Dai Wenjie, Wang Xin, Di Zengru, Wu Jinshan
School of Systems Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, P.R. China.
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 29;9(12):e115706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115706. eCollection 2014.
After the social learning models were proposed, finding solutions to the games becomes a well-defined mathematical question. However, almost all papers on the games and their applications are based on solutions built either upon an ad-hoc argument or a twisted Bayesian analysis of the games. Here, we present logical gaps in those solutions and offer an exact solution of our own. We also introduce a minor extension to the original game so that not only logical differences but also differences in action outcomes among those solutions become visible.
在社会学习模型被提出之后,找到博弈的解决方案就成为了一个定义明确的数学问题。然而,几乎所有关于这些博弈及其应用的论文都是基于要么基于临时论证,要么基于对博弈的扭曲贝叶斯分析构建的解决方案。在这里,我们指出这些解决方案中的逻辑漏洞,并提供我们自己的精确解决方案。我们还对原始博弈进行了一个小扩展,以便不仅能看到这些解决方案之间的逻辑差异,还能看到行动结果的差异。