Suppr超能文献

社会学习博弈近似解中的逻辑漏洞及精确解

Logical gaps in the approximate solutions of the social learning game and an exact solution.

作者信息

Dai Wenjie, Wang Xin, Di Zengru, Wu Jinshan

机构信息

School of Systems Science, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, P.R. China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2014 Dec 29;9(12):e115706. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115706. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

After the social learning models were proposed, finding solutions to the games becomes a well-defined mathematical question. However, almost all papers on the games and their applications are based on solutions built either upon an ad-hoc argument or a twisted Bayesian analysis of the games. Here, we present logical gaps in those solutions and offer an exact solution of our own. We also introduce a minor extension to the original game so that not only logical differences but also differences in action outcomes among those solutions become visible.

摘要

在社会学习模型被提出之后,找到博弈的解决方案就成为了一个定义明确的数学问题。然而,几乎所有关于这些博弈及其应用的论文都是基于要么基于临时论证,要么基于对博弈的扭曲贝叶斯分析构建的解决方案。在这里,我们指出这些解决方案中的逻辑漏洞,并提供我们自己的精确解决方案。我们还对原始博弈进行了一个小扩展,以便不仅能看到这些解决方案之间的逻辑差异,还能看到行动结果的差异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9791/4278726/982d3952046f/pone.0115706.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验