Ouyang Min, Yang Kun
Department of Systems Science and Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1037 Luoyu Road, Wuhan 430074, China.
Chaos. 2014 Dec;24(4):043121. doi: 10.1063/1.4897268.
Power grids, which are playing an important role in supporting the economy of a region as well as the life of its citizens, could be attacked by terrorists or enemies to damage the region. Depending on different levels of power grid information collected by the terrorists, their attack strategies might be different. This paper groups power grid information into four levels: no information, purely topological information (PTI), topological information with generator and load nodes (GLNI), and full information (including component physical properties and flow parameters information), and then identifies possible attack strategies for each information level. Analyzing and comparing power grid vulnerability under these attack strategies from both terrorists' and utility companies' point of view give rise to an approach to quantify the relative values of these three types of information, including PTI, GLNI, and component parameter information (CPI). This approach can provide information regarding the extent to which topological information matters for power system vulnerability decisions. Taking several test systems as examples, results show that for small attacks with p ≤ 0.1, CPI matters the most; when taking attack cost into consideration and assuming that the terrorists take the optimum cost-efficient attack intensity, then CPI has the largest cost-based information value.
电网在支撑地区经济和公民生活方面发挥着重要作用,但可能会受到恐怖分子或敌人的攻击,从而对该地区造成破坏。根据恐怖分子收集的电网信息水平不同,其攻击策略可能会有所不同。本文将电网信息分为四个级别:无信息、纯拓扑信息(PTI)、含发电机和负荷节点的拓扑信息(GLNI)以及全信息(包括元件物理特性和潮流参数信息),然后针对每个信息级别确定可能的攻击策略。从恐怖分子和电力公司的角度分析和比较这些攻击策略下的电网脆弱性,得出一种量化这三种类型信息(包括PTI、GLNI和元件参数信息(CPI))相对价值的方法。这种方法可以提供有关拓扑信息对电力系统脆弱性决策重要程度的信息。以几个测试系统为例,结果表明,对于p≤0.1的小规模攻击,CPI最为重要;当考虑攻击成本并假设恐怖分子采取最优成本效益攻击强度时,CPI具有基于成本的最大信息价值。