Suez Canal University Hospitals, Ismailia, Egypt.
Hand (N Y). 2023 Jul;18(5):820-828. doi: 10.1177/15589447211073831. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
Forces applied to the repaired flexor tendon should not exceed its yield force during early postoperative rehabilitation to prevent gapping and rupture. We aimed to biomechanically compare the tensile strengths and the 2-mm gapping of 4 different 4-strand core suturing techniques for flexor tendon repair.
Fifty-six goat deep digital flexor tendons were repaired with the 4-strand double-modified Kessler, the 4-strand augmented Becker, the 4-strand Savage, and the 4-strand modified Tang techniques. All tendons were repaired with 4-0 polyester for core suture and 5-0 polyester for continuous epitendinous running suture. The specimens were subjected to static linear tensile testing by applying a single linear load-to-failure pull. After the linear load testing, the yield load, the ultimate strength of the repaired tendons, and the force exerted to yield a 2-mm gap were measured.
All peripheral sutures ruptured near the yield point. All core suture techniques were similar regarding the yield force. The augmented Becker 4-strand technique had the greatest ultimate strength (98.7 [82-125.3] N). The modified double Kessler technique was the weakest in resisting a 2-mm gap formation. The 4-strand modified Tang repair had the shortest (11.3 [7-15] minutes), while the 4-strand augmented Becker had the longest operative time (29 [23-33] minutes).
All 4 techniques demonstrated similar yield force, with differences in operative time, ultimate strength, and resistance to gapping. Future clinical studies can further elucidate their appropriateness for early active motion protocols.
在早期术后康复过程中,修复后的屈肌腱所受的力不应超过其屈服力,以防止间隙和断裂。我们旨在从生物力学角度比较 4 种不同的 4 股核心缝合技术修复屈肌腱的拉伸强度和 2mm 间隙。
56 只山羊深指屈肌腱采用 4 股双改良 Kessler、4 股增强 Becker、4 股 Savage 和 4 股改良 Tang 技术进行修复。所有肌腱均采用 4-0 聚酯进行核心缝合,5-0 聚酯进行连续腱外缝合。标本采用单线性加载至破坏的拉伸试验进行静态线性拉伸试验。线性加载试验后,测量屈服载荷、修复肌腱的极限强度以及产生 2mm 间隙的力。
所有外周缝线均在屈服点附近断裂。所有核心缝合技术的屈服力相似。增强 Becker 4 股技术的极限强度最大(98.7 [82-125.3] N)。改良双 Kessler 技术在抵抗 2mm 间隙形成方面最弱。4 股改良 Tang 修复的手术时间最短(11.3 [7-15] 分钟),而 4 股增强 Becker 的手术时间最长(29 [23-33] 分钟)。
所有 4 种技术的屈服力相似,但手术时间、极限强度和抗间隙能力存在差异。未来的临床研究可以进一步阐明它们在早期主动运动方案中的适宜性。