Department of Respiratory and Sleep Medicine, Austin Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Victorian Respiratory Support Service, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2024 Aug 1;20(8):1259-1266. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.11128.
Venous blood gases (VBGs) are not consistently considered suitable surrogates for arterial blood gases (ABGs) in assessing acute respiratory failure due to variable measurement error. The physiological stability of patients with chronic ventilatory failure may lead to improved agreement in this setting.
Adults requiring ABGs for sleep or ventilation titration studies had VBGs drawn before or after each ABG, in a randomized order. Veno-arterial correlation and agreement were examined for carbon dioxide tension (PCO), pH, oxygen tension (PO), and oxygen saturation (SO).
We analyzed 115 VBG-ABG pairs from 61 patients. Arterial and venous measures were correlated ( < .05) for PCO ( = .84) and pH ( = .72), but not for PO or SO. Adjusted mean veno-arterial differences (95% limits of agreement) were +5.0 mmHg (-4.4 to +14.4) for PCO; -0.02 (-0.09 to +0.04) for pH; -34.3 mmHg (-78.5 to +10.0) for PO; and -23.9% (-61.3 to +13.5) for SO. VBGs obtained from the dorsal hand demonstrated a lower mean PCO veno-arterial difference ( < .01). A venous PCO threshold of ≥ 45.8 mmHg was > 95% sensitive for arterial hypercapnia, so measurements below this can exclude the diagnosis without an ABG. A venous PCO threshold of ≥ 53.7 mmHg was > 95% specific for arterial hypercapnia, so such readings can be assumed diagnostic. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.91 indicated high discriminatory capacity.
A venous PCO < 45.8 mmHg or ≥ 53.7 mmHg would exclude or diagnose hypercapnia, respectively, in patients referred for sleep studies, but VBGs are poor surrogates for ABGs where precision is important.
Registry: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Register; Name: A comparison of arterial and blood gas analyses in sleep studies; URL: https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372717; Identifier: ACTRN12617000562370.
Lindstrom SJ, McDonald CF, Howard ME, et al. Venous blood gases in the assessment of respiratory failure in patients undergoing sleep studies: a randomized study. . 2024;20(8):1259-1266.
由于测量误差的变化,静脉血气(VBG)在评估急性呼吸衰竭时并不总是被认为是动脉血气(ABG)的合适替代物。慢性通气衰竭患者的生理稳定性可能会导致在此设置中更好的一致性。
需要进行 ABG 进行睡眠或通气滴定研究的成年人,在 ABG 前后以随机顺序抽取 VBG。检查了二氧化碳分压(PCO)、pH 值、氧分压(PO)和氧饱和度(SO)的静脉-动脉相关性和一致性。
我们分析了来自 61 名患者的 115 对 VBG-ABG。动脉和静脉测量值相关(<0.05),用于 PCO(=0.84)和 pH(=0.72),但不用于 PO 或 SO。调整后的平均静脉-动脉差值(95%置信区间)为 PCO 的+5.0mmHg(-4.4 至 +14.4);pH 的-0.02(-0.09 至 +0.04);PO 的-34.3mmHg(-78.5 至 +10.0);SO 的-23.9%(-61.3 至 +13.5)。来自手背的 VBG 显示出较低的平均 PCO 静脉-动脉差异(<0.01)。静脉 PCO 阈值≥45.8mmHg 对动脉性高碳酸血症的敏感性>95%,因此低于此值的测量值可以排除 ABG 而无需进行诊断。静脉 PCO 阈值≥53.7mmHg 对动脉性高碳酸血症的特异性>95%,因此可以假定此类读数具有诊断意义。0.91 的接收器工作特征曲线下面积表明具有较高的区分能力。
在接受睡眠研究的患者中,静脉 PCO<45.8mmHg 或≥53.7mmHg 可分别排除或诊断高碳酸血症,但在需要精确性的情况下,VBG 是 ABG 的不良替代物。
澳大利亚新西兰临床试验注册处;名称:睡眠研究中动脉血气与血气分析的比较;网址:https://www.anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=372717;标识符:ACTRN12617000562370。
林德斯特罗姆 SJ、麦克唐纳 CF、霍华德 ME 等人。静脉血气在睡眠研究中评估呼吸衰竭的作用:一项随机研究。睡眠,2024;20(8):1259-1266。