Chen Jianghai, Wang Kun, Katirai Foad, Chen Zhenbing
Department Hand Surgery, Wuhan Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Jiefang Ave. 1277, Wuhan, Hubei, 430022, People's Republic of China.
Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Hangkong Road 43, Wuhan, Hubei, 430010, People's Republic of China.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2014 Dec 31;9:136. doi: 10.1186/s13018-014-0136-x.
This study is to develop a new suturing technique for flexor tendon repair by modifying the extant Tsuge repair techniques and to use biomechanical analysis to compare the new method with four established repair techniques and evaluate its clinical efficacy in the repair of 47 flexor tendons in 22 patients.
The biomechanical analysis relied on 50 flexor digitorum profundus tendons harvested from fresh cadavers. The tendons were randomly divided into five groups, transected, and repaired by use of a 1. double-loop suture, 2. double modified locking Kessler, 3. four-strand Savage, 4. modified six-strand Savage, and 5. the new technique. The tensile force and breaking force of all repaired tendons were measured by static loading trials. For clinical application, 22 patients with acute flexor tendon injuries were treated with the new modified Tsuge suture and follow-up for more than 12 months.
While differences in the tensile force and breaking force in the modified Tsuge sutures and modified six-strand Savage sutures were not statistically significant, static loading trials showed the tensile force, in the form of a 2-mm gap formation, and the breaking force of the new modified Tsuge sutures were, statistically, both higher than the ones characteristic of double-loop sutures, double modified locking Kessler, and four-strand Savage sutures. After 12 months, restored functions were observed in all the patients during the postoperative 12 months. Total active motion (TAM) score demonstrated that more than 90% fingers were estimated as excellent or good.
The new modified Tsuge sutures described here have evident higher tensile and breaking forces compared to other four-strand core suture techniques, suggesting, in turn, that this new technique is a good alternative for flexor tendon repairs in clinical applications.
本研究旨在通过改良现有的津下(Tsuge)修复技术,开发一种用于屈指肌腱修复的新缝合技术,并通过生物力学分析将新方法与四种既定修复技术进行比较,评估其在22例患者47条屈指肌腱修复中的临床疗效。
生物力学分析采用从新鲜尸体获取的50条指深屈肌腱。将肌腱随机分为五组,切断后分别采用以下方法修复:1. 双环缝合法;2. 改良双锁定凯斯勒(Kessler)缝合法;3. 四股萨维奇(Savage)缝合法;4. 改良六股萨维奇缝合法;5. 新技术。通过静态加载试验测量所有修复肌腱的拉伸力和断裂力。临床应用方面,22例急性屈指肌腱损伤患者采用改良后的津下新缝合法治疗,并随访12个月以上。
改良津下缝合法与改良六股萨维奇缝合法在拉伸力和断裂力上的差异无统计学意义,但静态加载试验显示,改良后的津下新缝合法在形成2毫米间隙时的拉伸力以及断裂力,在统计学上均高于双环缝合法、改良双锁定凯斯勒缝合法和四股萨维奇缝合法。术后12个月,所有患者均观察到功能恢复。总主动活动度(TAM)评分显示,超过90%的手指评定为优或良。
本文所述的改良津下新缝合法与其他四股核心缝合法相比,具有明显更高的拉伸力和断裂力,这表明该新技术是临床应用中屈指肌腱修复的良好选择。