Suppr超能文献

4 种不同 4 股肌腱缝合技术修复屈肌腱断裂的比较:一项尸体生物力学研究。

Comparison of 4 Different 4-Strand Core Suturing Techniques for Flexor Tendon Laceration: An Ex Vivo Biomechanical Study.

机构信息

Suez Canal University Hospitals, Ismailia, Egypt.

出版信息

Hand (N Y). 2023 Jul;18(5):820-828. doi: 10.1177/15589447211073831. Epub 2022 Feb 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Forces applied to the repaired flexor tendon should not exceed its yield force during early postoperative rehabilitation to prevent gapping and rupture. We aimed to biomechanically compare the tensile strengths and the 2-mm gapping of 4 different 4-strand core suturing techniques for flexor tendon repair.

METHODS

Fifty-six goat deep digital flexor tendons were repaired with the 4-strand double-modified Kessler, the 4-strand augmented Becker, the 4-strand Savage, and the 4-strand modified Tang techniques. All tendons were repaired with 4-0 polyester for core suture and 5-0 polyester for continuous epitendinous running suture. The specimens were subjected to static linear tensile testing by applying a single linear load-to-failure pull. After the linear load testing, the yield load, the ultimate strength of the repaired tendons, and the force exerted to yield a 2-mm gap were measured.

RESULTS

All peripheral sutures ruptured near the yield point. All core suture techniques were similar regarding the yield force. The augmented Becker 4-strand technique had the greatest ultimate strength (98.7 [82-125.3] N). The modified double Kessler technique was the weakest in resisting a 2-mm gap formation. The 4-strand modified Tang repair had the shortest (11.3 [7-15] minutes), while the 4-strand augmented Becker had the longest operative time (29 [23-33] minutes).

CONCLUSIONS

All 4 techniques demonstrated similar yield force, with differences in operative time, ultimate strength, and resistance to gapping. Future clinical studies can further elucidate their appropriateness for early active motion protocols.

摘要

背景

在早期术后康复过程中,修复后的屈肌腱所受的力不应超过其屈服力,以防止间隙和断裂。我们旨在从生物力学角度比较 4 种不同的 4 股核心缝合技术修复屈肌腱的拉伸强度和 2mm 间隙。

方法

56 只山羊深指屈肌腱采用 4 股双改良 Kessler、4 股增强 Becker、4 股 Savage 和 4 股改良 Tang 技术进行修复。所有肌腱均采用 4-0 聚酯进行核心缝合,5-0 聚酯进行连续腱外缝合。标本采用单线性加载至破坏的拉伸试验进行静态线性拉伸试验。线性加载试验后,测量屈服载荷、修复肌腱的极限强度以及产生 2mm 间隙的力。

结果

所有外周缝线均在屈服点附近断裂。所有核心缝合技术的屈服力相似。增强 Becker 4 股技术的极限强度最大(98.7 [82-125.3] N)。改良双 Kessler 技术在抵抗 2mm 间隙形成方面最弱。4 股改良 Tang 修复的手术时间最短(11.3 [7-15] 分钟),而 4 股增强 Becker 的手术时间最长(29 [23-33] 分钟)。

结论

所有 4 种技术的屈服力相似,但手术时间、极限强度和抗间隙能力存在差异。未来的临床研究可以进一步阐明它们在早期主动运动方案中的适宜性。

相似文献

8
Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon repair techniques.屈指肌腱修复技术的生物力学评估
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 May(386):252-9. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200105000-00033.

本文引用的文献

5
Validity of parameters in static linear testing of flexor tendon repair.屈肌腱修复静态线性测试中参数的有效性
J Biomech. 2016 Sep 6;49(13):2785-2790. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2016.06.022. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
7
In vivo flexor tendon forces generated during different rehabilitation exercises.不同康复锻炼过程中产生的体内屈肌腱力。
J Hand Surg Eur Vol. 2015 Sep;40(7):705-10. doi: 10.1177/1753193415591491. Epub 2015 Jun 26.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验