Suppr超能文献

在急诊护理中,静脉血气分析能否取代动脉血气分析?

Can VBG analysis replace ABG analysis in emergency care?

作者信息

Kelly Anne-Maree

出版信息

Emerg Med J. 2016 Feb;33(2):152-4. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2014-204326. Epub 2014 Dec 31.

Abstract

Blood gas analysis is an integral part of the assessment of emergency department (ED) patients with acute respiratory or metabolic disease. Traditionally ABG analyses have been used, but increasingly, emergency clinicians are using venous blood gas (VBG) analyses. This has been challenged, especially by respiratory physicians, as being too inaccurate. This clinical review, using case examples, summarises the evidence supporting use of VBG to guide management decisions. Arteriovenous agreement for pH is such that values are clinically interchangeable and agreement for bicarbonate is also close. Agreement for pCO2 is poor with 95% limits of agreement of the order of 20 mm Hg (2.67 kPa); however, there is solid evidence that a venous pCO2 ≤45 mm Hg (6 kPa) reliably excludes clinically significant hypercarbia. Evidence regarding arteriovenous agreement for base excess is unclear. Given knowledge of the performance characteristics of VBG analyses, integration of the clinical findings with VBG results is often sufficient to safely guide treatment decision making.

摘要

血气分析是急诊科急性呼吸或代谢疾病患者评估的一个重要组成部分。传统上一直使用动脉血气(ABG)分析,但越来越多的急诊临床医生开始使用静脉血气(VBG)分析。这受到了挑战,尤其是呼吸内科医生,他们认为其准确性太差。本临床综述通过实例总结了支持使用VBG指导管理决策的证据。pH值的动静脉一致性使得其数值在临床上可互换,碳酸氢盐的一致性也很接近。pCO2的一致性较差,95%的一致性界限约为20 mmHg(2.67 kPa);然而,有确凿证据表明静脉pCO2≤45 mmHg(6 kPa)可可靠排除临床上显著的高碳酸血症。关于碱剩余动静脉一致性的证据尚不清楚。鉴于了解VBG分析的性能特征,将临床发现与VBG结果相结合通常足以安全地指导治疗决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验