Goto Tadahiro, Watase Hiroko, Morita Hiroshi, Nagai Hideya, Brown Calvin A, Brown David F M, Hasegawa Kohei
Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Fukui Hospital Fukui, Japan Senri Critical Care Medical Centre, Osaka Saiseikai Senri Hospital, Suita, Japan.
Japanese Emergency Medicine Network, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Emerg Med J. 2015 Oct;32(10):781-6. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203473. Epub 2014 Dec 31.
To determine whether the success rate of repeated attempts at tracheal intubation by a single intubator was lower than those by alternate intubators in the emergency department (ED).
An analysis of data from a multicentre prospective registry (Japanese Emergency Airway Network Registry) of 13 academic and community EDs in Japan between April 2010 and August 2012. We included all adult and paediatric patients who underwent repeated attempts at tracheal intubation in the ED. We compared the intubation success rates at the second and third attempts between attempts at intubation by a single intubator who performed the previous attempts, and the attempts by alternate intubators.
We recorded 4094 patients (capture rate, 96%); 1289 patients with repeated attempts at tracheal intubation were eligible for this study. Among these, 871 patients (68%) had a second attempt at intubation by single intubators. At the second attempt, tracheal intubation by a single intubator was associated with a decreased success rate (adjusted odds ratio or AOR, 0.50; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.71), compared with alternate intubators. At the third attempt, intubation by a single intubator was also associated with a decreased success rate (58% vs 70%; unadjusted OR, 0.58; 95% CI 0.38 to 0.89). However, after adjustment for potential confounders, the association lost statistical significance (AOR, 0.89; 95% CI 0.52 to 1.56).
In this large multicentre study of ED patients undergoing tracheal intubation, second attempts at intubation by a single intubator, compared with those by alternate intubators, were independently associated with a decreased success rate.
确定在急诊科(ED),同一名插管者重复进行气管插管的成功率是否低于交替插管者。
对2010年4月至2012年8月间日本13家学术及社区急诊科的多中心前瞻性登记处(日本紧急气道网络登记处)的数据进行分析。我们纳入了所有在急诊科接受重复气管插管尝试的成年和儿科患者。我们比较了由进行先前插管尝试的同一名插管者进行的第二次和第三次插管尝试的成功率,以及交替插管者的尝试成功率。
我们记录了4094例患者(捕获率96%);1289例接受重复气管插管尝试的患者符合本研究条件。其中,871例患者(68%)由同一名插管者进行第二次插管尝试。在第二次尝试时,与交替插管者相比,同一名插管者进行气管插管的成功率降低(调整后的优势比或AOR,0.50;95%CI 0.36至0.71)。在第三次尝试时,同一名插管者进行插管的成功率也降低(58%对70%;未调整的OR,0.58;95%CI 0.38至0.89)。然而,在对潜在混杂因素进行调整后,这种关联失去了统计学意义(AOR,0.89;95%CI 0.52至1.56)。
在这项对接受气管插管的急诊科患者进行的大型多中心研究中,与交替插管者相比,同一名插管者进行的第二次插管尝试独立地与成功率降低相关。