Hu Yinin, Choi Joanna, Mahmutovic Adela, Kim Helen, Le Ivy A, Rasmussen Sara K
Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.
Department of Surgery, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, Virginia.
J Surg Res. 2015 Apr;194(2):334-340. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2014.11.047. Epub 2014 Nov 29.
A procedural training protocol for medical students must be cognizant of faculty opportunity costs, which may preclude individually supervised practice. Meanwhile, sporadic exposure in large group settings yields suboptimal proficiency. The purpose of this study is to assess the effectiveness of undergraduate assistant instructors in providing one-on-one simulation-based instruction for basic invasive techniques.
Investigators designed proficiency-based checklists by faculty consensus for three simulation tasks as follows: orotracheal intubation, central venous catheterization, and suturing. Four undergraduate students were trained as instructors. Interrater agreement between instructors using the task checklists ranged from 0.754-0.866. Instructors conducted up to seven flexibly scheduled, one-on-one practice sessions with clinically inexperienced medical student participants. Sessions comprised repetitive task attempts with an evaluation after every attempt. On completion of the training protocol, participants underwent evaluation by an experienced surgeon blinded to practice session performance. Study participants were surveyed to assess satisfaction.
Twenty-nine participants completed the study. Median total practice time was 8.75 h (interquartile range 7.12-8.75). Posttest pass rates were 93% (26/28), 71% (20/28), and 68% (19/28) for suturing, intubation, and central venous catheterization, respectively. Ninety-seven percent (27/28) of participants were satisfied with their experience, and 62% (18/29) advocated for protocol adoption into the standard preclinical curriculum. Estimated cost saved using student instructors, based on departmental collections for surgical faculty, was $43,760.
Clinically inexperienced assistants may be trained as instructors for basic simulation tasks with excellent interrater reliability. Deploying these assistant instructors makes effective, one-on-one technical training for preclinical medical students financially feasible.
医学生的程序训练方案必须考虑到教员的机会成本,这可能会妨碍个体监督下的实践。同时,在大组环境中的零星接触所产生的熟练程度并不理想。本研究的目的是评估本科助理教员在为基础侵入性技术提供一对一模拟教学方面的有效性。
研究人员通过教员共识设计了基于熟练程度的清单,用于以下三项模拟任务:经口气管插管、中心静脉置管和缝合。四名本科生被培训为教员。使用任务清单的教员之间的评分者间一致性范围为0.754 - 0.866。教员与临床经验不足的医学生参与者进行了多达七次灵活安排的一对一练习课程。课程包括重复的任务尝试,每次尝试后进行评估。在完成训练方案后,由一名对练习课程表现不知情的经验丰富的外科医生对参与者进行评估。对研究参与者进行调查以评估满意度。
29名参与者完成了研究。总练习时间中位数为8.75小时(四分位间距7.12 - 8.75)。缝合、插管和中心静脉置管的测试后通过率分别为93%(26/28)、71%(20/28)和68%(19/28)。97%(27/28)的参与者对他们的经历感到满意,62%(18/29)主张将该方案纳入标准临床前课程。根据外科教员的部门收费计算,使用学生教员节省的估计成本为43,760美元。
临床经验不足的助手可以被培训为基础模拟任务的教员,评分者间可靠性极佳。部署这些助理教员使临床前医学生的有效一对一技术培训在经济上可行。