Cardiovascular Research Institute and Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit 48201.
Cardiovascular Research Institute and Department of Physiology, and Department of Emergency Medicine, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit 48201.
Dose Response. 2014 Oct 20;12(4):650-63. doi: 10.2203/dose-response.14-035.Whittaker. eCollection 2014 Dec.
Thousands of articles have been published on the topic of ischemic conditioning. Nevertheless, relatively little attention has been given to assessment of conditioning's dose-response characteristics. Specifically, the consequences of multiple conditioning episodes, what we will term "hyperconditioning", have seldom been examined. We propose that hyperconditioning warrants investigation because it; (1) may be of clinical importance, (2) could provide insight into conditioning mechanisms, and (3) might result in development of novel models of human disease. The prevalence of angina pectoris and intermittent claudication is sufficiently high and the potential for daily ischemia-reperfusion episodes sufficiently large that hyperconditioning is a clinically relevant phenomenon. In basic science, attenuation of conditioning-mediated infarct size reduction found in some studies after hyperconditioning offers a possible means to facilitate further discernment of cardioprotective signaling pathways. Moreover, hyperconditioning's impact extends beyond cytoprotection to tissue structural elements. Several studies demonstrate that hyperconditioning produces collagen injury (primarily fiber breakage). Such structural impairment could have adverse clinical consequences; however, in laboratory studies, selective collagen damage could provide the basis for models of cardiac rupture and dilated cardiomyopathy. Accordingly, we propose that hyperconditioning represents the dark, but potentially illuminating, side of ischemic conditioning - a paradigm that merits attention and prospective evaluation.
数千篇文章已经发表在缺血预处理这一主题上。然而,对于预处理的剂量反应特征评估,相对来说关注较少。具体来说,我们称之为“超预处理”的多个预处理事件的后果,很少被检查过。我们提出超预处理值得研究,因为它:(1)可能具有临床重要性,(2)可以深入了解预处理机制,以及 (3)可能导致人类疾病的新型模型的发展。心绞痛和间歇性跛行的患病率足够高,每日缺血再灌注发作的潜在可能性也足够大,因此超预处理是一种具有临床相关性的现象。在基础科学中,在一些研究中发现,超预处理后预处理介导的梗死面积减少的衰减提供了一种可能的方法,有助于进一步辨别心脏保护信号通路。此外,超预处理的影响不仅限于细胞保护,还涉及到组织结构元素。几项研究表明,超预处理会导致胶原损伤(主要是纤维断裂)。这种结构损伤可能会产生不良的临床后果;然而,在实验室研究中,选择性胶原损伤可能为心脏破裂和扩张型心肌病的模型提供基础。因此,我们提出超预处理代表了缺血预处理的黑暗但潜在的启示方面——这一范式值得关注和前瞻性评估。