Suppr超能文献

体外冲击波心肌血运重建术对难治性心绞痛患者的有益作用。

The beneficial effect of extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization in patients with refractory angina.

作者信息

Alunni Gianluca, Marra Sebastiano, Meynet Ilaria, D'amico Maurizio, Elisa Pelloni, Fanelli Annalaura, Molinaro Stefano, Garrone Paolo, Deberardinis Armando, Campana Mario, Lerman Amir

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Turin, Italy.

Department of Cardiology, University Hospital S. Giovanni Battista, Turin, Italy.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;16(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Nov 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The incidence of patients with refractory angina (RA) is increasing. Medical therapy for RA is limited and prognosis is poor. Experimental data suggest that the use of Extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization (ESMR) may contribute to angiogenesis and improve symptoms of angina in patients with RA. Purpose of our study is to determine the efficacy of cardiac shock wave therapy (ESMR) in the management of patients with nonrevascolarized coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study to examine the efficacy of ESMR applcation in patients with RA despite optimal medical therapy, not suitable for further PCI or CABG. Characteristics such as angina class scores (CCS class score), nitroglycerin consumption and hospitalization rate among cases (patients with RA who received ESMR) and controls (patients with RA who did not receive ESMR) were compared at baseline and 6 months after ESMR therapy. In patients receiveing d ESMR the effect of on cardiac perfusion was assessed.

RESULTS

There were 43 patients in the case group and 29 patients in the control group. The mean age of the patients was 70 ± 9.5 years in the case group and 71 ± 5.3 years in the control group. Other characteristics (diabetes, coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneus coronary intervention, baseline CCS class score) were similar in both groups. There was a significant improvement in CCS class score (1.33 ± 0.57 in cases and 1.92 ± 0.69 in controls; p = 0.0002), nitroglycerin consumption (20% in case cases, and 44.8% in controls; P < 0.03) and hospitalization rate significantly reduced (13.9% in case cases, and 37.9% in controls; P < 0.03). The patients who received ESMR, there was a significantly improvement in myocardial perfusion after 6 months with a 33% relative reduction of summed stress score (SSS) (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSION

This case control study demonstrates the beneficial effect of ESMR therapy on cardiac symptoms, myocardial perfusion and reduced hospitalization in patients with refractory angina. Ther current study supports a role for ESMR as a non-invasive therapuetic option for patients with RA.

摘要

目的

难治性心绞痛(RA)患者的发病率正在上升。RA的药物治疗有限且预后较差。实验数据表明,体外冲击波心肌血运重建术(ESMR)的应用可能有助于血管生成并改善RA患者的心绞痛症状。我们研究的目的是确定心脏冲击波疗法(ESMR)在治疗非血运重建冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中的疗效。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,以检验ESMR应用于尽管接受了最佳药物治疗但仍不适合进一步PCI或CABG的RA患者的疗效。比较了病例组(接受ESMR的RA患者)和对照组(未接受ESMR的RA患者)在基线和ESMR治疗后6个月时的心绞痛分级评分(CCS分级评分)、硝酸甘油消耗量和住院率等特征。对接受ESMR的患者评估其对心脏灌注的影响。

结果

病例组有43例患者,对照组有29例患者。病例组患者的平均年龄为70±9.5岁,对照组为71±5.3岁。两组的其他特征(糖尿病、冠状动脉搭桥术、经皮冠状动脉介入治疗、基线CCS分级评分)相似。CCS分级评分有显著改善(病例组为1.33±0.57,对照组为1.92±0.69;p = 0.0002),硝酸甘油消耗量显著降低(病例组为20%,对照组为44.8%;P < 0.03),住院率显著降低(病例组为13.9%,对照组为37.9%;P < 0.03)。接受ESMR的患者在6个月后心肌灌注有显著改善,总应激评分(SSS)相对降低了33%(p = 0.002)。

结论

这项病例对照研究证明了ESMR疗法对难治性心绞痛患者的心脏症状、心肌灌注和降低住院率有有益作用。当前研究支持ESMR作为RA患者的一种非侵入性治疗选择的作用。

相似文献

1
The beneficial effect of extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization in patients with refractory angina.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;16(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2014.10.011. Epub 2014 Nov 10.
2
The beneficial effect of extracorporeal shockwave myocardial revascularization: Two years of follow-up.
Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2017 Dec;18(8):572-576. doi: 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.05.006. Epub 2017 May 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Cardioprotective effects of shock wave therapy: A cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study on acute ischemia-reperfusion injury.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023 Apr 27;10:1134389. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1134389. eCollection 2023.
4
Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 25;9:932193. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.932193. eCollection 2022.
5
Contemporary Management of Refractory Angina.
Interv Cardiol Clin. 2022 Jul;11(3):279-292. doi: 10.1016/j.iccl.2022.03.002.
6
A pathophysiological compass to personalize antianginal drug treatment.
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Dec;18(12):838-852. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00573-w. Epub 2021 Jul 7.
7
Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy for Coronary Heart Disease: an Updated Meta-analysis.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Oct 1;35(5):741-756. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0276.
8
Non-pharmacological Treatment of Refractory Angina and Microvascular Angina.
Biomedicines. 2020 Aug 13;8(8):285. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines8080285.
9
Low-Energy Shockwave Treatment Promotes Endothelial Progenitor Cell Homing to the Stenotic Pig Kidney.
Cell Transplant. 2020 Jan-Dec;29:963689720917342. doi: 10.1177/0963689720917342.

本文引用的文献

3
The efficacy of cardiac shock wave therapy in the treatment of refractory angina: a pilot prospective, randomized, double-blind trial.
Int J Cardiol. 2013 Sep 10;167(6):3033-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2012.11.099. Epub 2012 Nov 30.
4
Noninvasive therapy for the management of patients with advanced coronary artery disease.
Coron Artery Dis. 2012 Dec;23(8):549-54. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e328358a606.
5
Spinal cord stimulation therapy for patients with refractory angina who are not candidates for revascularization.
Neuromodulation. 2012 Nov-Dec;15(6):550-8; discussion 558-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00452.x. Epub 2012 Apr 11.
8
Initial clinical experience with extracorporeal shock wave therapy in treatment of ischemic heart failure.
Congest Heart Fail. 2010 Sep-Oct;16(5):226-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7133.2010.00182.x.
10
Extracorporeal shock wave therapy: current evidence.
J Orthop Trauma. 2010 Mar;24 Suppl 1:S66-70. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e3181cad510.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验