Olson J A, Schwartz J A, Hahka D, Nguyen N, Bunch T, Jensen G M, Adler-Moore J P
Department of Biological Sciences, California State Polytechnic University, Pomona, California, USA.
Charles River Laboratories, Pathology Associates, Frederick, Maryland, USA.
Med Mycol. 2015 Feb 1;53(2):107-18. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myu070. Epub 2014 Dec 30.
Because of the reduced toxicity associated with liposomal amphotericin B preparations, different amphotericin B liposome products have been made. In the present study, we compared the amphotericin B liposomal formulations, AmBisome(®) (AmBi) and Lambin(®) (Lbn), in uninfected and Aspergillus fumigatus infected mice, using several in vitro and in vivo toxicity and efficacy assays. The results showed that the formulations were significantly different, with Lbn 1.6-fold larger than AmBi. Lbn was also more toxic than AmBi based on the RBC potassium release assay and intravenous dosing in uninfected mice given a single 50 mg/kg dose (80% mortality for Lbn vs. 0% for AmBi). Renal tubular changes after intravenous daily dosing for 14 days were seen in uninfected mice given 5 mg/kg Lbn but not with AmBi. Survival following A. fumigatus challenge was 30% for 10 mg/kg Lbn and 60% for 10 mg/kg AmBi. When the BAL and lungs were collected 24 h after the second treatment, AmBi at 10 or 15 mg/kg or 15 mg/kg Lbn lowered the BAL fungal burden significantly vs. the controls (P ≤ 0.05), while there was no difference in lung fungal burden amongst the groups. In contrast, lung histopathology at this same early timepoint showed that AmBi was associated with markedly fewer fungal elements and less lung tissue damage than Lbn. In conclusion, given the differences in size, toxicity, and efficacy, AmBi and Lbn were not physically or functionally comparable, and these differences underscore the need for adequate testing when comparing amphotericin B liposome formulations.
由于脂质体两性霉素B制剂的毒性降低,已制备了不同的两性霉素B脂质体产品。在本研究中,我们使用多种体外和体内毒性及疗效测定方法,在未感染和烟曲霉感染的小鼠中比较了两性霉素B脂质体制剂安必素(AmBisome®)(AmBi)和兰比星(Lambin®)(Lbn)。结果表明,这些制剂存在显著差异,Lbn比AmBi大1.6倍。根据红细胞钾释放试验以及在未感染小鼠中单次静脉注射50mg/kg剂量(Lbn死亡率为80%,AmBi为0%),Lbn的毒性也比AmBi更大。在给予5mg/kg Lbn的未感染小鼠中,每日静脉给药14天后可见肾小管变化,而给予AmBi则未出现。烟曲霉攻击后的存活率,10mg/kg Lbn为30%,10mg/kg AmBi为60%。在第二次治疗后24小时收集支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)液和肺组织,与对照组相比,10或15mg/kg的AmBi或15mg/kg的Lbn显著降低了BAL液中的真菌负荷(P≤0.05),而各组之间肺真菌负荷没有差异。相比之下,在这个相同的早期时间点,肺组织病理学显示,与Lbn相比,AmBi的真菌成分明显更少,肺组织损伤也更小。总之,鉴于大小、毒性和疗效方面的差异,AmBi和Lbn在物理或功能上不具有可比性,这些差异突出了在比较两性霉素B脂质体制剂时进行充分测试的必要性。