increasing number of insecurities was associated with poor diabetes control (OR for each additional need, 1.39 [95% CI, 1.18-1.63]) and increased use of health care resources (IRR for outpatient visits, 1.09 [95% CI, 1.03-1.15]; IRR for ED/inpatient visits, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.99-1.51]).
Material need insecurities were common among patients with diabetes mellitus and had varying but generally adverse associations with diabetes control and the use of health care resources. Material need insecurities may be important targets for improving care of diabetes mellitus.
重要的是,增加获得医疗服务的机会可能不足以改善糖尿病患者的健康状况和未满足的基本需求(以下简称物质需求不安全感)。在几乎普及医疗服务的环境中,具体的物质需求不安全感与临床结果和医疗保健资源的使用之间的关系尚不清楚。
确定食物不安全、药物费用相关使用不足、住房不稳定和能源不安全与糖尿病控制以及医疗保健资源使用之间的关系。
设计、地点和参与者:横断面数据于 2012 年 6 月 1 日至 2013 年 10 月 31 日在马萨诸塞州的一家学术初级保健诊所、两家社区健康中心和一家专门治疗糖尿病的中心收集。通过诊所分层,随机抽取了 411 名成年人(年龄≥21 岁)的糖尿病患者(应答率为 62.3%)。
规定的主要结果是糖尿病控制不良的综合指标(血红蛋白 A1c 水平>9.0%;低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平>100mg/dL;或血压>140/90mmHg)。规定的次要结果包括门诊就诊和急诊就诊和急性住院治疗(急诊/住院就诊)的综合指标。
总体而言,19.1%的受访者报告食物不安全;27.6%的人药物费用相关使用不足;10.7%的人住房不稳定;14.1%的人能源不安全;39.1%的人至少存在一种物质需求不安全。46.0%的受访者糖尿病控制不良。在多变量模型中,食物不安全与较差的糖尿病控制(调整后的优势比[OR],1.97[95%置信区间,1.58-2.47])和增加门诊就诊(调整后的发病率比[IRR],1.19[95%置信区间,1.05-1.36])相关,但与增加急诊/住院就诊(IRR,1.00[95%置信区间,0.51-1.97])无关。药物费用相关使用不足与较差的糖尿病控制(OR,1.91[95%置信区间,1.35-2.70])和增加急诊/住院就诊(IRR,1.68[95%置信区间,1.21-2.34])相关,但与增加门诊就诊(IRR,1.07[95%置信区间,0.95-1.21])无关。住房不稳定(IRR,1.31[95%置信区间,1.14-1.51])和能源不安全(IRR,1.12[95%置信区间,1.00-1.25])与增加门诊就诊相关,但与糖尿病控制(OR,1.10[95%置信区间,0.60-2.02]和 OR,1.27[95%置信区间,0.96-1.69])或急诊/住院就诊(IRR,1.49[95%置信区间,0.81-2.73]和 IRR,1.31[95%置信区间,0.80-2.13])无关。不安全的数量增加与糖尿病控制不良(每增加一种需求的优势比,1.39[95%置信区间,1.18-1.63])和增加医疗保健资源的使用相关(门诊就诊的 IRR,1.09[95%置信区间,1.03-1.15];急诊/住院就诊的 IRR,1.22[95%置信区间,0.99-1.51])。
糖尿病患者中物质需求不安全很常见,与糖尿病控制和医疗保健资源的使用有不同但通常不利的关联。物质需求不安全可能是改善糖尿病治疗的重要目标。