• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拔除3颗和4颗前磨牙治疗安氏II类亚类错牙合的稳定性

Stability of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 premolar extractions.

作者信息

Janson Guilherme, Araki Janine, Estelita Sérgio, Camardella Leonardo T

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Bauru Dental School, University of São Paulo, Alameda Octávio Pinheiro Brisolla 9-75, Bauru 17012-901, São Paulo , Brazil.

出版信息

Prog Orthod. 2014 Dec 30;15(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0067-4.

DOI:10.1186/s40510-014-0067-4
PMID:25547371
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4279037/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to compare the occlusal stability of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 first premolar extractions. A sample of 156 dental casts from 52 patients with class II subdivision malocclusion was divided into two groups according to the extraction protocol. Group 1 comprised 24 patients treated with 3 premolar extractions and group 2 included 28 patients treated with 4 premolar extractions.

METHODS

Peer assessment rating (PAR) indexes were measured on the dental casts obtained before (T1) and after treatment (T2) and at a mean of 6.9 years after the end of treatment (T3). The groups were matching regarding sex distribution, pretreatment, posttreatment and long-term posttreatment ages, and treatment and long-term posttreatment times. They were also comparable concerning the initial malocclusion severity and the occlusal results at the end of treatment. Stability evaluation was calculated by subtracting the posttreatment from the long-term posttreatment index values (T3 - T2). T tests were used to compare the amount and percentage of long-term posttreatment changes.

RESULTS

There were no intergroup differences regarding the amount and percentage of long-term posttreatment changes.

CONCLUSION

Treatment of class II subdivision malocclusion with 3 and 4 premolar extractions have a similar long-term posttreatment occlusal stability.

摘要

背景

本研究的目的是比较拔除3颗和4颗第一前磨牙治疗安氏II类亚类错牙合的咬合稳定性。从52例安氏II类亚类错牙合患者中选取156个牙模样本,根据拔牙方案分为两组。第1组包括24例接受3颗前磨牙拔除治疗的患者,第2组包括28例接受4颗前磨牙拔除治疗的患者。

方法

在治疗前(T1)、治疗后(T2)以及治疗结束后平均6.9年(T3)获取的牙模上测量同侪评估等级(PAR)指数。两组在性别分布、治疗前、治疗后及治疗后长期的年龄,以及治疗和治疗后长期的时间方面相匹配。在初始错牙合严重程度和治疗结束时的咬合结果方面也具有可比性。通过用治疗后长期指数值减去治疗后指数值(T3 - T2)来计算稳定性评估。采用t检验比较治疗后长期变化的量和百分比。

结果

治疗后长期变化的量和百分比在组间无差异。

结论

拔除3颗和4颗前磨牙治疗安氏II类亚类错牙合具有相似的治疗后长期咬合稳定性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44f1/4279037/e2076bb76519/40510_2014_67_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44f1/4279037/79aab32dfddf/40510_2014_67_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44f1/4279037/e2076bb76519/40510_2014_67_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44f1/4279037/79aab32dfddf/40510_2014_67_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/44f1/4279037/e2076bb76519/40510_2014_67_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Stability of class II subdivision malocclusion treatment with 3 and 4 premolar extractions.拔除3颗和4颗前磨牙治疗安氏II类亚类错牙合的稳定性
Prog Orthod. 2014 Dec 30;15(1):67. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0067-4.
2
Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliances [corrected].使用摆式矫治器或拔除两颗上颌前磨牙并结合方丝弓矫治器治疗安氏II类错牙合的疗效比较[已校正]
Eur J Orthod. 2009 Jun;31(3):333-40. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn115. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
3
Stability and relapse of maxillary anterior crowding treatment in class I and class II Division 1 malocclusions.安氏Ⅰ类和安氏Ⅱ类 1 分类错(牙合)上颌前牙拥挤矫治的稳定性和复发。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jun;139(6):768-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.10.044.
4
Treatment times of Class II malocclusion: four premolar and non-extraction protocols.二类错(牙合)畸形的治疗时间:四磨牙远移非拔牙方案。
Eur J Orthod. 2012 Apr;34(2):182-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq182. Epub 2011 Mar 10.
5
Overjet, overbite, and anterior crowding relapses in extraction and nonextraction patients, and their correlations.拔牙和非拔牙患者的覆盖、覆合及前牙拥挤复发情况及其相关性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2014 Jul;146(1):67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.04.012.
6
Prevalence of extraction space reopening in different orthodontic treatment protocols.不同正畸治疗方案中拔牙间隙重新打开的发生率。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017 Sep;152(3):320-326. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2017.01.019.
7
Treatment stability in patients with Class II malocclusion treated with 2 maxillary premolar extractions or without extractions.上颌 2 颗前磨牙拔牙或不拔牙矫治Ⅱ类错[牙合]患者的治疗稳定性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jul;138(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.033.
8
Mandibular changes secondary to serial extractions compared with late premolar extractions and controls.与晚期前磨牙拔除及对照组相比,序列拔牙继发的下颌变化。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2015 Oct;148(4):633-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2015.04.036.
9
Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols.上颌前磨牙拔除和不拔牙矫治方案中的二类错矫治效率
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):490-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.031.
10
Posttreatment stability in Class II nonextraction and maxillary premolar extraction protocols.II类不拔牙和上颌前磨牙拔除矫治方案治疗后的稳定性
Orthodontics (Chic.). 2012;13(1):12-21.

引用本文的文献

1
Evaluation of four machine learning methods in predicting orthodontic extraction decision from clinical examination data and analysis of feature contribution.基于临床检查数据评估四种机器学习方法预测正畸拔牙决策及特征贡献分析
Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024 Oct 14;12:1483230. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1483230. eCollection 2024.
2
Class II subdivision: Cone beam computed tomography- CBCT Analysis.II类亚类:锥形束计算机断层扫描 - CBCT分析。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2021 Aug 1;13(8):e817-e825. doi: 10.4317/jced.58383. eCollection 2021 Aug.
3
Dentoskeletal and soft tissue changes in class II subdivision treatment with asymmetric extraction protocols.

本文引用的文献

1
Frequency evaluation of different extraction protocols in orthodontic treatment during 35 years.35年来正畸治疗中不同拔牙方案的频率评估
Prog Orthod. 2014;15(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0051-z. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
2
Treatment effects of a fixed intermaxillary device to correct class II malocclusions in growing patients.固定颌间装置对生长发育期患者Ⅱ类错牙合畸形的矫治效果。
Prog Orthod. 2014;15(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40510-014-0045-x. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
3
Extraction decision and identification of treatment predictors in Class I malocclusions.
骨性牙颌与软组织变化在伴有非对称拔牙方案的 II 类分牙治疗中的体现。
Prog Orthod. 2017 Dec 4;18(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s40510-017-0193-x.
4
Predictors of postretention stability of mandibular dental arch dimensions in patients treated with a lip bumper during mixed dentition followed by fixed appliances.在混合牙列期使用唇挡随后使用固定矫治器治疗的患者中,下颌牙弓尺寸保持后稳定性的预测因素。
Angle Orthod. 2017 Mar;87(2):209-214. doi: 10.2319/051216-379.1. Epub 2016 Sep 21.
5
Short- and long-term evaluation of mandibular dental arch dimensional changes in patients treated with a lip bumper during mixed dentition followed by fixed appliances.对在混合牙列期使用唇挡随后使用固定矫治器治疗的患者下颌牙弓尺寸变化的短期和长期评估。
Angle Orthod. 2016 Sep;86(5):753-60. doi: 10.2319/073015-519.1. Epub 2016 Jan 15.
6
Predictors of long-term stability of maxillary dental arch dimensions in patients treated with a transpalatal arch followed by fixed appliances.经腭弓治疗后再使用固定矫治器的患者上颌牙弓尺寸长期稳定性的预测因素
Prog Orthod. 2015;16:24. doi: 10.1186/s40510-015-0094-9. Epub 2015 Jul 28.
安氏I类错牙合畸形的拔牙决策及治疗预测因素的识别
Prog Orthod. 2013 Nov 19;14:47. doi: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-47.
4
Posttreatment stability in Class II nonextraction and maxillary premolar extraction protocols.II类不拔牙和上颌前磨牙拔除矫治方案治疗后的稳定性
Orthodontics (Chic.). 2012;13(1):12-21.
5
Influence of the cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with nonextraction or with two maxillary premolar extraction protocols.头影测量特征对采用不拔牙或拔除两颗上颌前磨牙矫治方案治疗的安氏II类错牙合畸形咬合成功率的影响。
World J Orthod. 2010 Winter;11(4):e63-71.
6
Treatment stability in patients with Class II malocclusion treated with 2 maxillary premolar extractions or without extractions.上颌 2 颗前磨牙拔牙或不拔牙矫治Ⅱ类错[牙合]患者的治疗稳定性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Jul;138(1):16-22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.08.033.
7
Long-term stability of Class II malocclusion treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.采用拔除两颗前磨牙和四颗前磨牙方案治疗的安氏II类错牙合畸形的长期稳定性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Aug;136(2):154.e1-10; discussion 154-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.01.020.
8
Influence of cephalometric characteristics on the occlusal success rate of Class II malocclusions treated with 2- and 4-premolar extraction protocols.头影测量特征对采用拔除两颗前磨牙和四颗前磨牙矫治方案治疗的安氏II类错牙合咬合成功率的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Jun;133(6):861-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.045.
9
Class II treatment efficiency in maxillary premolar extraction and nonextraction protocols.上颌前磨牙拔除和不拔牙矫治方案中的二类错矫治效率
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Oct;132(4):490-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.10.031.
10
Third molar availability in Class II subdivision malocclusion.安氏II类亚类错牙合中第三磨牙的萌出情况
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Sep;132(3):279.e15-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.11.018.