Luangdilok Sutima, Samarnthai Norasate, Korphaisarn Krittiya
Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
J Breast Cancer. 2014 Dec;17(4):376-85. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2014.17.4.376. Epub 2014 Dec 26.
We aimed to determine the rate of pathological complete response (pCR), clinicopathological factors associated with pCR, and clinical outcomes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced breast cancer.
Medical records of patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer between January 2007 and September 2011 were retrospectively reviewed, and the pCR rates were calculated according to three sets of criteria: the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP), the MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), and the German Breast Group (GBG). Tumors were classified as luminal A like, luminal B like, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), or triple-negative. pCR and clinical outcome, including overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were analyzed at the median follow-up of 54.2 months.
Of a total of 179 patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 167 patients (93.3%) had locally advanced breast cancer and 12 patients (6.7%) had early-stage breast cancer. The majority of patients (152 patients, 89.4%) received anthracycline-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The objective clinical response rate was 61.5%, comprising clinical partial response in 5.5% and clinical complete response in 3.9% of patients. Twenty-one (11.7%), 20 (11.2%), and 17 patients (9.5%) achieved pCR according to NSABP, MDACC, and GBG definitions, respectively. pCR rates, as defined by NSABP, according to breast cancer subtype were 4.4%, 9.7%, 24.2%, and 19.2% in luminal A like, luminal B like, HER2, and triple-negative subtypes, respectively. Patients who achieved pCR had significantly better DFS (5-year DFS rates, 80% vs. 53%, p=0.030) and OS (5-year OS rates, 86% vs. 54%, p=0.042) than those who did not.
The pCR rate following neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer in Thai women attending our institution was 11.7%; pCR was more frequently observed in HER2 and triple-negative breast tumor subtypes. Patients who achieved pCR had significantly improved survival.
我们旨在确定局部晚期乳腺癌新辅助化疗后的病理完全缓解(pCR)率、与pCR相关的临床病理因素以及临床结局。
回顾性分析2007年1月至2011年9月期间接受乳腺癌新辅助化疗患者的病历,并根据三组标准计算pCR率:美国国立外科辅助乳腺和肠道项目(NSABP)、MD安德森癌症中心(MDACC)和德国乳腺癌研究组(GBG)。肿瘤分为luminal A样、luminal B样、人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)或三阴性。在中位随访54.2个月时分析pCR和临床结局,包括总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)。
在总共179例接受新辅助化疗的患者中,167例(93.3%)为局部晚期乳腺癌,12例(6.7%)为早期乳腺癌。大多数患者(152例,89.4%)接受了以蒽环类药物为基础的新辅助化疗。客观临床缓解率为61.5%,其中临床部分缓解的患者占5.5%,临床完全缓解的患者占3.9%。根据NSABP、MDACC和GBG的定义,分别有21例(11.7%)、20例(11.2%)和17例(9.5%)患者达到pCR。根据NSABP定义,luminal A样、luminal B样、HER2和三阴性亚型乳腺癌的pCR率分别为4.4%、9.7%、24.2%和19.2%。达到pCR的患者的DFS(5年DFS率,80%对53%,p=0.030)和OS(5年OS率,86%对54%,p=0.042)明显优于未达到pCR的患者。
在我院接受治疗的泰国女性乳腺癌患者中,新辅助化疗后的pCR率为11.7%;pCR在HER2和三阴性乳腺癌亚型中更常见。达到pCR的患者生存率显著提高。