Maletis Gregory B, Inacio Maria C S, Funahashi Tadashi T
Kaiser Permanente, Baldwin Park, California, USA
Kaiser Permanente Surgical Outcomes and Analysis Department, San Diego, California, USA.
Am J Sports Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):641-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546514561745. Epub 2014 Dec 29.
Patients generally choose to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) to return to their active lifestyles. However, returning to their previous activity level may result in a retear of their reconstructed knee or an injury to their contralateral anterior cruciate ligament (CACL).
To determine the risk factors associated with revision ACLR and contralateral ACLR (CACLR), compare the survival of the reconstructed ACL with the CACL, and determine how the risk factors associated with revision ACLR compare with those for CACLR.
Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.
A retrospective cohort study of prospectively collected data from the Kaiser Permanente ACLR registry between February 1, 2005, and September 30, 2012, was conducted. Primary ACLR cases without history of contralateral knee ACL injury were included. The study endpoints included revision ACLR and CACLR. Graft type (bone-patellar tendon-bone [BPTB] autograft, hamstring autograft, and allograft) was the main exposure of interest, and patient characteristics were evaluated as risk factors for revision ACLR and CACLR. Survival analyses were conducted.
A total of 17,436 ACLRs were evaluated. The median age was 27.2 years (interquartile range, 18.7-37.7 years), and 64% were males. The 5-year survival for index ACLR was 95.1% (95% CI, 94.5%-95.6%), and for CACL it was 95.8% (95% CI, 95.2%-96.3%). Overall, the cohort had a mean of 2.4 ± 1.7 years of follow-up; 18.2% were lost to follow-up. There were fewer CACLRs per 100 years of observation (0.83) than there were revision ACLRs (1.05) during the study period (P < .001). There was a statistically significant difference in the density of revision ACLR and CACL in BPTB autografts (0.74 vs 1.06, respectively; P = .010), hamstring autografts (1.07 vs 0.81; P = .042), and allografts (1.26 vs 0.67; P < .001). The risk factors for revision ACLR and contralateral surgery were different (P < .05). After adjusting for covariates, factors associated with higher risk of revision ACLR were as follows: allografts, hamstring autografts, male sex, younger age, lower body mass index (BMI), and being white as opposed to black. Factors associated with higher risk of CACLR were as follows: younger age, female sex, and lower BMI.
The 5-year revision-free and CACLR-free survival rate in this study was 95.1% and 95.8%, respectively. Allografts and hamstring autografts had a higher risk of revision ACLR surgery, and BPTB autografts had a higher risk of CACLR. Males were found to have a higher risk of revision ACLR, and females had a higher risk of CACLR. Increasing age and increasing BMI decreased the risk of both revision and CACLR.
患者通常选择接受前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)以恢复积极的生活方式。然而,恢复到之前的活动水平可能会导致重建膝关节再次撕裂或对侧前交叉韧带(CACL)损伤。
确定与翻修ACLR和对侧ACLR(CACLR)相关的危险因素,比较重建ACL与CACL的生存率,并确定与翻修ACLR相关的危险因素与CACLR的危险因素相比情况如何。
队列研究;证据等级,3级。
对2005年2月1日至2012年9月30日期间从凯撒医疗机构ACLR登记处前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性队列研究。纳入无对侧膝关节ACL损伤史的原发性ACLR病例。研究终点包括翻修ACLR和CACLR。移植物类型(骨-髌腱-骨[BPTB]自体移植物、腘绳肌自体移植物和同种异体移植物)是主要关注的暴露因素,患者特征被评估为翻修ACLR和CACLR的危险因素。进行了生存分析。
共评估了17436例ACLR。中位年龄为27.岁(四分位间距,18.7 - 37.7岁),64%为男性。初次ACLR的5年生存率为95.1%(95%CI,94.5% - 95.6%),CACL的5年生存率为95.8%(95%CI,95.2% - 96.3%)。总体而言,该队列的平均随访时间为2.4±1.7年;18.2%失访。在研究期间,每100年观察期内的CACLR(0.83)比翻修ACLR(1.05)少(P <.001)。BPTB自体移植物、腘绳肌自体移植物和同种异体移植物的翻修ACLR和CACL发生率在统计学上有显著差异(分别为0.74对1.06;P = 0.010)、(1.07对0.81;P = 0.042)和(1.26对0.67;P <.001)。翻修ACLR和对侧手术的危险因素不同(P <.05)。在调整协变量后,与翻修ACLR风险较高相关的因素如下:同种异体移植物、腘绳肌自体移植物、男性、年龄较小、体重指数(BMI)较低以及与黑人相比为白人。与CACLR风险较高相关的因素如下:年龄较小、女性和BMI较低。
本研究中5年无翻修和无CACLR的生存率分别为95.1%和95.8%。同种异体移植物和腘绳肌自体移植物翻修ACLR手术的风险较高,BPTB自体移植物发生CACLR的风险较高。发现男性翻修ACLR的风险较高,女性发生CACLR的风险较高。年龄增加和BMI增加降低了翻修和CACLR的风险。