Gillen Glen, Nilsen Dawn M, Attridge Jessica, Banakos Erasmia, Morgan Marie, Winterbottom Lauren, York Wesley
Glen Gillen, EdD, OTR, FAOTA, is Associate Professor of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine (Occupational Therapy), Programs in Occupational Therapy, Columbia University Medical Center, Columbia University, New York, NY;
Dawn M. Nilsen, EdD, OTL, is Assistant Professor of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine (Occupational Therapy), Columbia University Medical Center, New York, NY.
Am J Occup Ther. 2015 Jan-Feb;69(1):6901180040p1-9. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2015.012138.
This evidence-based review was conducted to determine which interventions are effective in improving occupational performance after stroke. Forty-six articles met the inclusion criteria and were examined. Interventions for the following impairments were reviewed: general cognitive deficits, executive dysfunction, apraxia, memory loss, attention deficits, visual field deficits (included because of their close relationship with neglect), and unilateral neglect. Evidence is available from a variety of clinical trials to guide interventions regarding general cognition, apraxia, and neglect. The evidence regarding interventions for executive dysfunction and memory loss is limited. There is insufficient evidence regarding impairments of attention and mixed evidence regarding interventions for visual field deficits. The effective interventions have some commonalities, including being performance focused, involving strategy training, and using a compensatory as opposed to a remediation approach. The implications of the findings for practice, research, and education are discussed.
本次循证综述旨在确定哪些干预措施对改善中风后的职业表现有效。46篇文章符合纳入标准并接受了审查。对以下损伤的干预措施进行了综述:一般认知缺陷、执行功能障碍、失用症、记忆丧失、注意力缺陷、视野缺损(因其与忽视密切相关而纳入)和单侧忽视。有来自各种临床试验的证据可指导有关一般认知、失用症和忽视的干预措施。关于执行功能障碍和记忆丧失干预措施的证据有限。关于注意力损伤的证据不足,关于视野缺损干预措施的证据则好坏参半。有效的干预措施有一些共同特点,包括以表现为重点、涉及策略训练以及采用补偿而非补救方法。讨论了研究结果对实践、研究和教育的启示。