• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

冠状动脉疾病中的心脏冲击波疗法:一项系统评价与荟萃分析

Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

Qiu Quan, Chen Shenjie, Qiu Yuangang, Mao Wei

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 25;9:932193. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.932193. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.3389/fcvm.2022.932193
PMID:35958405
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9358011/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Coronary artery disease (CAD) has been one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Cardiac shock wave therapy (CSWT) is a novel and non-invasive therapy for CAD. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of CSWT on CAD.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed a comprehensive search of electronic databases such as PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Wanfang Data in October 2021. The results were reported as weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Statistical heterogeneity scores were assessed with the standard Cochran's test and the statistic. A total of 8 randomized trials and 2 prospective cohort studies, together involving 643 patients ( = 336 CSWT and = 307 control), were included in our study. Eight studies with 371 patients showed significantly improved rest left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with CSWT as compared to that of the control group (WMD 3.88, 95% CI 1.53-6.23, = 0.001, = 51.2%). Seven studies with 312 patients reported left ventricular internal diameter in diastole (LVIDd) were markedly decreased in the CSWT group compared to the control group (WMD -1.81, 95% CI -3.23 to -0.39, = 0.012, = 20.3%). The summed stress score significantly favored the CSWT group (WMD -3.76, 95% CI -6.15 to -1.37, = 0.002, = 56.8%), but there was no significant difference for the summed rest score. Our data were acquired from studies without a perceived high risk of bias, so plausible bias is unlikely to seriously affect the main findings of the current study.

CONCLUSION

Based on data from our present meta-analysis, CSWT was shown to moderately improve myocardial perfusion and cardiac function among patients with CAD, which would provide the clinicians with a meaningful and valuable option.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

The meta-analysis was registered on the Open Science Framework (OSF) (https://osf.io/r2xf9).

摘要

目的

冠状动脉疾病(CAD)一直是全球发病和死亡的主要原因之一。心脏冲击波疗法(CSWT)是一种针对CAD的新型非侵入性治疗方法。因此,我们进行了一项系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估CSWT对CAD的疗效。

方法与结果

2021年10月,我们对PubMed、Embase、Cochrane图书馆和万方数据等电子数据库进行了全面检索。结果以加权平均差(WMD)和95%置信区间(CI)报告。采用标准Cochran检验和统计量评估统计异质性得分。我们的研究共纳入8项随机试验和2项前瞻性队列研究,涉及643例患者(CSWT组336例,对照组307例)。八项研究共371例患者显示,与对照组相比,CSWT显著改善了静息左心室射血分数(LVEF)(WMD 3.88,95%CI 1.53 - 6.23,P = 0.001,I² = 51.2%)。七项研究共312例患者报告,与对照组相比,CSWT组舒张末期左心室内径(LVIDd)明显减小(WMD -1.81,95%CI -3.23至-0.39,P = 0.012,I² = 20.3%)。总应力评分明显有利于CSWT组(WMD -3.76,95%CI -6.15至-1.37,P = 0.002,I² = 56.8%),但总静息评分无显著差异。我们的数据来自无明显高偏倚风险的研究,因此合理的偏倚不太可能严重影响本研究的主要结果。

结论

基于我们目前荟萃分析的数据,CSWT被证明可适度改善CAD患者的心肌灌注和心脏功能,这将为临床医生提供一个有意义且有价值的选择。

系统评价注册

该荟萃分析已在开放科学框架(OSF)(https://osf.io/r2xf9)上注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7364/9358011/f106172dc3d6/fcvm-09-932193-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7364/9358011/e1588ec87909/fcvm-09-932193-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7364/9358011/a2c9b9a9f21e/fcvm-09-932193-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7364/9358011/2890e9e53633/fcvm-09-932193-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7364/9358011/97b5a35e3485/fcvm-09-932193-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7364/9358011/6367249d1adb/fcvm-09-932193-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7364/9358011/f106172dc3d6/fcvm-09-932193-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7364/9358011/e1588ec87909/fcvm-09-932193-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7364/9358011/a2c9b9a9f21e/fcvm-09-932193-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7364/9358011/2890e9e53633/fcvm-09-932193-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7364/9358011/97b5a35e3485/fcvm-09-932193-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7364/9358011/6367249d1adb/fcvm-09-932193-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7364/9358011/f106172dc3d6/fcvm-09-932193-g006.jpg

相似文献

1
Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy in Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.冠状动脉疾病中的心脏冲击波疗法:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Jul 25;9:932193. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.932193. eCollection 2022.
2
Cardiac shock-wave therapy in the treatment of coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.心脏冲击波疗法治疗冠状动脉疾病:系统评价与荟萃分析
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2017 Apr 12;15(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s12947-017-0102-y.
3
Effect of cardiac shock wave therapy plus optimal medical therapy on rehospitalization in patients with severe coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.心脏冲击波疗法联合最佳药物治疗对重症冠状动脉疾病患者再住院率的影响:一项荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Dec 12;9:1010342. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1010342. eCollection 2022.
4
Efficacy and safety of cardiac shock wave therapy for patients with severe coronary artery disease: A randomized, double-blind control study.心脏冲击波治疗严重冠状动脉疾病患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲对照研究。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Oct;29(5):2404-2419. doi: 10.1007/s12350-021-02768-7. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
5
Clinical Outcomes of Cardiac Shockwave Therapy in Severe Coronary Artery Disease Patients after Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.冠状动脉旁路移植术后严重冠状动脉疾病患者心脏冲击波治疗的临床结果
Int Heart J. 2023 Mar 31;64(2):137-144. doi: 10.1536/ihj.22-481. Epub 2023 Mar 15.
6
The effect of cardiac shock wave therapy on myocardial function and perfusion in the randomized, triple-blind, sham-procedure controlled study.在随机、三盲、假手术对照研究中,心脏冲击波疗法对心肌功能和灌注的影响。
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2019 Jul 4;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12947-019-0163-1.
7
Cardiac shock wave therapy and myocardial perfusion in severe coronary artery disease.心脏冲击波疗法与严重冠状动脉疾病中的心肌灌注
Clin Res Cardiol. 2015 Oct;104(10):843-9. doi: 10.1007/s00392-015-0853-0. Epub 2015 Apr 17.
8
Single photon emission computed tomography for the diagnosis of coronary artery disease: an evidence-based analysis.单光子发射计算机断层扫描用于冠状动脉疾病的诊断:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(8):1-64. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
9
Effect of cardiac shock wave therapy on the microvolt T wave alternans of patients with coronary artery disease.心脏冲击波疗法对冠心病患者微伏T波交替的影响。
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Sep 15;8(9):16463-71. eCollection 2015.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
A study of extracorporeal cardiac shock wave therapy combined with exercise rehabilitation in postoperative patients with PCI for CHD.冠心病PCI术后患者体外心脏冲击波治疗联合运动康复的研究
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21670. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-05475-2.
2
Roles of Mechanosensitive Channel Piezo1 in Wound Healing and Scar Formation.机械敏感通道Piezo1在伤口愈合和瘢痕形成中的作用
Life (Basel). 2024 Mar 13;14(3):377. doi: 10.3390/life14030377.
3
Attenuation of Myocardial Dysfunction in Hypertensive Cardiomyopathy Using Non-R-Wave-Synchronized Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and safety of cardiac shock wave therapy for patients with severe coronary artery disease: A randomized, double-blind control study.心脏冲击波治疗严重冠状动脉疾病患者的疗效和安全性:一项随机、双盲对照研究。
J Nucl Cardiol. 2022 Oct;29(5):2404-2419. doi: 10.1007/s12350-021-02768-7. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
2
Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy Ameliorates Myocardial Ischemia in Patients With Chronic Refractory Angina Pectoris: A Randomized Trial.心脏冲击波疗法改善慢性难治性心绞痛患者的心肌缺血:一项随机试验。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Jul 21;8:664433. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.664433. eCollection 2021.
3
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.
应用非 R 波同步心脏冲击波治疗高血压性心肌病心肌功能障碍的衰减。
Int J Mol Sci. 2022 Oct 31;23(21):13274. doi: 10.3390/ijms232113274.
PRISMA 2020 声明:系统评价报告的更新指南。
BMJ. 2021 Mar 29;372:n71. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n71.
4
Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy Alleviates Hypoxia/Reoxygenation-Induced Myocardial Necroptosis by Modulating Autophagy.心脏冲击波疗法通过调节自噬减轻缺氧/复氧诱导的心肌坏死性凋亡。
Biomed Res Int. 2021 Jan 19;2021:8880179. doi: 10.1155/2021/8880179. eCollection 2021.
5
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics-2021 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association.心脏病与中风统计-2021 更新:美国心脏协会报告。
Circulation. 2021 Feb 23;143(8):e254-e743. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000950. Epub 2021 Jan 27.
6
Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy for Coronary Heart Disease: an Updated Meta-analysis.冠心病的心脏冲击波治疗:一项更新的荟萃分析。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020 Oct 1;35(5):741-756. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0276.
7
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
8
The effect of cardiac shock wave therapy on myocardial function and perfusion in the randomized, triple-blind, sham-procedure controlled study.在随机、三盲、假手术对照研究中,心脏冲击波疗法对心肌功能和灌注的影响。
Cardiovasc Ultrasound. 2019 Jul 4;17(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12947-019-0163-1.
9
Shock-Wave Therapy Improves Myocardial Blood Flow Reserve in Patients with Refractory Angina: Evaluation by Real-Time Myocardial Perfusion Echocardiography.实时心肌灌注超声心动图评价冲击波治疗对难治性心绞痛患者心肌血流储备的改善。
J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2019 Sep;32(9):1075-1085. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2019.04.420. Epub 2019 Jun 22.
10
Cardiac Shock Wave Therapy Attenuates Cardiomyocyte Apoptosis after Acute Myocardial Infarction in Rats.心脏冲击波疗法可减轻大鼠急性心肌梗死后的心肌细胞凋亡。
Cell Physiol Biochem. 2018;49(5):1734-1746. doi: 10.1159/000493616. Epub 2018 Sep 24.